⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-02-12 · Published · cited 65× · 778 F.3d 1320; 113 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1770; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2203
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Fenner Investments, Ltd. appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Célico Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, does not infringe claim 1 of United States Patent No. 5,561,-706 (the '706 patent). We affirm the judgment. Background The '706 patent is
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-09-14 · Published · cited 11× · 277 F. Supp. 3d 1077
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants’-motions to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before this court on June 14, 2017. Plaintiffs MH Pillars Ltd. (“MHP-UK”) and MH Pillars Inc. (“MHP-USA”) appeared by - their counsel P
District Court, E.D. California · 2013-08-15 · Published · cited 7× · 965 F. Supp. 2d 1141; 2013 WL 4407469; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115791
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Chief Judge. This case arises out of a decade-long business relationship in which Defendant Michael Hynes (“Hynes”) provided business consulting services to Plaintiffs Sacramento E.D.M., Inc. (“SAC EDM”) and SAC EDM’s President, Dan Folk (“Folk”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County
Muise v. GPU, INC.public domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 36× · 851 A.2d 799; 371 N.J. Super. 13
851 A.2d 799 (2004) 371 N.J. Super. 13 Madeline MUISE, individually and as owner and operator of Mediation and Therapy Associates, on behalf of herself and all other individuals and business entities similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GPU, INC., its subsidiaries, agents, servants and/or employees, and/or GPU Energy, its agents, servants, and/or employees, Defendant-Respondent. George J. Tzannetakis, and Paula
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
03/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 2, 2021 Session IN RE SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-1169-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor ___________________________________