Cases

980 So.2d 440 (2007) Antonio Jermaine FLAKE v. STATE. CR-05-0471. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. August 31, 2007. *441 Thomas J. Azar, Jr., Montgomery, for appellant. Troy King, atty. gen., and Marc A. Starrett, asst. atty. gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appellant, Antonio Jermaine Flake, was conv

¶ 1. Byron Flake appeals the Circuit Court of Neshoba County's judgment convicting him of possession of methamphetamine and sentencing him to eight years in the custody of the Department of Corrections. We find no error and affirm. SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. On February 17, 2004, a warrant was issued to search Byron Flake's residence in Neshoba County. This came about because on February 16, 2004, a confidential informant (C.

151 Ga. App. 578 (1979) 260 S.E.2d 523 GWINNETT COMMERCIAL BANK v. FLAKE et al. 57959. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued June 11, 1979. Decided September 7, 1979. Rehearing Denied October 2, 1979. G. Hughel Harrison, F. Carlton King, for appellant. Peyton S. Hawes, Jr., Julie Childs, James

320 F.Supp. 531 (1970) Billie K. FREEMAN, Guardian of Terry Freeman, Plaintiff, v. Almon FLAKE, Principal of Viewmont High School, the Board of Education of Davis County School District, and Irvin R. Cleverly, Morris Hansen, Henry E. Peterson, Lynn W. Burton, and Harold J. Gailey, members of the Board of Education of Davis County School District, and Bernell Wrigley, Superintendent of Davis County Schools, Defendants. Vyron Randall OSTLER, a

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. Regulation of hair styles of male students in state public schools is becoming a matter of major concern to federal courts if one is to judge by the ever-increasing litigation on the subject or by the days of court time expended, and the lengthy briefs presented, in the cases now before us. We are convinced that the United States Constitution and statutes do not impose on the federal courts the d

*1078513 U. S. 925; 513 U. S. 504; 513 U. S. 1189; 513 U. S. 1146; 513 U. S. 1150; 513 U. S. 1150; 513 U. S. 1145; 513 U. S. 1153; 513 U. S. 1153; 513 U. S. 1155; 513 U. S. 1192; 513 U. S. 1156; 513

*1078513 U. S. 925; 513 U. S. 504; 513 U. S. 1189; 513 U. S. 1146; 513 U. S. 1150; 513 U. S. 1150; 513 U. S. 1145; 513 U. S. 1153; 513 U. S. 1153; 513 U. S. 1155; 513 U. S. 1192; 513 U. S. 1156; 513

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0066p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ THURMAN KING, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │

02/18/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 22, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT KING VAUGHN, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Trousdale County No. 2019-CR-74 Brody N. Kane, Judge ___________________________________

[Cite as King v. American Family Ins., 2017-Ohio-5514.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO BARBARA KING, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2016-T-0096 - vs -

MORRISON, Judge. The offense is indecent exposure, as defined by Article 535c, Vernon’s Ann. P. C.; the punishment, five years. A young high school girl testified that on the way home from school she observed the appellant sitting on the sidewalk and leaning up against a building; that her companion called the appellant to her attention, and as she looked at him he first returned her glance and then looked d

998 A.2d 397 (2010) 193 Md. App. 582 Calvin Almeida KING v. STATE of Maryland. No. 0152, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 7, 2010. *399 David Felsen (Greenberg, Selsen & Sargent, LLC, on the brief) Rockville, MD, for appellant. Brian S. Kleinbord (Douglas F. Gansl

Burgess, J. ¶ 1. Defendants in these consolidated appeals contend the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress evidence seized from a vehicle in which they were passengers. The trial court found that the vehicle’s owner voluntarily consented to the search. Defendants contend: (1) the finding of voluntariness must be reviewed de novo on appeal; (2) the consent to search was not voluntary; and (3) the consent was tainted b

Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting. Today the Court declines to decide whether a public school may constitutionally refuse to permit a student to attend solely because his hair style meets with the disapproval of the school authorities. The Court also denied certiorari in Olff v. East Side Union High School District, 404 U. S. 1042, which presented the same issue. I dissented in Olff,

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. John Smart and two companies he controls (collectively, “Smart”) filed this diversity action in the District of North Dakota against Sunshine Potato Flakes, L.L.C. (“Sunshine”). The district court granted Sunshine’s motion to compel arbitration and stayed the action. We dismissed Smart’s appeal of this interlocutory order for lack of jurisdiction, as requir

460 S.W.2d 789 (1970) Leon FLAKE, et al., Appellants, v. THOMPSON, INC., Appellee. No. 5-5441. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 21, 1970. *790 Byron R. Bogard, No. Little Rock, and Bruce T. Bullion, Little Rock, for appellants. Wayne W. Owen and Joseph C. Kemp, Little Rock, for appellee. FOGLEMAN, Justice.

868 P.2d 743 (1994) STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel., Craig D. CORGAN, District Attorney, Eleventh District of Oklahoma, Appellant, v. Paul Wesley KING, Appellee. No. S-92-1210. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. February 8, 1994. Stephen Coit, Asst. Dist. Atty. (at trial), Stephen Coit, Asst. Dist. Atty. (on appeal), Bartlesville, for appellant. Jim Fransein,

407 F.Supp. 1274 (1976) WIENER KING, INC., Plaintiff, v. The WIENER KING CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 75-1018. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 9, 1976. *1275 *1276 Bain, Gilfillan & Rhodes, Newark, N. J., for plaintiff. McCarter & English, Newark

This is a civil action to recover damages which the plaintiff alleges she sustained as the result of the publication of her photograph or likeness in connection with an advertisement in the Greensboro Daily News, published by the defendant Greensboro News Company. No summons was served on the defendants Anton Scibilia and Nick Boila, trading under the firm name of "Folies de Paree," and they are not parties hereto. Folies de Paree was a vaudeville or stage show and advertised

King appeals from a judgment of conviction of possessing a still and sentence to serve two years in the penitentiary. After his motion for new trial was overruled, he submitted his appeal December 22, 1966. I. Two deputy sheriffs saw King come up to a stillyard with some jugs. King first lit a burner under the still. The still pot was "charged" with mash. Second, he put about twenty gallons of water in the flake stand. Third, using "dough" [probably clay], he s