Cases

*296MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASTEL, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Carmen Feliciano seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) that denied her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Plaintiff asserts that the “Commiss

367 F.Supp.2d 196 (2005) Tomas AYALA-FELICIANO, Plaintiff(s) v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant(s). Civil No. 03-2101 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2005. Rafael Ramon-Flores, Ponce, PR, for Plaintiffs. Rebecca Vargas-Vera, Katherine Gonzalez-Valentin, United States Attorney's Office, Torre Chardon, San Juan, PR, for

115 F.Supp.2d 233 (2000) Carmen FELICIANO, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV. 98-1897 JP. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 30, 2000. *234 Jorge A. Gonzalez Lugo, Cordero, Gonzalez & Romn, Fabio A. Roman Garcia, Arecibo, PR, for Plaintiff. Lilliam E.

901 F.Supp. 50 (1995) Lavinia FELICIANO, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ. No. 94-1028(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 28, 1995. *51 Salvador Medina De La Cruz, Rio Piedras, PR, for Plaintiff. Marĩa Hortensia Ríos, Asst. U.S. Attorney,

931 F.Supp. 215 (1996) Juan FELICIANO, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 94 CV 5230 (BDP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 11, 1996. *216 *217 James M. Baker, Bronx Legal Services, New York City, for Plaintiff. Sapna Raj,

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Tammy Sue Wynn ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner," or "Defendant") denying her application for supplemental security income ("SSI"). (Dkt.

ALVORD, J. *387The self-represented plaintiff, Raymond Godaire, appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his appeal from the final decision of the defendant the Department of Social Services (department).1 The decision appealed from discontinued the plaintiff's benefits under the department's Medical Assistance t

Opinion NORCOTT, J. The principal issue in these appeals is whether the orthodontics regulation, § 17-134d-35 (e) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies,1 is *4a reasonable utilization control over the provision of orthodontic treatment to individuals receiving medicaid early prevention, screening, diagnosis

419 F.Supp.2d 302 (2005) Angel FELICIANO, Sabrina Lacy, Christopher Olujobi, Joseph Derrick, Dolores Brown, Juana Acevedo, Mario Cedeno and Leslie A. Scott (For Themselves and on behalf of all other Persons similarly situated), Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Richard Dormer, John Doe # 1 through 40 (being Suffolk County Police Officers who stopped or searched plaintiffs), John Doe # 41 through 50 (being unidentified ranking police officers who

Spina, J. The defendants, Ismael Feliciano and Hector Robles, were convicted of aggravated rape and indecent assault and battery on a person over the age of fourteen following a jury-waived trial in Superior Court. On appeal, the defendants argue that (1) we should reexamine certain records that a judge in the Superior Court, not the trial judge, ordered sealed pursuant to stage two of the Bishop-Fuller protocol, see

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Francisco Garcia brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 1383(c) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. On March 1, 2016, the Commissioner m

846 F.Supp. 1033 (1994) Ricardo FELICIANO and Renaldo Santiago, Plaintiffs, v. Larry E. DUBOIS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-11557-REK. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 10, 1994. *1034 *1035 *1036

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Murphree, who is white, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration (the “Agency”) in his employment-discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Murphree is long-term employee with the Agency who, at the time of the events giving rise to this case, was a District Man

697 F.Supp. 37 (1988) Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 79-4(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 28, 1988. *38 Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Rafael Pérez-Bachs, José Fernández-Seín, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P.R., Carlos García-Gutiérrez,

536 F.Supp.2d 403 (2008) Hermena GLADDEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 06 Civ. 3671 (AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 29, 2008. *404 Hermena L. Gladden, Yonkers, NY, pro se. John E. Gura, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, fo

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Nancy L. Drejka appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment to the Commissioner denying Drejka’s claim for disability benefits and supplemental security benefits (SSI). Because the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural background, we need discuss them only briefly.

672 F.Supp. 591 (1986) Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carlos ROMERO BARCELO, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 79-4 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 21, 1986. *592 Harvey B. Nachman, Santurce, P.R., for plaintiffs. Marcos Ramírez-Lavandero, Hato Rey, P.R., for defendants. PER

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises the issue of whether a non-assignable annuity contract that provides the spouse of an institutionalized person with monthly payments counts as an excess resource that must be spent down before the institutionalized person can receive Medicaid benefits under the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (“MCCA”). Before the United States D

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis de­nied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.

309 F.Supp. 1292 (1970) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edwin FELICIANO-GRAFALS, Defendant. Crim. No. 81-67. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 23, 1970. *1293 Roberto Jose Maldonado, San Juan, P. R., Michael Standard, New York City, Olaguibeet Lopez-Pacheco, San Juan, P. R., for defendant. Roy B