Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1080 (JDB) SURESCRIPTS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. This case arises from loyalty pricing contracts offered beginning in 2010 by defendant S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1080 (JDB) SURESCRIPTS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. This case arises from loyalty pricing contracts offered beginning in 2010 by defendant S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In preparation for the high-stakes, national antitrust trial in this case set to begin in a matter of weeks, Plaintiff the Federal Trade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v Civil Action No. 19-1080 (JDB) SURESCRIPTS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Trade Commission petitions this Court for equitable reliei including a permanent injunction and moneta

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case involves allegedly anticompetitive conduct in the ductile iron pipe fittings (“DIPF”) market by McWane, Inc., a family-run company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. In 2009, following the passage of federal legislation that provided a large infusion of money for waterworks projects that required domestic pipe fittings, Star Pipe Produ

CLARK, Associate Justice: The Kroger Company brings this petition for review in which it complains of a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission holding Kroger in violation of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 13(f) 1 for having knowingly induc

502 F.Supp.2d 1 (2007) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., and Wild Oats Markets, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1021(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 16, 2007. *2 *3 Michael Bloom, Amanda L. Wait, Catharine Mary Moscatelli,

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, concurring: I willingly concur in Judge Starr’s excellent opinion and write separately to indicate the extraordinary difficulties facing the Commission if it should attempt to pursue this case on remand. On my reading of the law (which is somewhat less generous to the Commission than that of the majority), the practices complained of cannot be found to be illegal price discrimina-

701 F.Supp.2d 938 (2010) The KROGER CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SANOFI-AVENTIS, et al., Defendants. In re Plavix Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to All Actions. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sanofi-Aventis, et al., Defendants. Nos. 1:06-CV-163, 1:06-CV-202, 1:06-CV-427. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

65 F.Supp.2d 516 (1999) Elaine MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO. and Charles Hembree, Defendants. No. Civ.A. H-98-2120. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. September 15, 1999. *517 *518 *519 *520

442 B.R. 196 (2010) In re OLD CARCO LLC (f/k/a Chrysler LLC), et al., Debtors. Old Carco LLC (f/k/a Chrysler LLC); Old Carco Motors LLC; Chrysler Group LLC; and Old Carco Liquidation Trust, Plaintiffs, v. John Kroger, Oregon Attorney General; Matthew Garrett, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation; Matthew Dunlap, Maine Secretary of State; John McCurry, Chairman of the Maine Motor Vehicles Franchise Board; Jesse White, Illinois Secre

ROBERT P. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or the Commission) in the matter of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.,-F.T.C. -[1973-76 Transfer Binder] CCH Trade Reg.Rep. ¶ 21,150 (1976) (hereinafter cited as A & P). The Commission found that A & P viol

377 F.Supp. 773 (1974) WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendants. No. 73-863-Civ-J-S. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. May 17, 1974. *774 J. Shepard Bryan, Jr., Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Jacksonville, Fla., and James F. Rill, John Hardin Young, Washington, D. C.,

270 Kan. 148 (2000) 12 P.3d 889 In the Matter of The Appeal of The Kroger Co., from an Order of the Division of Taxation on Assessment of Corporate Income Tax. No. 83,927. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed November 3, 2000. John H. Wachter, of Wright, Henson, Somers, Sebelius, Clark & Baker, L.L.P., of Topeka, argued the cause and

Mr. Justice Marshall, dissenting in part. I agree with the Court that the Federal Trade Commission and the Court of Appeals applied the wrong legal standard in *86assessing A&P’s liability under the Robinson-Patman Act. However, I cannot join the Court’s interpretation of § 2 (f) as precluding buyer liability under this Act unless the seller could al

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Petitioner United Biscuit Company of America seeks review of a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission and a subsequent order of the Commission denying a stay of the cease and desist order. The Commission found petitioner guilty of violating section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Ro

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court. The Borden Company, respondent here, produces and sells evaporated milk under the Borden name, a nationally advertised brand. At the same time Borden packs and markets evaporated milk under various private brands owned by its customers. This milk is physically and chemically identical with the milk it distributes under its own brand but is sold at both the

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. Petitioner seeks to set aside a cease and desist order entered against it by the Federal Trade Commission in the proceeding entitled In the Matter of Shreveport Macaroni Manufacturing Company, Inc., Docket No. 7719, before the Federal Trade Commission. Our jurisdiction is based on 15 U.S.C.A. § 21(c)

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. The Federal Trade Commission held that the acquisition of Fram Corporation by the Bendix Corporation violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18. 1 Reversing the decision of its Hearing Examiner, the Commission directed divestiture of Fram.