⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Fernando Sanchez, Jr.”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-10-02 · Published · cited 36× · 940 F.3d 526
Case: 18-10711 Date Filed: 10/02/2019 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10711 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20524-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERI
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 559; 205 L. Ed. 2d 364
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-09-04 · Published · cited 3× · 693 F.3d 1011; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18570; 2012 WL 3799665
BYBEE, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: In 1997, Fernando Sanchez-Avalos pled no contest to “willfully and unlawfully touching] an intimate part of another person, to wit, JANE DOE, date of birth 02/16/1984,” to gratify his sexual desires. He received a three-year suspended sentence, subject to terms of probation, including not being in the presence of children under sixteen years of age. Reading this recor
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 1× · 508 S.W.3d 752; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12447; 2016 WL 6873052
OPINION James T. Campbell, Justice In an open plea to the court, appellant Fernando Hernandez, Jr., a.k.a. Fernando Junior Hernandez, pled guilty to intoxication manslaughter 1 and failing to render aid after an accident involving death. 2
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 398 F. App'x 211
*213MEMORANDUM ** Edgar Rovidio Ortega-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jur
Sanchez v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 122 F. App'x 297
AMENDED MEMORANDUM*** Fernando Martinez Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of an Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for suspension of deportation. We have partial jurisdiction pursuant to former 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We dismiss in part and deny in part the p
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00187-CR Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of The STA
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-06-26 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jun 26 2020, 12:19 pm court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 79 F. App'x 28
PER CURIAM.* Arnulfo Sanehez-Navarro appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sanehez-Navarro contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate o
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995-03-31 · Published · cited 46× · 50 F.3d 1086; 311 U.S. App. D.C. 134
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. *1087 STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Under the Sentencing Guidelines, punishment for certain economic crimes depends on the value of the loss inflicted. This case involves a dispute as to how to measure the loss cause
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-12-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 9363
Sanchez v Extra Space Stor. Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 09363) Sanchez v Extra Space Stor. Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 09363 Decided on December 26, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Sanchez v. Torrezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 25-2009 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 04/21/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2026