Cases

ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 6, 2015, a grand jury returned an Indictment (the “Indictment”) against the Defendant Edward M. Walsh, Jr. (the “Defendant”), an employee of the Suffolk County Sheriffs Office (“SCSO”). The Indictment alleges that from January 2011 to April 2014, the Defendant made false representations to the SCSO as to the amount of overtime and regular hours that he

23 B.R. 798 (1982) In re Florence CHI-FENG HUANG, Debtor. In re Sheila HUANG, Debtor. Jerome E. ROBERTSON, Trustee, Appellant, v. Robert L. PIERCE, Appellee. BAP No. NC-81-1169-EGV, Bankruptcy Nos. 3-80-2323, 3-81-00255. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panels of the Ninth Circuit. Argued February 19, 1982. Decided September 9, 1982.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered August 17, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, arson in the second degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), petit l

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge *449Plaintiff Rod Wheeler brings this action asserting claims for defamation per se and, in the alternative, defamation and libel per quod , against Defendant Fox News Network LLC ("Fox News"), its parent company, Defendant Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. ("21st Century Fox" and, with Fox News, "Fox"), Fox

Lawrence E. Kahn, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On January 19, 2017, Tony Jennings commenced this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action *199against the City of Syracuse1 a

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 12, 2016 DEMARCUS KEYON COLE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-15-183 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2015-01901-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 11, 2016 The petitioner, Demarcus Keyon Cole, acting pro se, appeals the post-conviction court‟s denia

2024 WI 18 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP1334 COMPLETE TITLE: In the matter of the adoption of M. M. C.: A. M. B., Petitioner-Appellant, T. G., Appellant, v. Circuit Court for Ashland County, the Honorable

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1169 O. DOE; BRAZILIAN WORKER CENTER; LA COLABORATIVA, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; US DEPARTMENT OF STATE; MARCO RUBIO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in his official capacity as

2024 WI 18 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP1334 COMPLETE TITLE: In the matter of the adoption of M. M. C.: A. M. B., Petitioner-Appellant, T. G., Appellant, v. Circuit Court for Ashland County, the Honorable

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 593–706 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 1998, Appellant Michael Dale Rimmer was convicted and sentenced to death in Tennessee state court for the murder of Ricci Lynn Ellsworth. After his conviction, Rimmer learned that the federal government had conducted a joint investigation of Ellsworth’s murder with the Memphis Police Department and now alleges that this inve

DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT James Piper, Joseph Piper, Carol Piper and Donald Piper (collectively, “plaintiffs”) have initiated this action against the City of Elmira (the “City”), its police department and the following individual police officers: Scott Drake, III (“Drake”), Michael Marrone (“Marrone”),

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: These cases require us to resolve several legal issues related to the rights of disabled children under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. In these three cases, parents of autistic children (collectively and in their respective pairs, “the parents”) declined school placements of

DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff commenced this action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York State common law following her participation in a phase II clinical trial of Defendant’s investigational drug IPLEXtm (“IPLEX”). Defendant now moves to dismiss the action on various grounds. Plaintiff has opposed the mo

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ivamae Green (“Green”), Fitzroy Barnes, Fatima Barnes, and Eus-tace Barnes (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)1 *275bring this Action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York State law, alleging that Defendants Sergeant Glenn Scott (“Scott”), ‘ Sergeant Chris Gallagh

435 F.Supp.2d 838 (2006) Ronald ALSUP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. 3-DAY BLINDS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-244-GPM. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. June 8, 2006. *839 *840 Andrea B. Lamere, T. Evan Schaeffer, Schaeffer & Lamere, PC, Godfrey, IL, James G. Onder, Onder,

DECISION The matter before the Court involves a motion to dismiss brought by the Chief Judge of the Family Court, the Family Court Administrators, and the Magistrates of the Family Court (collectively "Court Defendants") alleging lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Super. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs brought

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROVNER, District Judge. This action is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that on May 13, 1985, he was discharged by defendant for failure to comply with a supervisor’s order that he remain at a meeting which was being held when plaintiff was not on duty and for which plaintiff was not to be paid. Plainti

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the scope of the statute of limitations found at § 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, a part of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Specifically, the court must decide whether an action for retaliatory discharge under § 215(a)(3),1 in which back wages are sought, is governed by § 255. The district court found that the statute o

938 F.2d 797 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 761, 119 Lab.Cas. P 35,522 Timothy J. CROWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PACE SUBURBAN BUS DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-3083. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 9, 1991.Decided Aug. 2, 1991.C.A.7 (Ill.) 1991.