Cases

Matter of OTR Media Group Inc. v New York City Dept. of Bldgs. (2024 NY Slip Op 24100) [*1] Matter of OTR Media Group Inc. v New York City Dept. of Bldgs. 2024 NY Slip Op 24100 Decided on March 27, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Levine, J

Matter of Margolis v York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2019 NY Slip Op 01765) Matter of Margolis v York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles 2019 NY Slip Op 01765 Decided on March 13, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department

Matter of Plekhanov v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. (2022 NY Slip Op 01750) Matter of Plekhanov v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. 2022 NY Slip Op 01750 Decided on March 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department </

Matter of Fichera v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation (2018 NY Slip Op 01843) Matter of Fichera v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation 2018 NY Slip Op 01843 Decided on March 16, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department

ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Objections (ECF DKT #45) of Plaintiff, Jerome F. Shoemake, to Magistrate Judge Greg White’s Report and Recommendation (ECF DKT # 44). For the following reasons, the Report and Recommendation is affirmed in all respects and the Objections are overruled. I. BACKGROUND

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 766 {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Paula Carter and Susie Toney jointly appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing their complaint against defendant-appellee Trotwood-Madison City Board of Education. Carter and Toney contend that the trial court erred in sustaining the board's motion to dism

601 N.W.2d 696 (1999) Jane DOE and Joan Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 200810. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Released June 25, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. Vacated July 9, 1999. Released for Publication October 8, 1999.

377 F.3d 1275 Steven LOFTON, Douglas Houghton, Timothy Acaro, next friend of John Doe and John Roe, Wayne Smith, Daniel Skahen, John Doe, John Roe, minor children, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Angela Gilmore, et al., Plaintiffs,v.SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, (formerly H.R.S.), District Administrator, District XI of Florida Department of Children and Family Services, Defendants-Appellees,Charlie Crist, Attorn

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice. This appeal is from a judgment of the circuit court which dismissed the Board of Education’s complaint seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the sheriff from refunding to a class of taxpayers a portion of their 1981 school taxes from current school taxes in his possession. The Department of Revenue also appeals from a rule ordering these refunds. The principal issue involves the

Matter of Town of Brookhaven v Ball (2025 NY Slip Op 01686) Matter of Town of Brookhaven v Ball 2025 NY Slip Op 01686 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Egan Jr., J.P. Published

Matter of Riel v State of N.Y. Off. of Children & Family Servs. (2019 NY Slip Op 06575) Matter of Riel v State of N.Y. Off. of Children & Family Servs. 2019 NY Slip Op 06575 Decided on September 17, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department

Matter of Jacobs v Tuckahoe Hous. Auth. (2020 NY Slip Op 04392) Matter of Jacobs v Tuckahoe Hous. Auth. 2020 NY Slip Op 04392 Decided on August 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State L

96 So.2d 854 (1957) Allene Hopwood DUREE, Individually and as Tutrix, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE of Louisiana through Department of Institutions, Defendant-Appellant, et al. No. 4464. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 28, 1957. Rehearing Denied September 23, 1957. Writ of Certiorari Granted November 12, 1957.

OPINION OF THE COURT Arlene P. Bluth, J. The petition from petitioner, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO (UFT), seeking to vacate and annul a determination of respondent New York City Board of Collective Bargaining (BCB) is denied, and this proceeding is dismissed. This proceeding arises out of a BCB decision that found that UFT had breached the duty of fair representa

Matter of AAG Mgt., Inc. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp. (2024 NY Slip Op 06148) Matter of AAG Mgt., Inc. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 06148 Decided on December 10, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination by Joseph J. Martens, Commissioner of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, dated May 21, 2012, confirming the determination of an administrative law judge, made after an issues conference pursuant to 6 NYCRR 624.4 (b), denying the petitioners’ request for full party status pursuant to 6 NYCRR 624.5 (b) and cancelling an adjudi

Matter of Ansley v Jamesville-DeWitt Cent. Sch. Dist. (2019 NY Slip Op 05439) Matter of Ansley v Jamesville-DeWitt Cent. Sch. Dist. 2019 NY Slip Op 05439 Decided on July 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Pub

Matter of TWU Counseling Ctr. Inc. v New York City Tax Commn. (2022 NY Slip Op 02379) Matter of TWU Counseling Ctr. Inc. v New York City Tax Commn. 2022 NY Slip Op 02379 Decided on April 12, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Publi

MEMORANDUM: In Matter of Bolt v. New York City Dept. of Education and Matter of Beatty v. City of New York, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, respondents' cross motion to dismiss the petition granted, and the certified question answered in the negative; in Matter of Williams v. City of New York, the arbitral award appealed from and the Appellate Division order brought up for revie

*964 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING CANTRELL PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO INTERVENING DEFENDANT ERIC RUSSELL, DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE BY JENNIFER GRATZ, AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ RESPECTIVE MOTIONS TO CERTIFY THE MATTERS AS CLASS ACTIONS, INTERVENING DEFENDANT ERIC RUSSELL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, CANTRELL PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, AND INTERVENING DE