Cases

OPINION SMITH, Judge. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent because appellants’ claims lie outside the scope of the summary nature of an eviction action. We also affirm the district court’s denial of an unconditional stay of the eviction because appellants do not contend that théy did not default on their mortgage or that

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 12-1-3125 KTN) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Remanded.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WYNN joined. Judge JOHNSTON wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In connection with a $66,500 loan secured by a deed of trust on her house, Renee McCray commenced this action for damages against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corpora

WALTERS, J., pro tern. I. Nature of the Case Margaret Butcher and her former husband purchased residential property in 2005 with a loan secured by the property from Home Federal Bank. Butcher received the property in their divorce in 2009, and she subsequently defaulted on the loan. Wells Fargo Bank, the indorsee of the loan, foreclosed on the property. At the foreclosure sale, Federal Home Loan Mortgage.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on motion by the Defendants, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [DN 27] and on a motion by Defendants, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, in its capacity as Conserva

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. The allegations in' this case hearken back to the days of the recent financial crisis and the near-cóllapse of the mortgage-bácked securities market. The issues we deal with today, though, are of the technical, legalistic vkriety: we have to figure out' whether the district court erred hi finding that it lacks statutory power to transfer this action to.

*305 MEMORANDUM DECISION Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sheila Marie Spencer (“Spencer”), the Debtor and Plaintiff in this adversary proceeding, filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy on April 3, 2015. PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”), one of the Defendants, filed a Motion for Relief From Stay With In Rem Relief on April 16, 2015. Spencer filed a C

137 P.3d 429 (2006) 143 Idaho 42 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary R. APPEL and Linda L. Appel, husband and wife, and all other residents designated as John Does I-X, Defendants-Appellants. No. 31760. Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, April 2006 Term. May 25, 2006. *430

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JUN-2024 08:25 AM Dkt. 42 OAWST NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

UNITED S'I`ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DlSTRlCT OF COLUMBIA ) JOSHUA J. ANGEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:18-cv-01142 ) FEDERAL HOME LOAN ) MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANBUM OPINION losian .l. Angel_, a holder of preferred stock in both the Federal National l\/Iortgage Association (“P`annie l\»ilae") and the Federal Honte Loan i\/fortgage Coiporation (“Freddie Mac"` and together with Fannie Mae the "Companies")` brings the present action as a pro n

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE FOR PUBLICATION CORPORATION, January 21, 2021 9:1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 19-0712 444444444444 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. SYLVIA ZEPEDA, RESPONDENT 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

Barnes, Presiding Judge. Proceeding pro se, Mike Samadi appeals the trial court's order granting the motion to open default filed by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and *71 the trial court's final order and judgment granting Freddie Mac's motion to dismiss based o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-1758-CRC v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Since 2007, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporat

NUMBER 13-24-00174-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JEFF SPENCE AND CARRIE SPENCE, Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW

854 F.Supp. 113 (1994) FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Ieremias TSINOS, Cibro Petroleum Brooklyn, Inc., and John Doe # 1 to # 70, Both Inclusive, the Names of the Last 70 Defendants Being Fictitious, Said Defendants' True Names Being Thereby Intended to Designate Parties with Liens that are Subject and Subordinate to the Lien of the Mortgage Being Foreclosed Herein and Tenants, Lessees, or Occupants of Portions of the Mortga

969 P.2d 1275 (1998) 89 Hawai`i 157 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; and Source One Mortgage Services Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE CO.; Tig Insurance Co., Associates Financial Services Co. of Hawaii, Inc.; Lydia R. Swenson; Deanna Eihua Kupihea; Defendants-Appellees, and John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendants.</

Dalianis, C.J. The defendant, Michelle Willette (Willette), appeals a decision of the 6th Circuit Court-Hooksett District Division (Spath, J.), issuing a writ of possession in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). On appeal, Willette argues that the district division erred in i

The single justice did not err or abuse her discretion in denying relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. Judgment affirmed.

FORST, J. Appellant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company appeals the trial court’s entry of an order granting a loan modification to Appellee/Cross-Appellant James Beekman (“Borrower”). 1 Appellant asserts the issue of loan modification was neither requested in Borrower’s pleadings nor tried by consent. Because we agree wit