Cases

707 A.2d 1169 (1998) Michael HOPKINS and Arthur Clark, Petitioners, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 8, 1997. Decided January 9, 1998. *1170 Robert D. Mariani, Scranton, for petitioners. Michael I. Levin, Huntingdon, for intervenor, Pittston Area

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion by the pro se plaintiff James E. Flaherty (Flah-erty” or the “plaintiff”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) 60(b) for relief from the Court’s order dated November 14, 2003 dismissing the plaintiffs complaint for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND

In April 1984, appellant, Harrison T. Hopkins, was arrested for speeding, driving without a valid driver's license, driving while under the influence of alcohol and carrying a concealed weapon. Appellant was tried before a jury on all charges, except speeding, in the Painesville Municipal Court. After voir dire was conducted and the jury sworn, and at the close of appellee's opening statement, one of the jurors, Jay A. Harris, asked to be recognized by the court. Realizing that he and

293 F.Supp.2d 355 (2003) Mary FLAHERTY, Plaintiff, v. METROMAIL CORPORATION now known as Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. and Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. as successor in interest to Metromail Corporation, Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 0435(NRB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 6, 2003. *356

Connolly, J. On October 25, 2002, the plaintiff, Boston Police Officer Sean Flaherty (“Officer Flaherty”) filed a negligence claim against the defendant, Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc. (“Walgreeris”) and others. The Complaint alleged in part that Officer Flaherty was seriously injured due to the negligence of Walgreeris employee(s). Walgreeris has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, W

355 F.Supp. 816 (1972) A. P. HOPKINS CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. STUDEBAKER CORPORATION, ONAN DIVISION, a Michigan corporation, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 29403. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. December 29, 1972. *817 *818

McFarland, J., The petitioner is under sentence of imprisonment for a violation of an ordinance of the city of Redlands, and seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus *560upon the ground that said ordinance is wholly invalid and void. The ordinance is entitled “An ordinance to promote safety and security to public travel by prohibiting the beating

OPINION The plaintiff, Linda Pereira, brought suit to recover damages for injuries she suffered when she fell at Kent Heights Park in East Providence. She now appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Kevin Fitzgerald, in his capacity as Treasurer of the City of East Providence (the city). This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the is

OPINION Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court. The plaintiff, Jaime Carreiro (plaintiff), appeals from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, David Tobin (defendant). 1 Specifically, the plaintiff asserts that the trial justice erred in finding

958 A.2d 620 (2008) MERRIMACK MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ronald H. DUFAULT et al. No. 2007-196-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. October 17, 2008. *621 Kathryn Hopkins, Cranston, for Plaintiff. Wayne Resmini, Providence, for Defendants. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, J

OPINION The plaintiff, Carlo P. Berardis, appeals from the Superior Court's grant of motions for summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Bounthinh Louangxay and Oudone Louangxay (the Louangxays) and Louangxay, Inc., d/b/a Warwick Banquet Hall a/k/a Lei's Bar Grill (Lei's Bar Grill). This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 30, 2009, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised

PER CURIAM: Cynthia L. Foulke appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foulke v. Decker, No. 6:12-cv-00006-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 4356692 (W.D.Va. Sept. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

899 A.2d 399 (2006) DIOCESE OF ALTOONA-JOHNSTOWN v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF the BOROUGH OF STATE COLLEGE, Donald Hopkins and Mildred Hopkins Appeal of: Donald Hopkins and Mildred Hopkins. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 6, 2006. Decided May 19, 2006. *400 David D. Engle, State College, for appellants.

OPINION BY JUDGE PELLEGRINI. The City of Philadelphia (City) and Philadelphia Gas Works (PGW) appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) adopting the recommended decision of the administra*97tive law judge (ALJ) allocating each of them 100% of their relocation costs relative to the reconstruction of the Holme Avenue

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF AMENDED SETTLEMENT AND APPROVING THE FORM AND MANNER OF NOTICE OF AMENDED SETTLEMENT SINGAL, Chief Judge. At the January 24, 2005 hearing in this matter, Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the amended settlement (the “Settlement”) set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated July 23, 2004 (the “Agreement”) and the Amendment to Settlement Agreement

BENJAMIN, Justice: In this original jurisdiction action, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus compelling the respondents to call a special election as soon as practicable in 2011 to fill the vacancy in the office of governor created on November 15, 2010, when former Governor Joe Manchin, III, resigned from that office to assume the office of United States Senator. Petitioners herein are the West Virginia Citizen Action Grou

401 F.Supp.2d 147 (2005) Kimberly SYLVESTER, Lisa Steinbeiser-Maurer, Carolee Lindsey, Roger Cromwell, Jennifer Byrd, Janice Bayne, Robin Mitchum and Gladys Hall, as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Hall, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CIGNA CORPORATION d/b/a Cigna Healthcare, Cigna Holdings, Inc., Connecticut General Corporation, Cigna Health Corporation, Healthsource, Inc., Healths

757 P.2d 761 (1988) Albert H. NEUMANN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sally Marlene ROGSTAD, Personal Representative of the Estate of Isabel Neumann, Deceased, Defendant and Respondent. No. 87-529. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 24, 1988. Decided May 6, 1988. *762 Randy Winner, Flaherty and Winn

535 Pa. 95 (1993) 634 A.2d 201 Kathryn JONES, Appellee, v. Joseph TROJAK, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted April 7, 1992. Decided November 23, 1993. Reargument Denied February 28, 1994. *96 *97 Ronald Ervais, Mary Jane Deaves Hopkins,

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted. Justices CAPPY and CASTILLE dissent and would reach the merits of the cases.