Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Federal Trade Commission v. LeanSpa, LLC”
Federal Trade Commission v. Leanspa, LLCpublic domain
RULING RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY RELIEF DEFENDANT ANGELINA STRANO (DOC. NO. 109), THE LEADCLICK DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 155), AND RICHARD CHIANG (DOC. NO. 179) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the State of Connect*272icut (the “State”) (collectively, “plai
Federal Trade Commission v. LeadClick Media, LLCpublic domain
CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, plaintiffs-appellees the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the State of Connecticut (the “State”) seek to hold defendant-appellant LeadClick Media, LLC (“LeadClick”) liable for its role in the use of deceptive websites to market weight loss products. LeadClick managed a network of affiliates—known as “publishers”—to advertise on the internet products of its merchant client, LeanSpa, LL
Federal Trade Commission v. Tax Club, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: In this civil enforcement action, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the State of Florida, and the State of New York (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) sue a group of corporate entities (the “Corporate Defendants”) that this Opinion will refer to as the “Tax Club Enterprise” or the “Enterprise,” and four people associated with the Enterprise (the
FTC v. LeadClick Media, LLCpublic domain
15‐1009‐cv FTC v. LeadClick Media, LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015 (Argued: June 3, 2016 Decided: September 23, 2016) Docket Nos. 15‐1009‐cv, 15‐101
Vazquez v. Buhlpublic domain
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o