Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION, et al., Civil Action No. 20-2074 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Defendant.

Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: We granted, in a prior order, rehearing en bane in this appeal. In a separate order, filed concurrently with this opinion, -we scheduled en banc oral argument for the week o

242 B.R. 88 (1999) In re Irving FELDMAN, Debtor. William A. Looney, Plaintiff, v. Irving Feldman, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-30721-BKC-SHF. Adversary No. 98-3156. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, West Palm Beach Division. November 18, 1999. *89 Thomas D DeCarlo, West Palm Beach, FL, for plaintiff.

Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: In April 2016, Leslie Feldman and other appellants1 brought an action in district court challenging Arizona House Bill 2023 *1061(H.B. 2023), which precludes individuals who do not fall into one of several exceptions (e.g., election off

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS STEPHANIE M. ROSE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a case brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. *656In all cases such as this, the threshold question is the same: whether the alleged fiduciary was acting

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge. Lemire Schmeglar, (“Schmeglar”) owns a home located at 2715 N. Paulina in Chicago, IL. On October 24th, after a judg*121ment of foreclosure, but before a foreclosure sale took place, Debtor filed for relief under Chapter 11. A plan of reorganization (“

513 F.Supp.2d 1076 (2007) Douglas MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. PIPESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC, and Messerli & Kramer, P.A., Defendants. Civil No. 04-4142 (JNE/SRN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 30, 2007. *1077 Wood R. Foster, Jr., Esq., and Mark Thieroff, Esq., Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A.,

Chapter 7 RE: Adv. Docket Nos.: 79 and 81 OPINION 1 Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION This matter requires the Court to determine whether a substantial tax refund is property of the estate due to a tax sharing agreement between the debtor, Downey Financing Corp. (“DFC” or the “Debtor”), and its non-debtor sub

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiffs The 2002 Lawrence R. Buchal-ter Alaska Trust (“the Trust”), Alaska Trust Company, and Stephen C. Harris (“Harris”) assert seven causes of action against Defendant Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Company (“PFLAC”), formerly known as AGL Life Assurance Company, from which the Trust purchased a variable universal life insurance

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-260V Filed: December 20, 2018 To be Published ************************************* S.E.H., * * Petitioner, *

606 F.Supp. 916 (1985) Jerome I. FELDMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PIONEER PETROLEUM, INC., Frontier Corporation, The Estate of William D. Bradford, John H. Burgher, Fidelity Bank, N.A., The Estate of Grady D. Harris, Arthur Young & Company and James L. Houghton, Defendants. No. CIV 77-0012-R. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. February 28, 1985.

OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. We are called upon once again to address litigation arising out of a tax avoidance scheme devised in the late 1980s. 1 Defendant James Barrett, a financial planner, induced the plaintiffs, four small New Jersey corporations and their respective owners, to adopt an e

Becker, J. ¶1 This consolidated case originated in a foreclosure rescue scheme. The trial court quieted title in the homeowners. One appellant, ordered to pay damages and attorney fees, contends a new trial should be granted because the homeowners did not disclose a settlement they reached pretrial with another defendant. Because no prejudice was shown, we reject this argument. The other appellant contends it holds a superior int

OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellants Stephen, Leann, David, and Christine Ouwinga and their company, Stoney Creek Fisheries and Equipment, Inc., (the “Ouwingas”) appeal the dismissal of their Complaint against various Defendant-Appellees related to a purported tax-deductible welfare benefit plan — the Benistar 419 Plan (“Benistar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-2453 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, th

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I.Factual and Procedural Background........................................279 A. The Alleged Predatory Lending Scheme..................................279 B. The Separate Class Actions and the Initial Settlement......................280 C. The Objectors............

605 F.Supp.2d 914 (2009) Jerry A. WHITTIKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08 CV 300. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 17, 2009. *917 Colin P. Sammon, Thomas D. Robenalt, William J. Novak, Novak, Robenalt, Pavlik & Scharf, James B. R

498 U.S. 73 (1990) ARCADIA, OHIO, ET AL. v. OHIO POWER CO. ET AL. No. 89-1283. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued October 1, 1990. Decided November 27, 1990. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. *74 Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioner