⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.”

Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009-09-30 · Published · cited 2× · 684 S.E.2d 682; 300 Ga. App. 272; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3186; 70 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 21; 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 1146
684 S.E.2d 682 (2009) 300 Ga. App. 272 CONSUMER SOLUTIONS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. HERITAGE BANK. No. A09A1562. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 30, 2009. *683 Brown & Gill, Angela B. Dillon, Max C. Richardson Jr., for appellant. Bryan, Cave, Powell & Goldstein, William B. Brockman,
District Court, D. Colorado · 2013-04-29 · Published · cited 1× · 942 F. Supp. 2d 1148; 2013 WL 1815894; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60746
ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3). [docket #21], For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. FACTS In November 2009 Mass Engineered Design, Inc., a Canadian corporation, and Jerry Mo
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014-03-24 · Published · cited 3× · 8 F. Supp. 3d 1039; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38780; 2014 WL 1233461
Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment DEBRA McVICKER LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge. This lawsuit concerns Allstate Insurance Company’s obligations to the defendants with respect to a class action lawsuit filed in Georgia against the defendants and others (the “Underlying Litigation”). Allstate has moved for judgment as a matter of law that its insurance policies do not provide
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015-05-01 · Published · cited 7× · 415 U.S. App. D.C. 85; 785 F.3d 684; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7229; 2015 WL 1947469
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 19, 2014 Decided May 1, 2015 No. 13-5342 MORGAN DREXEN, INC. AND KIMBERLY A. PISINSKI, APPELLANTS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:13-cv-0
District Court, D. Oregon · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 13× · 260 F. Supp. 3d 1345
OPINION & ORDER HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc., (Plaintiff or GEM), brings this contract-based action against Defendant International- Business Machines Corp., (Defendant or IBM), seeking payment for work performed by Richard Clyne, ' one - of GEM’s owners. Plaintiff brings claims of breach of express contract, breach of the implied duty of good fai
California Court of Appeal · 2012-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 205 Cal. App. 4th 506; 140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 347; 2012 WL 1416619; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 487
Opinion KITCHING, J. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Kinecta Alternative Financial Solutions, Inc. (Kinecta), petitions for writ of mandate or prohibition to set aside an order denying Kinecta’s request for dismissal of class claims from the complaint filed by plaintiff Kim Malone. When Kinecta hired Malone, she signed a provision that Kinecta and Malone would arbitrate disputes arising out of
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-08-23 · Published · cited 545× · 901 F.3d 619
CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Howard Pittman ("Pittman") sued two mortgage servicers, iServe Servicing, Inc. ("iServe") and Servis One, Inc., d/b/a BSI Financial Services ("BSI"), for negligent and willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n and 1681o. He also sued BSI for breach of contract. Pittman appeals from several decisions entered
District Court, D. Colorado · 2009-03-31 · Published · cited 5× · 622 F. Supp. 2d 1077; 48 A.L.R. 6th 695; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31729; 2009 WL 890689
622 F.Supp.2d 1077 (2009) Robert A. DOLIN; and Lisa Dolin, Plaintiffs, v. CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.; and Mutual Service Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00675-WYD-BNB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 31, 2009. *1079 Robert T. Lego, Lego Law Firm, Englewood, CO, for Plaintiffs. C
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-06-23 · Published · cited 6× · 2023 IL App (1st) 220533
2023 IL App (1st) 220533 No. 1-22-0533 June 23, 2023 Sixth Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015-03-06 · Published · cited 2× · 219 F. Supp. 3d 878; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28254; 2015 WL 1013508
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 15], filed on April 28, 2014 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2301 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2301 DARRELL J. AUSTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., De
Alaska Supreme Court · 2021-06-18 · Published · cited 6× · 488 P.3d 979
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA RESQSOFT, INC., ) ) Supreme Co
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019-06-14 · Published · cited 136× · 828 S.E.2d 467; 372 N.C. 326
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 251PA18 Filed 14 June 2019 SUSAN SYKES d/b/a ADVANCED CHIROPRACTIC AND HEALTH CENTER, DAWN PATRICK, TROY LYNN, LIFEWORKS ON LAKE NORMAN, PLLC, BRENT BOST, and BOST CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.A. v. HEALTH NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. f/k/a CHIROPRACTIC NETWORK OF THE CAROLINAS, INC., MICHAEL BINDER, STEVEN BINDER, ROBERT STROUD, JR., LARRY GROSMAN, MATTHEW SCHMID, RA
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-11-21 · Published · cited 13× · 61 F. Supp. 3d 306; 2014 WL 6611531
OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) dated March 6, 2014 of Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith, to whom this matter was referred for an inquest as to damages following default judgments against the Defendants. This action involves numerous plaintiffs, numerous defendants, and assorted causes of action under federal and state
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 67× · 881 F.3d 75
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Tatel, with whom Circuit Judges Millett and Pillard join. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Wilkins, with whom Circuit Judge Rogers joins. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge Griffith. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Henderson. Dissenting op
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-06-29 · Published · cited 667× · 591 U.S. 197; 140 S. Ct. 2183; 207 L. Ed. 2d 494
B Neither Humphrey's Executor nor Morrison resolves whether the CFPB Director's insulation from removal is constitutional. Start with Humphrey's Executor. Unlike the New Deal-era FTC upheld there, the CFPB is led by a single Director who cannot be described as a "body of experts" and cannot be considered "non-partisan" in the same sens
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-02-17 · Published · cited 18× · 235 F. Supp. 3d 194; 2017 WL 663528; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22980
MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; Granting in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for an Injunction Pending an Opportunity To Petition the Court of Appeals for a Stay RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-10-11 · Published · cited 52× · 839 F.3d 1; 2016 WL 5898801; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18332
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2016 Decided October 11, 2016 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB File 2014-CFPB-0002)
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-659 Filed: September 27, 2022 Re-issued: October 18, 20221 ________________________________________ ) HOMELAND SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
08/14/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 19, 2019 Session MILAN SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS INC. F/K/A MILAN EXPRESS INC. v. NAVISTAR INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-14-285 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge