Cases

MEMORANDUM LEGROME D, DAVIS, District Judge. Plaintiffs1 — six institutional Funds that invested in debt securities issued by Diagnostic Ventures, Inc. (DVI, Inc.)2 — sue for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. They also seek imposition of liability

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT B.K., by her next friend Margaret No. 17-17501 Tinsley; B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski; A.C.-B., by D.C. No. their next friend Susan Brandt; M.C.- 2:15-cv-00185- B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; ROS D.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; J.M., by their next friend Susan Brandt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J

614 F.3d 1288 (2010) Jeremiah THOMAS, Michael McKinney, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Randall BRYANT, in his official capacity, Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellants. No. 09-11658. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 20, 2010. *1293 Craig D. Feiser, Volpe Bajalia Wickes, Jac

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States District Judge This is a putative class action brought against two affiliated trucking companies by drivers once associated with those companies. Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay allege that Defendants C.R. England, Inc. and Opportunity Leasing, Inc. developed a fraudulent plan to induce thousands of people to enroll in England’s dr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand, filed May 28, 2014 (Doc. 12)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on August 7, 2014. The primary issue is whether the Court should grant the Motion and remand this case to state court, because it was pending there for “more than 1 year” at the time of removal

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [Dkt. No. 277] DEAN D. PREGERSON, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, (Dkt. No. 277), which is opposed by the Defendants on multiple grounds. Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral arguments, the Court adopts the following order. I. BACKGROUN

RULING AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL [Doc. ## 20, 26]† JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Safeco Insurance Company of America (“Safeco”) has moved to compel Defendant Pamela Veesey (“Mrs.Veesey”) to respond to interrogatories and a request for production related to marriage counseling and psychological treatment she has received in relation to injuries she sustained in

ORDER Kimberly Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Lennar Mare Island, LLC (LMI), CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. (CCI), and Steadfast Insurance Company dispute their obligations with respect to the cleanup of Mare Island, a former U.S. Navy shipyard. This order addresses LMI’s motions for partial summary judgment of the definitions of “Government Authority” and “Known Pollution Conditions.” ECF Nos. 160, 18

ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. Lennar Mare Island, LLC (LMI), CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. (CCI), and Steadfast Insurance Company dispute their obligations in the clean-up of Mare Island, a former U.S. Navy base. Several motions'are pending: LMI’s motions for partial summary judgment as to the definition of “Government Authority” and “Known Pollution Condition”; Steadfast’s motio

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 03-0632V Originally filed September 28, 2015 Refiled in redacted form May 23, 2016 For Publication *******************************************************

248 F.3d 151 (3rd Cir. 2001) DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, Appellant in No. 99-6054v.ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. O'CONNOR; SCHUMANN HESSION KENNELLY & DORMENT; SCHUMANN HANLON & PANEPINTO; HAROLD FRIEDMAN; KIRSTEN, SIMON, FRIEDMAN, ALLEN, CHERIN & LUTKIN; GREENBERG MARGOLIS; FRANZBLAU DRATCH & FRIEDMAN; STRYKER TAMS & DILL; SCHUMANN HANLON O'CONNOR & MCCROSSIN; HAROLD FRIEDMAN; STRYKER TAMS & DILL, Third-Party Plaintiffs

ORDER ALAIMO, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................249 DISCUSSION..................................................................251 I. Theories of Liability in the Case ..............................................251 A. Failure to Disclose

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege that defendan

ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I

DAVIS, Justice: The petitioner herein, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”), requests this Court to issue a writ of prohibition to prevent the Circuit Court of Harrison County from enforcing its October 25, 2010, Protective Order. By the terms of that order, the circuit court restricted the manner in which State Farm would be permitted to use the medical records of the respon

150 F.3d 1011 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8001 Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andKenneth Edwards; Nancy Edwards; Kathy Hancock; MichaelHancock; Lori Tuttle; Paul Alan Levy; NancyHuvendick; Center For Auto Safety,Intervenors-Appellants,v.CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.Stuart HANLON, Plaintiff,andRobert Kempton, Plaintiff-Appellant,andGeorge Va

66 F.Supp.2d 1370 (1999) James HUDDLESTON as the Representative of Elizabeth Irene Huddleston, deceased, and as the Executor of the Will and Estate of Elizabeth Irene Huddleston, Plaintiff, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIVA1:98-CV-1865-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 16, 1999.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY CLASSES MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On December 21, 2006, plaintiffs Nicola Edwards and James Schley filed an action in this court against defendant Toys “R” Us (“Toys”), alleging that it had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.1 Specifically, plaintiffs asserted that Toys had violated t

851 F.Supp. 141 (1994) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION RECEIVER OF ACTION FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. WILSON; Teddy Menas, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. ACTION SAVINGS BANK SLA; Joseph M. Skowronski; Charles T. Gemmel, Esq.; Todd, Gemmel, Nugent & Fitzgerald, P.A.; Lawrence E. Mills, Managing Agent; Resolution Trust Corporation; Emanuel Solomon; George Elkins; Steve E. Brady; Joseph D'Orio; and Robert Tur

BYE, Circuit Judge. Barbara Barham filed this action in district court challenging Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company’s (Reliance’s) denial of her claim for long-term disability benefits under a plan governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Applying an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court concluded the denial was supported by substantial evidence. Bec