Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Feltman v. Silver”
Silver v. Feltmanpublic domain
No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Silver & Co. v. Watermanpublic domain
Gaynor, J. (dissenting): ■ The answer, after several denials pleaded four defences of new matter, to each of which the plaintiff demurred on the ground of its insufficiency in law on the face thereof (Code Civ. Pro. § 494). The defendants’ attorney, as incredible as it may seem, concluded that the trouble was that he had not repeated the denials in the defences. He therefore moved for leave to amend the answer by repeating the
Hamburg v. Hamburgpublic domain
LAVINE, J. *334 In this protracted postmarital dissolution action, the defendant, Jeffrey R. Hamburg, appeals from the judgments of the trial court (1) ordering him to pay to the estate of the deceased plaintiff, Barbara B. Hamburg (decedent), funds he had misappropriated from his children's
Weiland v. Weilandpublic domain
814 So.2d 1252 (2002) Michael WEILAND, Appellant, v. Dorelle WEILAND, Robert Koop Johnson and Robert Koop Johnson, P.A., Appellees. No. 2D01-2490. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 3, 2002. Jon D. Parrish of Parrish, White & Lawhon, P.A., Naples, for Appellant. Robert Koop Johnson of Robert Koop Johnson, P.A., Naples, for Appellees
Florez v. Northshore University Healthsystempublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Florez v. Northshore University Healthsystempublic domain
2020 IL App (1st) 190465 FIRST DISTRICT SIXTH DIVISION August 21, 2020 No. 1-19-0465 JULIEN FLOREZ, a Minor, by His Parents and Next of Friends, ) Appeal from the Aimee Florez and David Florez,
405 B.R. 678 (2009) In the Matter of BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Debtor(s). Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation-Orlando, Plaintiff v. Gordon Blau, J. Gordon Blau, P.A., Gary Riley; Carla Silver and Stephan Silver. Bankruptcy No. 08-83029-JAC-11. Adversary No. 09-80012-JAC-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 8, 2009. <
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Stockspublic domain
Opinion ROTH, Judge: T1 Jay R. Stocks appeals the district court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment under rule 60(b)(1) of the Utah Rules of Civil: Procedure. Stocks's proposed defense below was that the four-year statute of limitations for actions on an "open account" barred any claim against him for the unpaid balance on his credit card account, See Utah Code Ann. § T8B-2-307(1)(c) (LexisNexi
Pdf Elec. & Supply Co. v. Jacobsenpublic domain
PDF Elec. & Supply Co. v. Jacobsen, 2020 NCBC 64. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 20 CVS 4609 PDF ELECTRIC & SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC and AGS ASSOCIATES, LLC d/b/a MRO ELECTRIC AND SUPPLY COMPANY INC., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingenpublic domain
998 So.2d 1158 (2008) BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP, Appellant, v. Linda Sue SWEARINGEN, et al., Appellee. No. 5D08-1089. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. November 21, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 13, 2009. *1159 John W. Foster, Sr. and Rebecca N. Shwayri of Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Orlando,
Banks v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hullpublic domain
ENOCHS, Judge. *430 The North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company ("Farm Bureau") appeals from the trial court's order dismissing its complaint pursuant to Lillian Dianne Hull's and Annitta B. Crook's ("Defendants") Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. After careful review, we affirm.
Bell v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
DiPENTIMA, C.J. *103 *782 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the absence of a jury instruction required by our Supreme Court's seminal decision in State v.
In re Scottpublic domain
ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE [D.E. 147] AND GRANTING CREDITOR’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENFORCE [D.E. 87] Raymond B. Ray, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court THESE MATTERS came before the Court for an evidentiary hearing on March 21, 2017 on Secured Creditor Crossfire Financial Network, Inc.’s Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Compelling Surrender [ECF NO. 84] And For Contempt A
Blau v. BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORPORATION-ORLANDOpublic domain
422 B.R. 293 (2009) J. Gordon BLAU, et al., Appellants, v. BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORPORATION-ORLANDO, et al., Appellees. Civil Action No. 09-AR-1324-NE. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. November 30, 2009. *295 Frank H. Tomlinson, Birmingham, AL, for Appellants. Derek F. Meek, Marc P. Solomo
RULING ON THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY LUANA SAYINGS BANK THAD J. COLLINS, Chief Judge. This matter came before the Court on Defendant Luana Savings Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court held a hearing on the matter. Dan Childers appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, Joseph E. Sarachek, Chapter 7 Trustee. Dale Putnam appeared on behalf of Defendant, Luana Savings Bank (the “Bank”). After hearing t
State v. Bankspublic domain
Opinion HENNESSY, J. The defendant, Mark Banks, appeals from the judgments of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), four counts of kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 and two counts of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statut
Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. Osierpublic domain
MR. JUSTICE SHEEHY delivered the opinion of the Court. The Hon. Russell E. Smith, a senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, has certified to us a question of law in which it appears there are substantial grounds for difference of opinion, the adjudication of which by this Court would materially advance a decision in federal litigation. The question is certified as follows:
In re the Estate of Hahnpublic domain
Edward S. Silver, J. This is an application for letters of administration. Although the matter is entitled “ Estate of helen hahn, Deceased,” who is referred to in the petition as “ decedent,” it is concerned with “ a person alleged to be deceased ” of whose estate full administration is sought (SCPA 1002; formerly Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 119, subd. 2) rather than temporary administration of the estate of an alleged deced
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. v. Citicorp North America, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)public domain
422 B.R. 783 (2009) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Citicorp North America, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-10928-JKO. Adversary No. 08-1435-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. October 30, 2009. *