Cases

ACCEPTED 02-18-00178-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 5/24/2018 2:13 PM

OPINION J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DAVID R. FARMER, J., joined, and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., filed a concurring opinion. Appellant corporation appeals the trial court’s rulings finding it liable for breach of contract damages, prejudgment interest, and damages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. Additionally, the corporat

Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. B.P. P.L.C., et al.; Anne Arundel County, Maryland v. B.P. P.L.C., et al; City of Annapolis v. B.P. P.L.C., et al., No. 11, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Booth, J. FEDERAL DISPLACEMENT/PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW CLAIMS The Supreme Court of Maryland considered three consolidated cases—one case filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and two cases filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. In these cases, the Mayor and Council of Baltimore City

ACCEPTED 14-14-00855-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/18/2015 12:34:30 PM

ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4288348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

972 F.Supp. 21 (1997) SYSTEMS COUNCIL EM-3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD of ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT & T CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-1117(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 12, 1997. *22 *23 Richard B. Sigmond, Kent

CLARK, District Judge. A restraining order was heretofore allowed on the bills in these cases, and they are now before the court on application for preliminary injunctions upon the pleadings and proofs offered to support and oppose the motion. The cases are heard together for convenience, the proofs being treated as offered in each case, so far as applicable and competent. The remedy now sought, if granted, will constitute a new

Case: 21-20316 Document: 00516488262 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 28, 2022

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15-3400 AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-3017 ROMSPEN MORTGAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BGC HOLDINGS LLC – ARLINGTON PLACE ONE, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United State

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ FIREXO, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appella

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00408-CV Ricky Gonzales, Jr., Appellant v. Shannon Marie Gonzales, Appellee FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-20-001620, THE HONORABLE MADELEINE CONNOR, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION

146 July 15, 2020 No. 9 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION POWEREX CORP., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5339) On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, Plaintiff argued that it was not a “public utility” and therefore O

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Judge Contents I. Introduction...537 *537A. History of Straight-Ticket Voting in Michigan...537 B. Procedural History...538 C. Passage of SB 13...539 1. SB 13 in the Michigan Legislature and Governor's Office...540

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0694 ══════════ Brent Edward Webster, Petitioner, v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Distr

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00749-CV CONSULTANTS IN PAIN MEDICINE, PLLC and David Blanton, Appellants v. ELLEN BOYLE DUNCAN, PLLC and Ellen Boyle Duncan, M.D.,

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PATEL, District Judge. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Hoffmann-La Roche Notice On September 5, 2006 plaintiffs Roy Adams (“Adams”), Robert Eggert (“Eg-gert”), Michael Ferris (“Ferris”), Ed Hall (“Hall”) and Rohit Singh (“Singh”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed this putative collective action against defendant Inter-Con Security Systems (“Inter-Co

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1942 JOHN M. KLUGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWNSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern