Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00413-CV ___________________________ DAVID RICE, Appellant V. MELINDA RICE, Appellee On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-643350-18 Before Bassel, Womack, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

[Cite as Cruse v. Finley, 2012-Ohio-5465.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY WENDELL L. CRUSE, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Case No: 12CA2 : v. :

LOLLEY, J. |,In this slip and fall case, plaintiff, Karen Finley, appeals a judgment from the *195First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana, granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, New United Petroleum, Inc. and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (collectively, “Racetrac”). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court

10/31/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 19, 2022 JAMES FRANKLIN BYRD v. VALERIE FINLEY BYRD v. BYRD BROTHERS, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003838-16 Robert Samual Weiss, Judge

17 Kan. App. 2d 246 (1992) 838 P.2d 904 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. DONALD E. FINLEY, Appellee. No. 66,658 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed April 10, 1992. Thomas J. Bath and Robb Edmonds, assistant district attorneys, Paul J. Morrison, district attorney, and Robert T. Stephan, attorney general, for app

March 7, 1906. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The question presented by this appeal is whether a father who, as executor, had in his hands a legacy bequeathed to his infant daughter, has the right to set up as a counter-claim sums expended for her maintenance, when sued by her to recover said legacy, on the ground that he had been previously absolved from legal liability to support his daughter. The facts out of which the controversy arose are thus stated in the decree of his Honor

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 18 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 February 8, 2024 RONALD PINTHER, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. S-23-0133 AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and PHILIP MAGGAR

ON MOTIONS TO MODIFY, FOR A REHEARING AND TO TRANSFER TO BANC. Respondent, Finley, has filed motions to modify, for a rehearing, and to transfer to Banc. The issues presented overlap; for instance, the motion to modify presents issues (also found in the motion for rehearing) which would necessitate a rehearing if sustained, and the motion for rehearing presents issues (also found in the motion to modify) which would require only a modification of the opinion if sustained. We

779 S.W.2d 771 (1989) Richard Everett RICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. 16137. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. November 15, 1989. Kimberly Bonney Landman, Asst. Public Defender, Springfield, for appellant. William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent. <

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In 1998, the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida held a trial—Phase I of the Engle class action—to determine whether the largest domestic tobacco companies (the- “Engle defendants”) engaged *1192in conduct proscribed by Florida tort law.1

GLICKSTEIN, Judge, concurring specialty- I write to elaborate on the facts and the law of this case. Under a three-way contract, William E. Rice, the plaintiff/appellant, was employed by Cities Sewer as vice president and general manager, subject to Gladys M. Pugh’s direction. On June 17, 1983, Cities Sewer terminated Rice. On June 22, 1983, Cities Sewer filed a replevin action against

PICKETT, Circuit Judge. These proceedings are here on petitions to review decisions of the Tax Court relating to the members of an Oklahoma family partnership referred to as “Fos-co”.1 5901 involves income tax deficiencies of Robert Wesley Finley2 for the years 1946, 1947, 1948 and 1949. The remaining petitions were filed by the Commissioner to protect the revenue, and

569 F.2d 527 1978-1 Trade Cases 61,978 CHARLES O. FINLEY & CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bowie K. KUHN et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-2008. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 23, 1978.Decided April 7, 1978. Neil Papiano, Donald M. Robbins

This is an action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with the mortgagee's right to the possession of the mortgaged property. It came on for hearing on an order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue and after the hearing the trial judge held that "any contract made between mortgagor and mortgagee, giving the mortgagee . . . the right to collect the rents, is valid . . ." when the period of redemption is not involved. A temporary injunction was ordered. Thereaf

398 S.W.2d 805 (1966) STATE BANKING BOARD and Northline State Bank, Appellants, v. AIRLINE NATIONAL BANK, Appellee. No. 11365. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 26, 1966. Rehearing Denied February 16, 1966. *806 Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., T. B. Wright, Ex

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. The federal income tax liability of the Finley family for the years 1943-1945 is here for review. In No. 5734, the petitioner asserts that the Tax Court erred in holding that certain income was that of a partnership composed of petitioner and J. Floyd Frazier although such income was paid to their wives

265 F.2d 885 59-1 USTC P 9422 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,v.R. E. L. FINLEY, Respondent.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,v.Jerline Dick FINLEY, Respondent.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,v.R. E. L. FINLEY and Jerline Dick Finley, Respondents.Robert Wesley FINLEY, Petitioner,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.COMMISSION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–2039 Submitted December 15, 2020—Filed March 5, 2021 RICHARD J. WERMERSKIRCHEN and CAROL M. WERMERSKIRCHEN, Appellants, vs. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD, a/k/a CN, a/k/a CN RAILWAY, CHICAGO, CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a/k/a CCP, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, TIM DORSEY, and JOSH VOKEM, Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: Pennzoil Company (“Pennzoil”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas, appeals an order of the Southern District of New York, 626 F.Supp. 250, Brieant, Judge, granting to Texaco Inc. (“Texaco”), a Delaware corporation based in New York, a preliminary injunction restraining Pennzoil from seeking to enfo

The action is ejectment for a piece of quarry land in the town of Pittsford. The defendant's answer contains the general issue and asserts title by adverse possession. The trial below was before a referee, on whose report judgment was rendered for the recovery of a part, only, of the premises in question. The plaintiff brings the case here on exceptions. The case was argued in this Court at the May Term, 1923, and when, at our last May Term, an opinion was handed down which reversed and reman