Cases

Opinion NORCOTT, J. The defendant, Geoffrey K. Ferguson, following a jury trial, was convicted of five counts of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a),1 two counts of capital felony in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54b (8),2 one count of arson in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-111 (a) (1),

653 F.3d 61 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Elizabeth A. Monrad, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, Defendants-Appellants.[*] Docket Nos. 08-6211-cr(L), 09-0121-cr(Con), 09-0313-cr(XAP), 09-0507-cr(Con), 09-0881-cr(XAP), 09-1072-cr(Con), 09-1120-cr(XAP), 09-1677-cr(Con), 09-1723-cr(XAP), 09-2127-cr(Con), 09-2141-cr(XAP). United Sta

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.................................................................69 I - All Defendants’ Claims.....................................................75 A - Stock Price Data......................................................75

584 F.Supp.2d 447 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 31, 2008. *448 Nora R. Dannehy, Acting United States Attorney, District of Connecticut

545 F.Supp.2d 238 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 29, 2008. *239 Alfred U. Pavlis, Daly & Pavlis, LLC, Southport, CT, Clifford H. Sc

553 F.Supp.2d 145 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 15, 2008. *148 Clifford H. Sehoenberg, Douglas I. Koff, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft

05/28/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HARLAN V. FERGUSON, ALIAS HARLEY T. MARTIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108894 Bobby R. McGee, Judge 1

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Warren W. Eginton, Senior United States District Judge In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff New England Reinsurance seeks a declaration regarding the rights and obligations of the parties to this action pursuant to certain liability insurance policies issued to P.E. O’Hair & Company and its successor United Westerburne Inc. After an extensive settl

RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTIONS TO SEVER CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge. The government and defendants Ferguson, Garand, Graham, Monrad, and Milton filed eighteen motions in limine in accordance with the Court’s pre-trial scheduling orders. These defendants have also joined in many of their co-defendants’ motions. The Court now addresses the defendants’ motion to exclude the govern

478 F.Supp.2d 220 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 24, 2007. *221 *222

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00043-CR ROBIN FERGUSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 49501-B Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIOHBAN FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1302 (TJK) DENIS MCDONOUGH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff sued Defendant, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in D.C. Superior Court for employment discrimination. She alleges that she faced disc

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1130 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUINTIN T. FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1130 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUINTIN T. FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

54 So.3d 152 (2010) STATE of Louisiana v. Barry FERGUSON. No. 2009-KA-1422. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 15, 2010. *153 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Andrew M. Pickett, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for State of Louisiana. Katherine M. Franks, Louisiana Appellate Proj

LAVINE, J. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the administrative appeal filed by the plaintiff, Carol Walenski, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to her failure to obtain a final decision from, or to otherwise exhaust her administrative remedies with, the named defendant, the Connecticut State Employees Retirement Commission (commissi

185 Conn. 104 (1981) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GEORGE FERGUSON Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued June 4, 1981. Decision released July 28, 1981. BOGDANSKI, C. J., SPEZIALE, PETERS, HEALEY and ARMENTANO, JS. *105 Michael D. Neubert, assistant public defender, with whom, on the brief, was Jerrold H. Barnett, pu

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

PER CURIAM. The appellant, Thomas Dale Ferguson, currently an inmate on death row at Holman Penitentiary, appeals the circuit court’s summary denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P. In June 1998, Ferguson was convicted of four counts of capital murder for murdering Harold Pugh and his 11-year-old son, Joey Pugh. The jury recommended, by a vote of 11 to 1,