Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRYAN CONNOLLY and SUSAN CONNOLLY, Individually and as Co-Administrators of the Estate of ETHAN P. CONNOLLY, C.A. No. N14C-08-006 FWW Plaintifffs, THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. and ALPHA XI CHAPTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, Individually and as a chapter and agent of the Theta Chi Fraternity, ALPHA EPSILON PHI Sorority, Individually and t/a PHI CHI CHAPTER, UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, Individually and as agent of ALPHA EPSILON PHI Sorority, EXECUTI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HIRECOUNSEL DC, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-3337 (LLA) v. KILIAN CONNOLLY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff HIRECounsel D.C., LLC (“HIRECounsel”) brings this action against Kilian Connolly alleging breach of contract and

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2061 Doc: 79 Filed: 05/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 71 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2061 SPEECH FIRST, INC., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TIMOTHY SANDS, in his individual capacity and official capaci

OPINION MESSITTE, District Judge. This is a lawsuit brought by former customers of a brokerage house against the brokerage house, one of its employees, and certain individuals and entities who allegedly received improper control over the former customers’ assets.1 Earlier this year, Plaintiff Josephine C. Vellone filed a Motion to Compel Enforcement of Subpoenas that s

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, ex rel. WILLIAM SEAN FRENCH, v. ) ) ) ) ) § Plaintiff-Relator, ) C.A. No. N13C-06-289 PRW CCLD ) ) ) CARD COMPLIANT, LLC, er al., ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: June 5, 2018 Decided: August 29, 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon Plaintijjfs ’ Daubert Motl`on to Exclua’e the Opl'nions of Defendants ’ Expert Jennifer Bora’en, DENIED. Upon Plaz'nti/j% ’ Dauber“c Motion to Exclua’e the Opinions of Defendants ’ Expert

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, ex rel. WILLIAM SEAN FRENCH, V. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) C.A. No. N13C-06-289 PRW CCLD ) ) ) cARD COMPLIANT, LLC, er al., ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: January 16, 2018 Decided: April 30, 2018 Withdrawn and Reissued With Clarifications: August 29, 2018 M`EMORANDUM OPlNION AND ORI)ER Upon Defena’ants ’ Motionfor Summary Jua'gment, DENIED. Thornas E. Brown, Esquire, Edward K. Black, Esquire (argued

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, ex rel. WILLIAM SEAN FRENCH, Vl ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) C.A. No. N13C-06-289 PRW CCLD ) ) ) CARD COMPLIANT, LLC, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: January 16, 2018 Decided: April 30, 2018 Withdrawn and Reissued With Clariflcations: August 29, 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORD_ER Upon Defendants ’ Motionfor Summary Jua’gment, DENIED. Thomas E. Brown, Esquire, Edward K. Black, Esquire (argued),

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) P'laintiff, ) ex rel. ) ) WILLIAM SEAN FRENCH, ) ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) C.A. No. N13C-06-289 PRW CCLD ) v. ) ) CARD COMPLIANT, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Submitted: January 16, 2018 Decided: April 3(), 2018 MEMORAHDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Defendants ’ Motionfor Summary Judgment, DENIED. Thomas E. Brown, Esquire, Edward K. Black, Esquire (argued), Stephen G. MacDonald, Esquire, Deputy Attorneys General, Delaware

MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. Defendants Complete Payment Recovery Services, Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services (collectively, “the defendants”) move to dismiss Sandra Zari-chnys first amended complaint and strike the putative class action claims she brings under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Telephone Consumer Pr

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, ex rel. ) ) ) ) ) WILLIAM SEAN FRENCH ) Plaintiff-Relawr, ) C.A. No. N13C-06-289 PRW CCLD ) ) ) ) ) ) v. CARD COMPLIANT, LLC, et al., Defendants. Submitted: January 24, 2017 Decided: April 21 , 2017 MEMORANDUM OPIN|ON AND ORDER Upon Defendants, Ralph Lauren Corp., Ruth ’s Hospitalily Group, Inc., and Shell Oil Co. ’s Motions to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, GRANTED. Thomas E. Brow

669 F.3d 359 (2012) AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC., Appellant v. Andrew P. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF, as Treasurer of the State of New Jersey; Steven R. Harris, as Administrator of Unclaimed Property of the State of New Jersey. No. 10-4328. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued September 12, 2011. Filed: January 5, 2012.

302 F.Supp.2d 654 (2004) Betty D. RUSSELL, et al., v. CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, INC., et al. Nos. Civ.A. 03-1994, Civ.A. 03-2040. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 28, 2004. *655 *656 *657 Dawn Adams Wheelahan, Attorney at Law, New Orleans,

2005 WY 130 DIAMOND B SERVICES, INC., Appellant (Petitioner), v. LAWRENCE ROHDE, Appellee (Respondent). LAWRENCE ROHDE, Appellant (Defendant), v. DIAMOND B SERVICES, INC., Appellee (Plaintiff). Nos. 04-258, 04-259 Supreme Court of Wyoming. OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2005. October 6, 2005. Representing Diamond B Services, Inc., Terry W. Connolly of Patton & D

Donovan, J. The plaintiff, Ray Tek Services, Inc. (Ray Tek), filed this action claiming a breach of fiduciary duty (Count II), conversion (Count III) and breach of contract (Count IV) against the defendant, David W. Parker (Mr. Parker) in his individual capacity, d/b/a North Atlantic Imaging. Ray Tek alleges a breach of contract (Count V) against North Atlantic Imaging Systems, Inc. (NAIS). As to both defendants, Ray Tek seeks a

209 B.R. 712 (1997) In re Patrick and Janet SZIEL, Debtors. AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP., Plaintiff, v. Patrick M. SZIEL, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96 B 15237, Adv. No. 96 A 01294. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 11, 1997. *713 Lawrence Korrub, Feld & Korrub, Chicago, IL, fo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this proposed national class action, plaintiffs allege that First DataBank, Inc. and McKesson Corporation engaged in a racketeering enterprise to fraudulently state the “average wholesale price” for numerous prescription pharmaceuticals beginning in late 2001, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1964 and California state

590 N.W.2d 176 (1999) 256 Neb. 228 PRODATA COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Ronald E. PONEC, an individual, defendant and third-party plaintiff, appellant, and Marion R. Wamsat and Joseph Alan Hartley, individuals, third-party defendants, appellees. No. S-97-1114. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 19, 1999.

71 F.Supp.2d 47 (1999) Deborah RIZZO-PUCCIO, Plaintiff, v. COLLEGE AUXILIARY SERVICES, INC., William F. Long, III, State University of New York and Johanna D'Aleo, Defendants. No. 98-CV-0741. United States District Court, N.D. New York. October 8, 1999. *48 *49 *5

629 F.Supp.2d 351 (2009) ING BANK, FSB (d/b/a ING Direct) and, ING Direct Bancorp, Plaintiffs, v. The PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., PNC Bank, National Association, and PNC Bank, Delaware, Defendants. Civ. No. 08-514-GMS-LPS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 22, 2009. *352 Francis DiGiovanni & Chad S.C. St

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed