Cases

602 So.2d 873 (1992) Jackie BALL v. Robert FITZPATRICK. No. 90-CA-0359. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 15, 1992. *874 Wilbur O. Colom, Colom & Colom, Christy E. Massie, Columbus, for appellant. Jeffrey C. Smith, Sims & Sims, Columbus, for appellee. EN BANC. ROY NOBLE LEE, Chief Justice, for the Co

740 P.2d 1244 (1987) Samuel J. BUTLER, Donald H. Toomer and Roberta Toomer, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Oral J. WILKINSON, Edna Mae Wilkinson, and Tim Themy, Defendants and Appellants. Pearl SHAW, Samuel J. Butler, Donald H. Toomer, and Roberta Toomer, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Oral J. WILKINSON and Edna Mae Wilkinson, Defendants and Appellants, and Stephen L. Christensen and James L. Christensen, individually and d/b/a W.

The contention first presented in appellant's brief is that it was error not to sustain pleas in abatement urged by him on the ground that the note sued upon was not due at the time the suit was commenced, and on the ground that Fitzpatrick was not then the owner of the note. The assignments presenting the contention are overruled. It appeared that the note was due and that Fitzpatrick was the legal holder and owner thereof at the time the amended petition on which the cause was tried was fil

CaRUTheks, J., delivered the opinion o£ the Court: This is filed as a cross hill to that of Wilkinson as executor of Daniel Young deceased, for the administration of his' estate under the insolvent laws, against his creditors and legatees. The complainant is the widow of the deceased, who, after dissenting from the will of her husband, asserts her right to the 'twelve slaves derived from her father under his wi

USCA11 Case: 22-13643 Document: 73-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 1 of 30 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13643 ____________________ JAIME PIZARRO, CRAIG

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1734 AMRO FARID, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]

¶1 In this case and its companion, LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC, 181 Wn.2d 117, 330 P.3d 190 (2014), we consider issues arising from a joint venture proposal regarding a debt collection business. The debt collection business operated according to the functional terms of the joint venture proposal from approximately winter 2005 through summer 2007, at which point the disagreements underlying the present litigation surfaced. This opinio

OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION *413II.PROCEDURAL HISTORY III. GENERAL FACTUAL BACKGROUND IV. LEGAL STANDARDS: FRAUDULENT TRANSFER A. Overview B. Badges of Intentional Fraud C. Constructiv

890 A.2d 726 (2006) 390 Md. 620 Katherine Rose FOX v. Vincent WILLS. No. 43, September Term, 2003. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 18, 2006. Gregory F. Jacob of Arlington, VA (Elizabeth L. Ritter of Chevy Chase), on brief, for petitioner. David Super, Christopher Thomas Stidvent, Clarissa Hodges, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, D.C.

OPINION Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court. Background: A City in Distress We are called upon to determine the constitutionality of G.L.1956 chapter 9 of title 45, in the face of a challenge by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Central Falls. Before we begin our analysis, we find it appropriate to pause and compliment the detailed, well-written, and scholarly decisio

MEMORANDUM OPINION KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on two motions to dismiss filed by the Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF Nos. 7 & 9). The motions collectively seek the dismissal *379of all claims brought by the Plaintiff. For

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge MOTZ wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Elizabeth Brinkley appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Harbour Recreation Club (HRC), on her Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §. 2000e-2(a)(l) (West 1994), and Equal Pay Act, 29

Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge. *140Table of Contents Background...142 I. Derivatives and the Money Market...142 II. The BBSW Rate "Set"...143 A. Prime Bank Bills...143 B. The Rate "Set"...144 III. BBSW-Ba

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring challenges to certain zoning and environmental ordinances enacted by Defendant Village of Pomona (the “Village”), alleging they are unlawful under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Aet of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Smith Metal and Iron Company appeals the district court’s order holding that a payment for goods sold to Continental Commodities, Inc., was a preference as defined by the Bankruptcy Code of 1978, 11 U.S.C. § 547. The dispositive issue is whether, for the purpose of section 547(c)(2)(B), a transfer of funds by check is effective when the creditor receives the check or when the debtor’s bank ho

867 F.Supp. 50 (1994) AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. SENTRY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Sentry Savings Bank, F.S.B.; Resolution Trust Corporation; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; John Abreau; Hester A. Armstrong; Phillip J. Assiran; Robert D. Aubrey; John T. Aylward; Arthur G. Baronousky; Robert F. Barry; Anita M. Bolduc; Barry E. Burden; Byran E. Berthold; Paul F. Butler; Wendy Buttrick; Jane C. Caron; Judith

113 B.R. 924 (1990) TEXACO, INC., et al. v. LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLORATION CO., et al. v. LaFOURCHE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al. Civ. A. No. 88-998-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. April 19, 1990. *925 *926 Gene W. Lafitte, Joe B. Norman, Catherine H. Brown, Stevia M. Wa

543 F.Supp. 1201 (1982) Leslie P. McCROAN, Plaintiff, v. Mary K. BAILEY, Individually and as Manager, Augusta College Bookstore; Alex S. Mura, Individually, and as Director of Personnel, Augusta College; Joseph Mele, Individually, and Dean for Business and Finance, Augusta College; and Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia d/b/a Augusta College, Defendants. Civ. A. No. CV181-247. United

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

It is insisted that section 234 of the Constitution does not apply to the 150 shares issued to Mr. Mudd because (a) it was a stock sale and not a stock issue, and (b) because it was an issue of stock against surplus. And it is also insisted, in the alternative, that the record shows that the corporation received money or property of full value for those shares. We cannot accept the theory that section 234, supra, and section 26, Title 10, Code, do not apply to stock originally issued a