Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case
via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “First Ashtabula Mining Co. v. Green”
Ohio Supreme Court · 1994-12-03 · Published · cited 6× · 1994 Ohio 21; 69 Ohio St. 3d 149
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 149.] KIEL, APPELLANT, v. GREEN LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 1994-Ohio-21.] Schools—Teachers—Nonrenewal of limited teaching contract—R.C. 3319.11 does not provide procedure that must be followed in an appeal pursuant to subdivision (G)(7)—Procedural provisions of R.C. Chapter 2506
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015-03-10 · Published · cited 23× · 91 F. Supp. 3d 940; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29200; 2015 WL 1038082
OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Little Hocking Water Association, Inc. (“Little Hocking” or “Plaintiff’) seeks partial summary judgment on its Trespass (Count IV) and Conversion (Count VI) claims against E.I. du Pont Nemours and Company (“DuPont” or “Defend
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 771 F.2d 762
OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. In this consolidated appeal, Pinney Dock & Transport Company (“Pinney”), Litton Industries, Inc., Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Great Lakes Corporation, and Erie Marine, Inc. (“Litton”) appeal from final bankruptcy orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court denied their petition for leave to
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885-01-05 · Published · cited 16× · 108 Pa. 55; 1885 Pa. LEXIS 292
Mr. Justice Trunkey delivered the opinion of the court, January 5th, 1885. . This action is upon a contract dated February. 16th, 1882, struck by the plaintiffs’ acceptance of the following proposition : “We have tried the West Republic ore lately sent us, and find it satisfactory. We will take (5000) five thousand tons of it, at $10 per ton, at Ashtabula. Payments to be made for five hundred tons per month, begi
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 572 F.2d 1150
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. This court now has before it 23 petitions involving 32 companies filed against the United States Environmental Protection Agency which levy a variety of complaints against the federal agency's imposition of a sulfur dioxide (SO2) pollution control plan for industrial discharges into Ohio’s ambient air. The issues, which have been extensively briefed and argued, divide into general legal and procedural
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1896-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 6 Ohio N.P. 350
Hunt, J. The agreed statement of facts recites that the defendant is a corporation under the laws of the state of New York, having no agent or place of *351business in the state of Ohio; that the J. A. Fay & Egan Company, the garnishee herein, is a corporation under the Jaws of the state of West Virginia, having its principal office in Cincinnati, Ohio, and also a
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907-07-12 · Published · cited 2× · 79 Neb. 587; 113 N.W. 245; 1907 Neb. LEXIS 428
Epperson, C. In February, 1897, certain citizens of Schuyler, Nebraska, united in a movement for the organization of a company for the manufacture of chicory at that place. Articles of incorporation were prepared and discussed on one or more occasions by the interested parties, and during said month a written agreement, of which the following is a copy, was prepared and circulated and signed by a considerable number of persons,
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-07-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2013 Ohio 3276
[Cite as HRM, L.L.C. v. Shopsmith, Inc., 2013-Ohio-3276.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY HRM, LLC, dba EXTENDED STAY HOTELS Plaintiff-Appellee v. SHOPSMITH, INC. Defendant-Appellant Appellate Case No. 25374 Trial Court Case No. 2010-CVF-179 (Civil Appeal from (Municipal Court)
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ohio 1848
[Cite as State v. Hall, 2019-Ohio-1848.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-T-0069 - vs - : HARGUS DENNISON
In Re Lower Lake Erie Iron Ore Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 587). (Nineteen Cases). Wills Trucking, Inc. Consolidated Dock and Storage, Inc. Toledo World Terminal, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02010). Wills Trucking, Inc. And Toledo World Terminal, Inc., in 91-1526. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1586. Wills Trucking, Inc. Consolidated Dock and Storage, Inc. Toledo World Terminal, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02010). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1587. C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Co., Inc. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02012). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1588. Republic Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company and the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02079). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1589. National Steel Corporation v. Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (Civil No. 84-02134). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1590. Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02135). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1591. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02138). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1592. Tauro Brothers Trucking Co. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Inc. v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02781). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1593. Sharon Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-05562). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1594. Erie Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Inc. And the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-05760). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1595. C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Co., Inc. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02012). C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Company ("Ambrosia"), in 91-1627. Republic Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company and the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02079). Republic Steel Corporation in 91-1628. National Steel Corporation v. Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02134). National Steel Corporation, in 91-1629. Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated v. The Penn Central Corporation, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02135). Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated, in 91-1630. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02138). Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, in 91-1631. Tauro Brothers Trucking Co. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Inc. v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02781). Tauro Brothers Trucking Company, in 91-1632. Sharon Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-05562). Sharon Steel Corporation, in No. 91-1633. Erie Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Inc. And the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-05760). Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation ("Erie"), in 91-1634public domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993-07-26 · Published · cited 177× · 998 F.2d 1144
998 F.2d 1144 In re LOWER LAKE ERIE IRON ORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL No.587). (Nineteen Cases).WILLS TRUCKING, INC.; Consolidated Dock and Storage, Inc.;Toledo World Terminal, Inc.v.BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.; Bessemer & LakeErie Railroad, Inc.; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company,Inc.; CSX Corporation; Consolidated Rail Corporation;Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc.; Pittsburg
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-01-29 · Published · cited 6× · 2021 Ohio 246
[Cite as Lucas v. Byers, 2021-Ohio-246.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO JASON C. LUCAS, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NOS. 2020-L-010 - vs - :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-11-05 · Published · cited 18× · 162 N.E.3d 153; 2020 Ohio 5180
[Cite as Cleveland v. Bright, 2020-Ohio-5180.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF CLEVELAND, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108989 v. : ASIA S. BRIGHT, :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-12-09 · Published · cited 16× · 2016 Ohio 8081
[Cite as State v. Richardson, 2016-Ohio-8081.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 26649 : v.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 3× · 2013 Ohio 5825
[Cite as Vinecourt Landscaping v. Kleve, 2013-Ohio-5825.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO VINECOURT LANDSCAPING INC., et al., : OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, : CASE NO. 2013-G-3142 - vs -
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 836 F. Supp. 2d 100; 192 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2835; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145784; 2011 WL 6337683
MEMORANDUM & ORDER KORMAN, District Judge. On November 13, 2007, Joe Santo (“Santo”), Mark Palumbo (“Palumbo”), Joe *102Germano (“Germano”), John Aquista (“Aquista”), Glenn Semioli (“Semioli”), and Rosario Prato (“Prato”) (collectively “the plaintiffs”) filed the instant action against Laborers’ International Union of North America (
Ohio Court of Claims · 2017-07-07 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 Ohio 7156
[Cite as Colaianni Constr., Inc. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm., 2017-Ohio-7156.] COLAIANNI CONSTRUCTION, INC. Case No. 2017-00063 Plaintiff Referee Dale A. Crawford v. DECISION OF THE REFEREE OHIO SCHOOL FACILITIES COMMISSION Defendant {¶1} Before the Court are three motions for the Court’s determination in this case arising from a dispute concern
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-12-31 · Published · cited 8× · 2015 Ohio 5519
[Cite as Berger v. Berger, 2015-Ohio-5519.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO SANDRA L. BERGER, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2014-G-3191 - vs - : THEODORE J. BERGER, J
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Adams County · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 35× · 110 N.E.3d 1; 2018 Ohio 1278
McFarland, J. {¶ 1} Denny W. Blanton, Jr., appeals the judgment entry on sentence filed November 9, 2016 in the Adams County Court of Common Pleas. Blanton was convicted by a jury on three counts: (1) kidnapping, in violation of R.C. 2905.01(B) (2) ; (2) felonious assault, in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A) (1) ; and (3) assault, in violation of *9R.C.
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011-11-01 · Published · cited 30× · 403 S.C. 411; 743 S.E.2d 746
Justice BEATTY. Robert L. Buchanan, Jr. and Adele J. Pope (“Appellants”), formerly personal representatives for The Estate of James Brown and trustees of The James Brown 2000 Irrevocable Trust, appeal from circuit court orders that (1) approved a settlement agreement pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 62-3-1102 (2009) of pending litigation concerning the estate; and (2) removed Appellants from their fiduciary positions and appointed
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-02-28 · Published · cited 104× · 27 F.4th 419
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0037p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SALVATORE PALMA, JR., individually and as │ administrat