Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIRMENICH INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N19C-01-320 MMJ [CCLD] v. ) ) NATURAL FLAVORS, INC., HARRIS ) FILED UNDER SEAL STEIN, HEBERT STEIN, JASON ) STEIN, JOCELYN MANSHIP, and ) JULIE WEISMAN, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge. This action involves federal, state, and common law claims and counterclaims by and between Jean Claude Delville (“Plaintiff” or “Delville”) and his former employer, Firmenich Incorporated (“Defendant,” “the Company,” or “Firmenich”). Delville claims that Firmenich (1) discriminated against him on the basis of his age, in violation of the Age

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This case was tried before a jury from November 5 through November 13, 2013. On November 14, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Jean Claude Del-ville and Defendant Firmenich Incorporated (“Firmenich”) on their respective breach of contract claims, and against Del-ville on his age discrimination and' retaliation claims. Delville ha

*229Opinion by Oliver, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 CCPA 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

*224Opinion by Oliver, O.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Opinion by Oliver, C. J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Memorandum Opinion Restani, Judge: The judgment in this action awarded plaintiff $8,281.87, “together with interest and costs as provided by law.” U.S. Shoe Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 95-197 (Dec. 4, 1995); see also U.S. Shoe Corp. v. United States, 907 F. Supp. 408 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1995). It has come to the court’s attention that “interest” is not a matter without controversy

Evans, Judge: This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto. It is HEREBY stiphlated and agreed, by and between the attorneys for the respective parties, that the merchandise described in and covered by the above reappraisement consists of methyl anthranilate, a coal-tar aromatic chemical, exported from Switzerland on September 29, 1938; that it

*481Opinion by Mollison, J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in United States v. Dodge & Olcott, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

868 F.2d 621 57 USLW 2529, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544,13 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 2040,1989 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 28,450 NEW JERSEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Chemical Industry Council ofNew Jersey, New Jersey Business and Industry Association,Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association, Inc., Merck& Co., Inc., Magnesium Elektron, Inc., CP Chemicals Inc.,Chem-Mark, Inc., Exxon Chemicals Americas, a division of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................853 A. Factual Background.................................................853 1. The parties and principal actors................

DECISION and ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge In this longstanding case, plaintiffs seek pension benefits, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq., from defendants Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan (“Plan”), and the Plan administrator. For the purposes of this Decision and Or

HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge INTRODUCTION This case involves a dispute between a company, its former employee, and a competing company that hired the former employee. Plaintiff Mastercraft Decorators, Inc., brought this complaint against the former employee, Randy Orlando, and the competing company, Grandstand Glassware and Apparel, alleging eight claims for (1) tortious interference with

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge. In this bankruptcy appeal, a group of people who were exposed to a disease-causing chemical that was manufactured and sold by the reorganized debtors challenge an order of the Bankruptcy Court enjoining them from bringing state tort actions. For the reasons that follow, the Order of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEVY FAMILY INVESTORS, LLC; ) LFP RIVER WEST INVESTORS, LLC, ) SERIES 35; MICHAEL WALLACH AS ) TRUSTEE OF THE MICHAEL ) WALLACH TRUST U/A/D 02/26/2012; ) SOPHIA STRATTON AND RICHARD ) NOVAK AS TRUSTEES OF THE ) STRATTON NOVAK JOINT ) REVOCABLE TRUST DATED ) DECEMBER 15, 2016,