Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Fernandez v. Pique, Inc.”
Mugavero v. ARMS ACRES, INC.public domain
680 F.Supp.2d 544 (2010) Leslie MUGAVERO, Plaintiff, v. ARMS ACRES, INC. and Frederick Hesse, M.D., Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 05724(PGG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 15, 2010. *556 Paula Johnson Kelly, The Law Office of Robert David Goodstein, Esq., New Rochelle, NY, for Plaintiff. Daniel V. Duff, Sc
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Joseph Kornbleuth, DMD v. Thomas Westover (A-71-18) (081898) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 11, 2020 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. The Court revi
Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.public domain
18‐498‐cv (L) Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P. Amended Opinion 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2019 7 8 Nos. 18‐498‐cv (L), 18‐538‐cv (CON) 9 10 MARIA CASTILLO, JAMES COCHRAN, LUIS GOMEZ, BIENBENIDO GUERRA, RICHARD 11 MILLER
SIEMENS BLDG. TECHNOLOGIES v. Jefferson Parishpublic domain
298 F.Supp.2d 415 (2004) SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. JEFFERSON PARISH, et al. No. Civ.A. 03-2272. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 9, 2004. *416 Philip Anthony Franco, Elizabeth N. Anderson, Adams & Reese, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff. Daniel Aubry Ranson, Michael Don Peytavin, Windhor
Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.public domain
18‐498‐cv (L) Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P. 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2019 7 8 Nos. 18‐498‐cv (L), 18‐538‐cv (CON) 9 10 MARIA CASTILLO, JAMES COCHRAN, LUIS GOMEZ, BIENBENIDO GUERRA, RICHARD 11 MILLER, CARLO NIEVA, KENJI TAKABA
Cohen v. G & M Realty L.P.public domain
FREDERIC BLOCK, Senior United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ...427 II. ...428 A. The Relevant Statutory Framework...427 B. The Advisory Jury...430 C. The Witnesses and Evidentiary Landscape...431 III. ...432 A. The Advent and Evolution of 5Pointz...432 B. The
Norse v. City of Santa Cruzpublic domain
629 F.3d 966 (2010) Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; Loran Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Departm
Monica Melissa Patterson v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-18-00030-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MONICA MELISSA PATTERSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 370th District Court
Kathy Richey v. the Kroger Companypublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL F
MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway Hotelpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. In this action, Plaintiff Freddrick McMillan alleges that Defendant Millennium Broadway Hotel subjected him to a hostile work environment based on his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL
United States v. Elfgeehpublic domain
515 F.3d 100 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Aref ELFGEEH and Abad Elfgeeh, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 06-0638-cr(L), 06-0744-cr(con). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 26, 2007. Decided: February 14, 2008. *101 *102
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal from an insider securities trading conviction, we must decide difficult evidentiary issues involving an illegal interception of voicemail, as well as whether internal corporate earnings projections may constitute “material” inside information and whether conviction requires proof of actual use of that inside information.
Wilson v. Slatallapublic domain
970 F.Supp. 405 (1997) Allen WILSON v. Michelle SLATALLA, et al. Civil Action No. 95-8039. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 18, 1997. *406 *407 *408 *409 Marc I. Rickles, Kardos, Rickles, Sellers &am;
Hodge v. Hendersonpublic domain
761 F.Supp. 993 (1990) Allen HODGE, Petitioner, v. Robert HENDERSON, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 87 Civ. 3800 (KTD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 27, 1990. *994 *995 Lincoln Square Legal Services, Inc., New York City, Fordham University Sc
Nicholson v. Williamspublic domain
203 F.Supp.2d 153 (2002) Sharwline NICHOLSON, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nat WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants. Ekaete Udoh, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nicholas Scoppetta, et al.
deLeiris Ex Rel. deLeiris v. Scottpublic domain
642 F.Supp. 1552 (1986) Daniel deLEIRIS and Betsy deLeiris, individually and as parents and next friends of Sarah deLeiris, a minor; Ellen Weaver-Paquette and Joseph E. Paquette, Jr., individually and as parents and next friends of Jonathan Mason Paquette, a minor; Deborah A. Mycroft and Walter J. Mycroft III, individually and as parents and next friends of Kirstin Ann Mycroft, a minor; Becky Bessette and John Bessette, individually and as parents and ne
United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Bermanpublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Four defendaixts, Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Bex*man, appeal from judgments of conviction that followed a jury verdict in which they were found guilty of unlawfully participating in the distribution of unregistered shares of United Dye and Chemical Corporation stock. Appel