Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Felipe Dominguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Dominguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re

32 So.3d 706 (2010) Felipe DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D09-4278. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 6, 2010. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIR

183 Cal.App.4th 388 (2010) LUCIA LOPEZ DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. A125133. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. March 30, 2010. *391 Law Offices of Matthew R. Stall, Matthew R. Stall and Felipe R. Parker for Plaintiff and Appellant.</

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: Primarily at issue is whether, for Sentencing Guidelines purposes, criminally negligent homicide under Texas law is equivalent to manslaughter and, therefore, an enumerated crime of violence under Guidelines § 2L1.2, permitting the 16-lev-el enhancement imposed against Felipe de Jesus Dominguez-Ochoa. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n. l(B)(ii)(II) (2002). Criminally negligent homic

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Felipe Madera-Gallegos (Felipe) and Carla Rosa Gallegos were convicted of conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. They appeal their sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines. Carla Rosa contends that the district court erred in applying the 2-level obstruction of justice enhancement and in n

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00225-CV Donald GENTLES, Appellant v. Felipe GONZALEZ, Jr., Sean Clark, Haleigh Kidd, Marcos Perez, and Brenda Marin,

528 F.2d 382 Felipe Edmundo BLANCO-DOMINGUEZ, and Maria EvaRodriguez-Vialovos Blanco, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.Lazaro LOZADA-HERNANDEZ, Petitioners,DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF the UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION ANDNATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 74--2725, 74--3344. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

OPINION Before DUNIWAY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and PALMIERI,* District Judge. PER CURIAM: These two cases, consolidated for decision, present a common question of statutory interpretation under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254. In both, petitioners "are natives and citizens of Mexico who were illegally within

198 F.Supp.2d 116 (2002) CFSC CONSORTIUM, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Angel FERRERAS-GOITIA, et al., Defendants/Third-party Plaintiffs, v. The Farm Credit Bank of Baltimore, et al., Third-party Defendants. CIVIL NO. 00-1119 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 28, 2002. *117

626 N.E.2d 775 (1994) 255 Ill. App.3d 995 193 Ill.Dec. 465 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-92-0429. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. January 7, 1994. *778 G. Joseph Weller, Deputy Defender, Thomas

656 N.W.2d 112 (2003) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Felipe Edgardo TOVAR, Appellant. No. 01-1558. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 23, 2003. *113 Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Theresa R. Wilson, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Darrel L. Mullins, Assistant Attorn

958 F.Supp. 721 (1997) Eddie DOMINGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al., Defendants. Natividad Correa et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eli Lilly and Company et al., Defendants. Nos. 95-1043 HL, 95-2073 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 21, 1997. *722 *723

13 F.Supp.2d 613 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis ARANA, Jose Reyes, Gilberto Felipe Hernandez, and Lorenzo Dominguez, Defendants. No. 95-CR-80272. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 24, 1998. Michael Stern, Washington, DC, Wayne F. Pratt, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff U.S.A. Richard Paul Zipser, Bloomfield Hi

GENOVESE, Judge. 1 tThird Party Defendant/Appellant, CFS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Custom Frame Specialties (CFS), appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its motion for partial summary judgment and granting the cross-motion for partial summary judgment filed by Third Party Plaintiff/Appel-lee, Priola Construction Company (Priola). For the following reasons, we reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand the matter

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Felipe Vega appeals his convictions and sentences on charges of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and of utilization of a communications facility in committing such an offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). We affirm. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND <

BAUER, Chief Judge. Antonio Dominguez appeals from his conviction on twenty drug-related counts. He contends that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence a post-arrest oral statement and an immigration application, that if either of these arguments is successful, the evidence was insufficient to convict him, and that the government’s rebuttal summation was improper. We

18 F.Supp.2d 715 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis ARANA, Jose Alberto Reyes, Lorenzo Domingas, and Gilberto Felipe Hernandez, Defendants. No. 95-CR-80272. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 24, 1998. *716 Michael Stern, Wayne F. Pratt, Office of U.S. Atty, for U.S.A. Ric

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D

Case: 21-40565 Document: 00516904262 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 21, 2023

DECISION TORRUELLA, District Judge. Placed in the most favorable light to Plaintiff the issue presented by this case is not highly complicated. Assuming arguendo that Plaintiff was removed from his position as Assistant Secretary of Justice in charge of Administration at the Justice Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, without a hearing and for political reasons, is there a cause of