Cases

Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 157 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4112 Matter of Benjamin FELIX-FIGUEROA, Respondent Decided July 30, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An Immigration Judge must apply the realistic probability test whenever a party asserts that a State’s statutory definitio

OPINION SHEPARD, Senior Judge. A few weeks after the effective date of Indiana’s new rule requiring that custodial interrogations be recorded as a condition of admissibility, appellant Curtis Tyrell Cutler broke into Tymesha Coleman’s home and stole her television, her computer, and the like. The question Cutler’s appeal presents

314 S.W.2d 861 (1958) The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee. No. 15386. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 20, 1958. Rehearing Denied July 11, 1958. *862 Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Miller & Martin, Hobert Price, Dallas, for appellant. Kenneth

Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge Wilkins. Wilkins, Circuit Judge: This is an Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") employment case. Plaintiff Brien Hill is a single-leg amputee who taught in defendant Associates for Renewal in Education's ("ARE's") afterschool program. The District Court granted partial summary judgment for ARE on two of Hill's claims, which he now appeals. Three other

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge1 : On May 23, 2013, Plaintiff Ernesto Rodriguez was arrested and charged with a narcotics offense that was alleged to have occurred two weeks earlier, on May 9, *4032013. After prosecutors dismissed the charges, Plaintiff brought claims against Sergeant Fredy Cruz and Officers A

PER CURIAM : We agree with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that the qualification of Humble Oil and Refining Company as a self-insurer under Article 6701h, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Statutes, did not provide D. 0. Cole with other “valid and collectible insurance” within the meaning of the policy of public liability insurance issued to' D. 0. Cole by The Home Indemnity Company, and that The Home Indemnity Company, an

Halpern, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in most of the majority’s report, but, like Judge Ruwe, whom I join, I dissent from the majority’s treatment of the overhead items — printing, telephone, computer, rent, and utilities (overhead). I. Introduction Petitioners’ S corporation, Automotiv

KING, Chief Judge: In this habeas case, the district court granted relief on six claims related to the penalty phase of Petitioner Antonio Bar-rientes’s capital murder trial and vacated Barrientes’s death sentence. The court denied all other claims and an application for a certificate of probable cause. Respondent Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK, et al., ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et ai., Plaintiffs, Case No. 18-cv-2248 (CRC) V. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Public Version of ECF 387) I. BACKGROUND ......cccsc0 _ vee 3 II. LEGAL STANDARDS . 7 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY ....sssccssssscsseeeecenees 7 B. DAMAGES 8 Ill. ANALYSIS 9 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY 9 1. ATTACKS 1, 3-9, 11-19, 21-28, 30-39, 41-52, 5465... .ccccccseccseeneeees

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, District Judge. This matter is before me on three motions. The first is Defendant Principal Life Insurance Company’s (“Principal”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Docs # 5 and 6]. The second is Plaintiff Denver Health and Hospital Authority’s (“DHHA”), Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2) [Doc

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-2574 SHARONELL FULTON; CECELIA PAUL; TONI LYNN SIMMS-BUSCH; CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellants v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS SUPPORT CENTER FO

PRESENT: All the Justices JESSICA SHOEMAKER, ADMINISTRATOR AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GINA ANGELA SHOEMAKER OPINION BY v. Record No. 191218 JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH March 25, 2021 RICHARD E. FUNKHOUSER, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHENANDOAH COUNTY Clifford Lynwood Athey, Jr.,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO THEIR RESPECTIVE PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORTS AND GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge. On September 15, 2011, the Government filed a sixteen count Indictment against Defendants Executive Recycling, Inc., Brandon Richter, and Tor Olson. (ECF No. 1.) After a lengthy and hard fought jury trial, on December 21, 201

The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D. Pursuant to a verified complaint filed September 18, 1996, plaintiffs, fifty-eight employees of the City of Newark and their collective bargaining representative, Newark Council No. 21, NJCSA, IFPTE, AFL-CIO, sought and were issued an order to show cause seeking to enjoin defendants, Mayor Sharpe James and the City of Newark (collectively “defendan

AMBRO, Circuit Judge A reporter from the Philadelphia Inquirer informed the City of Philadelphia's Department of Human Services in March 2018 that two of its agencies would not work with same-sex couples as foster parents. Human Services investigated this allegation, which it considered a violation of the City's anti-discrimination laws. When the agencies confirmed that, because of their relig

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution promises libertyto all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity. The petitioners in these cases seek to find that liberty by marrying someone of the same sex and having their marriages deemed lawful on the same te

Hudgins, J.,, delivered the opinion of the court. This is a controversy over a boundary line. The jury rejected the contentions of both parties and by its verdict established a new boundary. From the judgment entered on the verdict, defendants were awarded this writ of error. The boundary line in dispute is the line defined in the will of John Brim, probated November 23, 1887, dividing his

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. Appellee, Crude Oil Company, commenced this action against appellant, Carter Oil Company, to recover 1/6 of the royalty of oil produced from a well completed September 15, 1927. Recovery was sought of all the oil so produced from the date of the completion of the well to June 28, 1951, the date of the institution of this action, a period of approximately 24 years. The facts out of which t

456 B.R. 791 (2011) In re The ANTIOCH COMPANY, et al., Debtor. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust, W. Timothy Miller, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Lee Morgan et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 08-35741, 08-35742, 08-35743, 08-35744, 08-35745, 08-35746, 08-35747. Adversary No. 09-3409. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. April 28, 2011.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Dawson, C. J.: This appeal is to obtain a review of the trial court’s ruling on a pleading in an action to foreclose a real-estate mortgage on church property in Kansas City. It appears that on and prior to February 6, 1926, the church property involved was owned by the Quayle Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church, a corporation. On that date that ch