Cases

HOLLANDER, Judge. Appellants, James and Mary Kiley, sued appellee, First National Bank of Maryland (the “Bank”), in a multi-count complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. The Kileys sought compensatory and punitive damages stemming from the Bank’s alleged breach of contract and tortious misconduct. The gravamen of appellants’ various causes of action centers on their contentions that the Bank improperly att

Sullivan, P.J. Citizens National Bank appeals from dismissal of its complaint pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(B) (6). Because the complaint herein was dismissed prior to any discovery or reception of evidence, the record before us is somewhat scant. However, for background purposes, the following facts, discernible from prior federal litigation,1 are worthy of not

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered June 7, 2002, which, upon granting plaintiff’s motion for reargument, vacated a prior order, same court and Justice, entered October 19, 2000, reinstated a July 1994 judgment of foreclosure and sale and a June 1995 referee’s deed of sale, and directed the Civil Court to reinstate a warrant of eviction in plaintiffs favor against tenants Tracie Evans and Steven O’Keefe, affirmed, wit

CHOY, Circuit Judge: Loral Terracom (“Loral”) appeals the district court’s order granting Citizens Bank and Trust Company’s (“Citizens”) and Valley National Bank’s (“Valley”) joint Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Loral alleges that Citizens and Valley (“the Banks”) negligently failed or unreasonably performed

526 F.Supp. 510 (1981) COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INSURANCE INC., Plaintiff, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF DALLAS, Garnishee, Alan Eberstein, M.D., Professional Association Employees' Profit Sharing Plan and Trust; Alan Eberstein, M.D., Professional Association Employees' Pension Plan and Trust; Alan Eberstein, M.D., Professional Association; and Alan Eberstein, Trustee Intervenors. Civ. A. No. 3-80-0489-H. <

JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. The Kansas Public Employees Retirement System, commonly known as KPERS, appeals from the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction, enjoining it from suing Boatmen’s First National Bank of Kansas City in any other court for claims relating to Boatmen’s role as indenture trustee under two subordinated debentures KPERS purchased from Hom

891 P.2d 1262 (1995) The FIRST STATE BANK, Ketchum, Oklahoma, Appellee, v. DIAMOND PLASTICS CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 76571. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. March 14, 1995. As Corrected March 16 and 21, 1995. Ronald N. Ricketts, Gable & Gotwals, Inc., Tulsa, Ronald E. Fry, Bailey & Fry, Vinita, for appellee. Mark K. Blongewicz, Robert G.

Opinion BANKE, J. Defendant and respondent State Lands Commission (Lands Commission) approved a 30-year lease allowing real party in interest and respondent Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Chevron) to continue operating a marine *554terminal in San Francisco Bay waters, near the company’s refinery in Richmond, California. Plaintiffs and appellants Citizens for Eas

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NORDBERG, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this action on behalf of themselves and others who sold Allegis Corporation common stock or puts in Alleg-is Corporation common stock between October 29, 1987 and December 8, 1987 (the “class period”).1 Plaintiffs seek damages under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and under

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 15, 2022 Decided June 3, 2022 No. 21-7047 NOAH J. ROSENKRANTZ, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Blackmun, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg join, dissenting. The main themes of the Court’s opinion are that the text of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), 15 U. S. C. § 78j(b), does not expressly mention aiding and abetting liability, and that Congress knows how to legislate. Both propositions are unexceptionable, but

291 F.Supp.2d 1052 (2003) MINNESOTA CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Douglas A. KELLEY, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 02-3819(RHK/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. November 12, 2003. *1053 *1054 *1055

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge Plaintiffs, Rashanda McCants (“McCants”) and Devon Ramsay (“Ramsay”), brought this putative class action in state court against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (the “NCAA”) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC-Chapel Hill”), alleging various state claims against each Defendant. The NCAA removed the case to this

OPINION OF THE COURT Saliann Scarpulla, J. Plaintiff Barclays Bank PLC (Barclays) brings this action against defendant Paul Kemsley (Kemsley) for breach of contract in connection with a loan agreement. In motion sequence No. 002, Barclays seeks summary judgment against Kemsley on its breach of contract claim. In motion sequence No. 004, Kemsley seeks summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: Appellants, companies holding federal leases for oil and gas production on the outer continental shelf, seek credits for hundreds of royalty overpayments made between 1990 and 1994. The Department of the Interior is withholding the overpayments pending resolution of its claims that th

647 F.3d 78 (2011) NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Brian STEPHEN; Elaine K. STEPHEN. No. 09-1731. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 5, 2011. Opinion Filed July 22, 2011. *79 Sherri J. Braunstein, Esquire (Argued), Lorraine Gazzara Doyle, Esquire, Heidi R.

Hoffman, J. Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Paulette Fry was found guilty of the offense of uttering a forged instrument as defined in IC 1971, 35-1-124-1, Ind.Ann. Stat. § 10-2102 (Burns 1956). The trial court then ordered that appellant be committed to the custody of the Superintendent of the Indiana Women’s Prison for a period of not less than two nor more than fourteen years; that she be

581 F.Supp. 945 (1984) George MOROSANI, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA. Civ. No. C81-1553. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. February 23, 1984. *946 Robert B. Remar, Jonathan A. Zimring, Remar, Arnold & Zimring, Jerome J. Fro

Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN T1 In this case involving dual tracking, a process where banks pursue foreclosure on a home while negotiating a loan modification, plaintiffs, Judith Z. and Thomas C. Miller (the Millers), filed claims against five financial institutions (collectively the Banks) 1 The Millers

OPINION SHIPP, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon several motions filed by the Parties. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), National Basketball Association (“NBA”), National Football League (“NFL”), National Hockey League (“NHL”), and Office of the Commissioner of Baseball doing business as Major League Baseball (“MLB”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “the Leagues”) f