⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Finke v. Asset Acceptance, LLC”

District Court, C.D. California · 2011-03-15 · Published · cited 3× · 448 B.R. 517; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41045; 2011 WL 1345017
448 B.R. 517 (2011) FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 10-CV-09105 MRP (MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 15, 2011. *519 Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Derek W. Loeser, Amy Williams-Derry, Elizabeth A. Leland, Seattle, WA, Gary A. Gotto, Keller R
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-10-26 · Published · cited 2× · 198 N.Y.S.3d 810; 220 A.D.3d 1139; 2023 NY Slip Op 05432
RSRNC, LLC v Wilson (2023 NY Slip Op 05432) RSRNC, LLC v Wilson 2023 NY Slip Op 05432 Decided on October 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. </
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-04-11 · Published · cited 21× · 384 F. Supp. 3d 392
DENISE COTE, United States District Judge Defendants Costella Kirsch, Internap Corporation ("INAP"), Blue Chip Venture Company Ltd.1 and Blue Chip VI Extension Fund II LLC (the "Blue Chip Defendants"), have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P., to dismiss the claims against them in the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). INAP and the Blue Chip Defendants have additionally moved to dismiss the
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1123 ____________ NRA GROUP, LLC v. NICOLE DURENLEAU; JAMIE BADACZEWSKI _________________________________________________ NICOLE DURENLEAU v. NRA GROUP, LLC; STEVE KUSIC; SHELL SHARMA _____________
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1123 ____________ NRA GROUP, LLC v. NICOLE DURENLEAU; JAMIE BADACZEWSKI _________________________________________________ NICOLE DURENLEAU v. NRA GROUP, LLC; STEVE KUSIC; SHELL SHARMA _________________________________
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 327 F. Supp. 3d 1322
Derrick K. Watson, United States District Judge *1327INTRODUCTION Irongate seeks summary judgment on the Sunday's Companies'1 remaining claims for breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment, as well as on its own Counterclaim for breach of contract arising out of the failure o
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2022-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-17-00046-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARSHA ELLISON D/B/A ELLISON LEASE OPERATING, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. THREE RIVERS ACQUISITION LLC; THREE RIVERS OPERATING CO. LLC; CONCHO RESOURCES, INC.; COG OPERATING, LLC, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, SAMSON RESOURCES CO.; SAMSON LONE STAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 IL App (1st) 160933
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2022-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-17-00046-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARSHA ELLISON D/B/A ELLISON LEASE OPERATING, Appellant, v. SAMSON RESOURCES CO.; SAMSON LONE STAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SAMSON LONE STAR LLC; SAMSON EXPLORATION, LLC; THREE RIVERS ACQUISITION LLC; THREE RIVERS OPERATING CO. LLC; CONCHO RESOURCES, INC.; COG OPERATING, LLC, S/D
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13381 ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL LLC vs. SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH &
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-02-04 · Published · cited 35× · 915 F.3d 88
Debra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Gary W. Richards ("Richards") entered into an electricity contract with Defendant-Appellee Direct Energy Services, LLC ("Direct Energy"). The contract provided that, for the first twelve months, Direct Energy would guarantee Richards a fixed electricity rate that was 10% below the state-approved rate. But if Richards did not leave the contract at the end of that year, Direct
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 15× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 685
GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE This case involves claims for breach of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs Steve Wildman ("Wildman") and Jon Borcherding ("Borcherding"), participants in the America
New York Supreme Court · 2013-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 39 Misc. 3d 649
OPINION OF THE COURT Carolyn E. Demarest, J. A bench trial in this action seeking damages under alternative theories of breach of contract, negligence, indemnification, restitution, a “wrongfully filed mechanic’s lien” and counterclaims of breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment was commenced on July 30, 2012 and concluded on September 20, 2012. This action was joined for trial with the related
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., RICKMAN, P. J., and DAVIS, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 23, 2025
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-05-26 · Published · cited 5× · 156 F. Supp. 3d 1105; 2015 WL 9695307
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 8, 2014, Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC (“Aliya”) filed, this action against Robert P. Nickell, Comprehensive Toxicology Billing, LLC (“CTB”), Exec Billing Services, LLC (“Exec Billing”) (collectively “defendants”), and various fictitious defendants.1
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-05-28 · Published · cited 22× · 947 F. Supp. 2d 390; 20 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1305; 2013 WL 2355521; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75313
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Nadgia Dixon brings this action on her own behalf and on behalf of a *393putative class of employees of defendants NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBCU”) and Oxygen Media, LLC (“Oxygen”), alleging that defendants failed to compensate her for overtime wages, in violation of the F
California Court of Appeal · 2024-09-05 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/5/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO FOX PAINE & COMPANY, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs and A168803 Appellants, (San Francisco County v. Super. Ct. No. TWIN CITY FIRE
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-07-18 · Published · cited 12× · 252 So. 3d 546
KEATY, Judge. In this oilfield legacy litigation, Plaintiff appeals the trial court's judgment granting motions for summary judgment and an exception of no right of action in favor of Defendants. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment is affirmed. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY This mineral law case involves forty acres of immovable property located in Jefferson Dav
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-08-17 · Published · cited 2× · 888 F. Supp. 2d 577; 2012 WL 3550022; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116271
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FELIPE L. RESTREPO, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff in this case, Legendary Art, LLC (“Legendary Art”), brings claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment against Defendants Michael Godard (“Godard”), Michael Godard Fine Art Enterprises, Inc. (“MGFA Enterprises”), Michael Godard Fine Art Associates (“MGFA Associates”), and Michael Godard LLC (“MG LLC”). Pres
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009-09-21 · Published · cited 3× · 417 B.R. 495; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3039; 2009 WL 3007869
417 B.R. 495 (2009) In re ARTS DAIRY, LLC, Debtor. Robert McComber, Plaintiff, v. Arts Dairy, LLC, et al., Defendant(s). Nos. 09-3080, 09-32386. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. September 21, 2009. *498 Steven L. Diller, Van Wert, OH, for Plaintiff. Nathan A. Hall, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Toledo,