⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Fernando Salinas and Araceli Salinas”

State of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Facilities Commission, for and on Behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; The Texas Facilities Commission; Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Facilities Commission; The Texas Health and Human Services Commission; And Rolland Niles in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. 8317 Cross Park, LLCpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
State of Texas, the Texas Facilities Commission, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the TFC, and Rolland Niles, in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Broadmoor Austin Associates, a Texas Joint Venturepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-12-29 · Published · cited 24× · 591 F.3d 209; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1135; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28588; 2009 WL 5125769
591 F.3d 209 (2009) Sanjuanita SEPULVEDA; Angela Salinas; Jose Sanchez Rivera, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated; David Bailey; Sean Bradham; Clara Bennett; Victor Burgos Rivera; Vence Byrd; Hada Cardenas; Angel Colmenares; Yachira Davila; Hector Esmurria; Garvina Gibbs; Margaret Gibbs; Roger Gonzales; Patricia Gutierrez; Selena Hancock; Cesar Hernandez; Pattie Hinton; William Jackson; Thomas Jacobs; Robin Lott; Maricruz Luyando; Maria
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Granados Navedo v. Rodríguez Estradapublic domain
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990-08-31 · Published · cited 29× · 127 P.R. Dec. 1; 1990 PR Sup. LEXIS 256
El Juez Asociado Señor Alonso Alonso emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Las controversias que tenemos ante nos plantean el derecho al voto de electores calificados, la interpretación de la legislación que dispone el diseño, funcionamiento y administración del sis-tema electoral como instrumento para canalizar la expresión del pueblo, y la función de los tribunales para atender y resolver controversias jurídicas que
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →