⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Fernando Padilla”

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2008-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed April 17, 2008
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 53× · 397 F.3d 1016; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3002; 2005 WL 405892
KANNE, Circuit Judge. - Luis Padilla seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an order of removal. An Immigration Judge (IJ) found Padilla inadmissible because he had been convicted of four crimes involving moral turpitude. Padilla challenged that finding on appeal, and the BIA partially affirmed, determining 'that Padilla’s convictions fo
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-78,357-01, -02 & -03
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-78,357-01, -02 & -03
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,266
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,266 EX PARTE FERNANDO PADILLA, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR32029 IN THE 385 TH CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FROM MIDLAND COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 1
Padilla v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2008-04-17 · Published · cited 33× · 254 S.W.3d 585; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 2719; 2008 WL 1746729
254 S.W.3d 585 (2008) Fernando PADILLA, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 11-06-00230-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. April 17, 2008. *587 David G. Rogers, Fivecoat & Rogers, P.L.L.C., Midland, for appellant. Eric Kalenak, Assistant, Teresa J. Clingman, District Attorney, Midland County District Attor
Clinkscale v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018-05-02 · Published · cited 1× · 550 S.W.3d 49
RITA W. GRUBER, Chief Judge Appellant Adrian Clinkscale appeals from the Pulaski County Circuit Court's August 1, 2017 order and August 23, 2017 amended order, which denied his motion to transfer to juvenile court. He argues that the circuit court's denials of his motion to transfer the case to juvenile court are clearly erroneous. We affirm. On February 15, 2017, appellant was charged in the criminal division of the
White v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 242 S.W.3d 222; 367 Ark. 616; 2006 Ark. LEXIS 544
242 S.W.3d 222 (2006) James WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 06-1187. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 2, 2006. Fernando Padilla, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. Fernando Padilla, a full-time, state-salaried public defender in Pulaski County, the Sixth Judicial District, was appointed to represent appellant, James Whi
Austin v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 Ark. App. 114; 515 S.W.3d 633; 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 128
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge | Appellant Brian Dawayne Austin (DOB: 03-24-00) appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to transfer his case to the juvenile division of circuit court. He argues that the trial court’s denial of his motion to transfer was clearly erroneous. We affirm. Austin was charged, along
Jones v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006-09-21 · Published · cited 2× · 239 S.W.3d 483; 367 Ark. 324; 2006 Ark. LEXIS 440
239 S.W.3d 483 (2006) Moses JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 06-00988. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. Fernando Padilla, II, for appellant. No response. MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK. PER CURIAM. Appellant Moses Jones filed a motion for rule on the clerk to file his record and have his appea
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005-08-08 · Published · cited 3× · 381 F. Supp. 2d 17; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16301; 2005 WL 1875539
381 F.Supp.2d 17 (2005) Edgar PADILLA ROMÁN, et. als., Plaintiffs v. José M HERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ, et als., Defendants. Civil No. 04-1525 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 8, 2005. *18 *19 Fernando L. Gallardo, Woods and Woods, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Jo-Ann Es
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-05-24 · Published · cited 18× · 371 F.3d 713; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10249; 2004 WL 1246011
ORDER TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed February 24, 2004, is hereby replaced with the attached revised opinion. OPINION Defendant Fernando Ceballos-Martinez seeks to appeal his sentence imposed by the district court. Becau
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-06-16 · Published · cited 106× · 387 F.3d 1140; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27587
387 F.3d 1140 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Fernando CEBALLOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-2273. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Filed June 16, 2004. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, (D. Ct. No. CR-01-1155 JC).
Oliver v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002-04-24 · Published · cited 0× · 77 Ark. App. 202; 72 S.W.3d 547; 2002 Ark. App. LEXIS 245
John E. Jennings, Judge. Benjamin Oliver was charged with first-degree murder in connection with the shooting death of George Dove. Prior to trial, the circuit court conducted a Denno hearing after Oliver moved to suppress a statement he gave to the police. The court ruled that Oliver’s statement was admissible and after a jury trial he was found guilty. Oliver was sentenced to sixty years in prison.
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2025-03-05 · Published · cited 0×
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI FERNANDO RAMOS Revisión Administrativa RIVERA Recurrente v. KLRA202500103 Caso núm.:150101 ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO Recurrido Sobre: Reconsideración Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Jueza Ortiz Flores, la Jueza Aldebol Mora y
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994-04-21 · Published · cited 98× · 21 F.3d 970; 94 Daily Journal DAR 5309; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2759; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8104
21 F.3d 970 Oscar PADILLA-AGUSTIN, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 92-70611, 93-70351. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1994.Decided April 21, 1994. Lee A. O'Connor (on brief and argued), San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Leg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-10-31 · Published · cited 131× · 80 A.3d 1238; 622 Pa. 449; 2013 WL 5848693; 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2618
OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. This is a direct appeal from the judgment of sentence of death on three counts of first-degree murder. We affirm the judgment of sentence. In the very early morning hours of August 28, 2005, Appellant fatally shot three men outside of the United Veterans Association (“UVA”), a private social club in Altoona, Blair County, after he and two friends,
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994-08-01 · Published · cited 6× · 641 N.E.2d 572; 204 Ill. Dec. 348; 266 Ill. App. 3d 829
641 N.E.2d 572 (1994) 266 Ill.App.3d 829 204 Ill.Dec. 348 Diocelina Teresa PADILLA et. al., Individually, and as Parents and Next Friends of Fernando Padilla, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. NORWEGIAN-AMERICAN HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Defendants (Norwegian-American Hospital, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellees; Illinois State Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange, Respondent-Appellant). No.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALFONSO PADILLA CUENCA, No. 16-72378 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A088-890-971 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. AMENDED OPINION On Petition for Review of an Order of the