Cases

OPINION Justice BAER. These appeals involve a declaratory judgment action filed by Lisa Kinney-Lindstrom (“Mother”) against the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund (“MCARE Fund”). Mother seeks a ruling as to the number of “occurrences” for which the MCARE Fund is liable based on allegations that her physician failed to diagnose in a timely manner discrete in útero infections suffere

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is *122remanded for judgment in favor of Appellant. See Yussen v. MCARE Fund, 616 Pa. 108, 46 A.3d 685 (2012). Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the decision of this case.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for judgment in favor of Appellant. See Yussen v. MCARE Fund, — Pa.-, 46 A.3d 685 (2012). Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the decision of this case. Justice EAKIN files a dissenting statement

2022 UT App 31 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS BRETT ERROR, Appellee, v. MICHAEL J. BENAROYA AND BD&P COMPANY LLC, Appellants. Opinion No. 20200688-CA Filed March 10, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable James R. Taylor

NUMBER 13-20-00437-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE BENCHMARK FILING & SHELVING SYSTEMS, INC. AND WILLIAM MORRIS On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and

ORDER Pursuant to Art. V., § 4 of the South Carolina Constitution, the attached Electronic Filing Policies and Guidelines are hereby adopted by this Court. These Policies and Guidelines will govern E-Filing during the Pilot Program in the Court of Common Pleas, and will be effective upon the adoption of E-Filing on a county-by-county basis as set forth in future Administrative Orders of this Court. s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

IN RE: AMENDMENT TO OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.301, FORM 5 PETITION IN ERROR2023 OK 94Decided: 09/25/2023IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 94, __ P.3d __ ORDER Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.301, Form 5 (Petition in Error), 12 O.S., ch.

IN RE: AMENDMENT TO OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.301, FORM 5 PETITION IN ERROR2023 OK 94Decided: 09/25/2023IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 94, __ P.3d __ ORDER Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.301, Form 5 (Petition in Error), 12 O.S., ch. 15, app. 1, is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhib

IN RE: AMENDMENT TO OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.301, FORM 5 PETITION IN ERROR2023 OK 94Decided: 09/25/2023IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 94, __ P.3d __ ORDER Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.301, Form 5 (Petition in Error), 12 O.S., ch.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2022 VT 53

OSCN Found Document:IN RE: AMENDMENT TO OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.301, FORM 5 PETITION IN ERROR Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print

39 A.3d 551 (2012) Saul D. WOLFSON, M.D., Petitioner v. MEDICAL CARE AVAILABILITY AND REDUCTION OF ERROR FUND, Respondent. No. 317 M.D. 2010 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs July 8, 2011. Decided February 7, 2012. *552 John S. Bagby, Jr., Paoli, for petitioner. Cindy E. Sheaffer, Har

Justice EAKIN, dissenting. I disagree with the majority that the filing of a praecipe for a writ of summons, without service thereof upon the parties, is insufficient to comprise the making of a claim for purposes of § 715 of the MCARE Act. A medical professional liability claim shall be defended by the Insurance Department and paid by the MCARE fund if: (1) the claim is made more than four years after

OPINION BY Senior Judge COLINS. This case is a Petition for Review filed by Aria Health (Hospital), a hospital formerly known as Frankford Hospital, and Aria Health Physician Services (AHPS) (collectively, Petitioners) seeking reversal of a decision of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund (the Fund) that denied their request for coverage under the Medical Care Availability and Reduction o

17 A.3d 422 (2011) Phillip S. YUSSEN, M.D., Petitioner v. MEDICAL CARE AVAILABILITY AND REDUCTION OF ERROR FUND, Respondent. No. 400 M.D. 2010. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 7, 2010. Decided January 4, 2011. Publication Ordered March 24, 2011. *423 Paul R. Walker, Harrisburg

Before the Court is what was originally an appeal of Polyclinic Medical Center (Hospital) from the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund's (Mcare) denial of professional liability insurance to Hospital with regard to a claim filed by Elise Lyon, a psychiatric unit patient (Patient), against Hospital following an injury Patient allegedly suffered at the hands of another of Hospital's patients, Travis Zang (Zang). Before the Insurance Commissioner could issue a determina

36 A.3d 628 (2011) HIGHLAND PARK CARE CENTER, Petitioner v. MEDICAL CARE AVAILABILITY AND REDUCTION OF ERROR FUND, Respondent. No. 319 M.D. 2010. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 13, 2011. Decided November 17, 2011. Publication Ordered January 31, 2012. Justin G. Weber, Harrisburg, for petitioner. Tawny K.

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON Before this Court in our original jurisdiction is a motion for summary relief (Hospital Motion) filed by Petitioner, Montgomery Hospital and Medical Center (Hospital). Hospital seeks coverage from Respondent, the Bureau of Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund (MCARE Fund) of Hospital's defense expenses in underlying third-party medical malpracti

970 A.2d 1206 (2009) Lisa KINNEY-LINDSTROM as Parent and Natural Guardian of Samantha Lindstrom, a Minor, and Alec Lindstrom, a Minor, and as the Assignee of Dr. S., Petitioner v. MEDICAL CARE AVAILABILITY AND REDUCTION OF ERROR FUND, Successor in Interest to the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund, Respondent. No. 18 M.D. 2007. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

OPINION BY President Judge LEADBETTER. West Penn Allegheny Health System d/b/a Allegheny General Hospital (Allegheny General) has filed an application for summary relief in its declaratory judgment action filed against the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund (MCARE Fund) and Kiana Townes, a minor, in this Court’s original jurisdiction. The MCARE Fund has also filed a cross-application for su