Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom”
Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCompublic domain
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendants AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone and Bo-dymedia, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants” or “Jawbone”) motion for judgment on the pleadings that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,026,053 (the “’053 patent”), 9,106,307 (the “’307 patent”), and 9,048,923 (the “’923 patent”) (collectively, t
Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: Dkt. No. 47 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion, filed by Plaintiffs Alipheom D/B/A Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc. (“Jawbone”), to stay this action pending'resolution of proceedings before the International Trade Commission : (“ITC”). ‘ Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers and considered their argumen
Immersion Corp. v. Fitbit, Inc.public domain
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Immersion Corporation ("Immersion") filed a patent infringement suit *1010against Defendant Fitbit, Inc. ("Fitbit"). Immersion alleges that Fitbit infringes claims of U.S. Patent No.
Wi-Lan Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.public domain
(1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' RULE 12(c) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION COUNTERCLAIMS; AND [Doc. No. 56.] (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RULE 12(c) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' UNENFORCEABILITY COUNTERCLAIM [Doc. No. 61.] MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge On February 1, 2019, Plaintiffs Wi-LAN Inc., Wi-LAN USA, In
Pers. Beasties Grp. LLC v. Nike, Inc.public domain
John G. Koeltl, United States District Judge Personal Beasties Group LLC, the plaintiff and owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,769,915 (the " '915 Patent"), alleges that Nike, Inc., the defendant, infringed its '915 Patent. The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Pro
Lomingkit v. Apollo Education Group Inc.public domain
ORDER James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court are: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Plaintiffs’] See-*1143ond Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal- Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Federal Rules”) 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6), (Doc. 88), and Defendants’ Request for Jud
Location Based Servs., LLC v. Niantic, Inc.public domain
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge In the summer of 2016 it was common to see children and adults walking while craning their necks down to their phones in an effort to catch Pokémon or reach Pokéstops. This patent infringement suit goes to the core of the mapping technology used in Pokémon GO. Plaintiff Location Based Services, LLC (LBS) asserts 44 separate claims spread out over four map-related patents that are