Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Fentress v. Exxon Mobil Corporation”
Fentress v. Exxon Mobil Corp.public domain
HON. KEITH P. ELLISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") case alleging a breach of fiduciary duties in the management of a defined contribution plan. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 37) is pending. II. BACKGROUND The following facts are
Consolidated Waste Systems, LLC v. Metro Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 7, 2003 Session CONSOLIDATED WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC v. METRO GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C895 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge No. M2002-02582-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 30, 2005 A would-be developer of a construc
OPINION LATCHUM, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a patent infringement suit1 in which the plaintiff, E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), has charged the defendants, Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips Chemical Company, whose name was changed during the pend-ency of this case to Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., w
EI Du Pont De Nemours v. Phillips Pet. Co.public domain
656 F.Supp. 1343 (1987) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 81-508-JLL. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 26, 1987. *1344 *1345