Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARTHA BRENNAN CAMIRE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 24 - 1062 (LLA) ALCOA USA CORP., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Martha Brennan Camire, Craig Jefferson, David Lyn Shepherd, and Daniel Schipper

Case: 24-30554 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-30554 FILED ____________ May 5, 2026

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0028 ══════════ TotalEnergies E&P USA, Inc., Petitioner, v. MP Gulf of Mexico, LLC, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth District of T

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0028 ══════════ TotalEnergies E&P USA, Inc., Petitioner, v. MP Gulf of Mexico, LLC, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Distric

Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. Mission Product Holdings, Inc. (“Mission”) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s November 12, 2015 order granting the Motion for Determination of Applicability and Scope of Mission Product Holdings, Inc,’s Election Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(n)(l)(B) (the “365(n) Motion”) filed by Tempnology LLC, n/k/a Old Cold, LLC (the “Debtor”).1 At issue before th

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non

270 F.Supp.2d 207 (2003) Maria VENEGAS HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PEER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 01-1215(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 20, 2003. *208 Benicio Sanchez-Rivera, Heath W. Hoglund, San Juan, PR, Carlos M. Sanchez-La-Costa, Akerman Senterfitt, Miami, FL, fo

CHIN, J., Concurring and Dissenting. In Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno (2011) 51 Cal.4th 659, 669 [121 Cal.Rptr.3d 58, 247 P.3d 130] (Sonic I), a bare four-to-three majority of this court held that the arbitration provision here at issue is both contrary to our state’s public policy and unconscionable—and therefore unenforceable—to the extent it precludes Frank Moreno from p

Filed 10/23/13 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MAVE ENTERPRISES, INC., B241807 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC0

Opinion MALLANO, P. J. In this case, an insured filed a bad faith action against its insurer in the Los Angeles Superior Court. After spending a substantial amount of time litigating the case in the superior court, the parties stipulated to have their disputes resolved through binding arbitration. The terms of the stipulation were placed on the record, and the superior court retained jurisdiction, requiring

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Margarita Rosado Muñoz David Rosado Núñez Christopher Rosado Goldstone como miembro de la Sucesión Certiorari Julio Rosado del Valle 2016 TSPR 236 Peticionarios 196 DPR ____ v. Sonia Acevedo Marrero Recurrida Número del Caso: CC-2014-1003 Fecha: 23 de noviembre de 2016 Tribunal

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS