Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Felicia A. Parson”
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. ) Opinion issued June 4, 2024 GOVERNOR MICHAEL L. PARSON, ) ) Relator, ) ) v. ) No. SC100352 )
Blakely v. Superior Courtpublic domain
182 Cal.App.4th 1445 (2010) FELICIA BLAKELY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. No. G042107. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. March 19, 2010. *1449 Doreen Boxer, Public Defender, and Pamela P. King, Deputy Public Defender,
Order entered May 5, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00053-CV AGL CONSTRUCTORS, A JOINT VENTURE, ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS, LLC, GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, AND THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellants V. PTG-HDR JV, PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. AND HDR
Shane v. Albertson's Inc. Employees' Disability Planpublic domain
381 F.Supp.2d 1196 (2005) Stacey SHANE, Plaintiff, v. ALBERTSON'S INC. EMPLOYEES' DISABILITY PLAN, et al., Defendants. No. CV 04-1087 AHM(CWX). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 26, 2005. *1197 Glenn R. Kantor, Jennifer L. Kurzon, Tracy A. Collins, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA, for Plaintiff. Felic
MEMORANDUM OPINION LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge. On March 11, 2013, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On March 25, 2013, defendants Lori McCullough and Ashley Wilson filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, acc
FILED DALLAS COUNTY 05-19-00730-CV 6/1 9/2019 8:49
Reyes v. Macy's, Inc.public domain
Opinion POLLAK, J. Plaintiff and respondent Felicia Reyes has moved to dismiss the appeal of defendants Macy’s, Inc., Macy’s West Stores, Inc., and Jan Noll (collectively Macy’s). The appeal is from an order granting Macy’s motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s individual claims but denying the request to dismiss class allegations and plaintiff’s claim under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act o
Mulder v. Wilsonpublic domain
462 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2006) Felicia MULDER, Plaintiff, v. Lisa WILSON, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:06cv862-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. November 20, 2006. *1215 Robert Dean Drummond, Jr., Fairhope, AL, for Plaintiff. Jason Matthew Bledsoe, Office of the Attorney General, Montgomery, A
921 F.2d 604 64 Ed. Law Rep. 1020 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants-Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,andLaurel-Jones County Branch of the N.A.A.C.P., Manuel Jones,Jr., Felicia Wheeler, Kelly Anderson and TabithaAnderson, Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ASSOCIATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION, InterveningPl
United States v. Encevpublic domain
ORDER In 2007 Encio Encev pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a postal key in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1704. With that key Encev and his confederates pilfered checks from the mail, altered them, and then deposited them under other names. Given the magnitude of the scheme- — and the attendant loss — the district court settled on 92 months as an appropriate sentence. Encev filed a timely notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel h
York v. Harveypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Lawanda York, a former employee of the U.S. Army Reserve, initiated this case after learning that personal medical information pertaining to her was placed by her supervisor on a shared network drive that could be accessed by other employees. The plaintiff is suing the Office of the
United States v. Hollispublic domain
ORDER Darren Hollis pleaded guilty to misappropriating postal funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 1711, and was sentenced to twelve months and one day in prison. Hollis appeals, but his newly appointed counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous arguments to pursue and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hollis opposes counsel’s motion. See Cie. R. 51(b). We confine our review t
United States v. Hollispublic domain
ORDER Darren Hollis pleaded guilty to misappropriating postal funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 1711, and was sentenced to twelve months and one day in prison. Hollis appeals, but his newly appointed counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous arguments to pursue and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hollis opposes counsel’s motion. See Cie. R. 51(b). We confine our review t
United States v. Encevpublic domain
ORDER In 2007 Encio Encev pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a postal key in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1704. With that key Encev and his confederates pilfered checks from the mail, altered them, and then deposited them under other names. Given the magnitude of the scheme- — and the attendant loss — the district court settled on 92 months as an appropriate sentence. Encev filed a timely notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel h
Hall v. Colvinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. McCONNELL, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court for review of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ’s”) decision denying an application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) submitted by Kathryn L. Hall. Ms. Hall filed her SSI application on March 9, 2009, claiming a disability onset date of January 17, 1976. Trans. 20.1 Ms. Hall al
United States v. Cunninghampublic domain
ORDER Following a jury trial, Thomas Cunningham was found guilty of one count of bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment, 30 months below his guidelines range of 210 to 240 months. Cunningham appeals, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We revi
SMITH, TERRY v. SZPILEWSKI, EUGENEpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 239 CA 15-01289 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. TERRY SMITH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EUGENE SZPILEWSKI AND FELICIA SZPILEWSKI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. RODGERS LAW FIRM, BUFFALO (MARK C. RODGERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. COLLINS & COLLINS ATTORNEYS, LLC, BUFFALO (MICHAEL LANC
Faison v. Sex Crimes Unit of Philadelphiapublic domain
845 F.Supp. 1079 (1994) Marie M. FAISON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEX CRIMES UNIT OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-6601. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 24, 1994. *1080 Edward C. German, D. Selaine Belver, German, Gallagher & Murtagh, Philadelphia, PA, for Faison. Marie M. Fai
In Re Bilskipublic domain
545 F.3d 943 (2008) In re Bernard L. BILSKI and Rand A. Warsaw. No. 2007-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 30, 2008. *946 David C. Hanson, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Richard L. Byrne and Nathan J. Prepelka. Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicito
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-291-CV KARAN R. MOSELEY, M.D. AND APPELLANTS OMEGA OB-GYN ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH ARLINGTON V. OMEGA OB-GYN ASSOCIATES OF APPELLEES SOUTH ARLINGTON AND KARAN R. MOSELEY, M.D.