Cases

OPINION BY Judge McGINLEY. This is an appeal by Alfirst Bank (Mi-first) from the Orders of the Board of *671Finance and Revenue (Board) that refused Allfirst’s Petitions for Review, in which Ailfirst alleged it was not subject to the Bank and Trust Company Shares Tax (“Bank Shares Tax”), imposed by Section 701 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of Mar

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

820 F.Supp. 697 (1993) The STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. Walter T. BLANK, Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc., and Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., Defendants. Walter T. BLANK and Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, New England Marine Contractors, Inc., Capital Mutual Insurance Co., and National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., Third-Pa

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

159 Ill. App.3d 818 (1987) 512 N.E.2d 1276 In re ESTATE OF GEORGE S. HALAS, JR., Deceased (Kirkland & Ellis, Petitioner-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Christine D. Halas et al., Respondents-Appellees and Cross-Appellants). Nos. 85-2422, 86-3397 cons. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed July 22, 1987.

PRADO, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal arises out of an alleged multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford through his various corporate entities. These three cases deal with the scope of the preclusion provision of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLUSA”). That provision states: “No covered class action based upon the statutory o

502 N.W.2d 524 (1993) LAKE REGION CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CRYSTAL PURE WATER, INC.; Russell L. Gilliss, Sr.; Bruce D. Gilliss; Renae A. Gilliss; Community Credit Union of New Rockford; County of Eddy, ND, a corporation; CBC Credit Services of ND, Inc., d/b/a Credit Bureau of Devils Lake; and all persons unknown, claiming any estate or interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the real estate described in the Complaint, Defendants,<

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises a preemption issue pitting federal authority in the field of radio communications against local zoning authority. The precise issue is whether the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended (FCA), and regulations promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) preempt a local zoning board’s power to enforce a condition of a permit to construct and use a communica

204 F.3d 311 (2nd Cir. 2000) GRAEME FREEMAN, MARY BETH FREEMAN, FRANK ITTLEMAN, ELAINE ITTLEMAN, MIKE FOURNIER, HOLLY FOURNIER, ELLEN LANE, WILLIAM PINNEY, JR., MARK W. BOLLES, CLAUDIA MUCKLOW, DONNA A. WARK, IRIS MUGGENTHALER, JAMES H. SQUIRES, LAWRENCEHAMILTON, ROBERT CARMODY, MARK MUSIEL, MICHAEL YANTACHKA, LORIE GADBOURY, CHRIS MCGEE, PETER COLEMAN, BARBARA SANFORD FARRELL, AND WILLIAM PINNEY, SR.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BURLING

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

458 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2006) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Intervenors, United States of America Plaintiff, v. The State of ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. CV-83-M-1676-. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama. October 5, 2004. *1275 Alice H. Martin, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Birm

ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. Table of Contents I. Case History............................................................1201 II. Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Ex Parte Young Doctrine............1205 III. Copyright Infringement and the Fair Use Defense........................

PRESIDING JUSTICE McNAMARA delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioner, the law firm of Kirkland and Ellis, sought $957,099.05 in attorney fees and $24,359.08 in costs for its representation of the executor and trustee for the estate of decedent George S. Halas, Jr. Objections to the petition were filed by respondents A. Gerson Miller, as successor executor

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

This appeal involves the decision of three questions: (1) Whether or not the order or judgment of the Public Service Commission, appealed from herein, is subject to judicial review; (2) the extent to which a judicial review is limited if the power exists; and (3) whether there is substantial (that is, more than a scintilla of) evidence to support the judgment of the commission, or, as stated *Page 713 in many reported cases, whether the order or judgment

398 F.Supp.2d 563 (2005) In re SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1553. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. June 30, 2005. *564 *565 *566 John R. Fabry, Liaison Counsel, for all plaintiffs. Darrell Lee Barger, Liaiso