Cases

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

457 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2006) WASHINGTON TOXICS COALITION; Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides; National Wildlife Federation; Defenders of Wildlife; Natural Resources Defense Council; Center for Biological Diversity; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations; Institute for Fisheries Resources; and Helping our Peninsula's Environment, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR; FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; United State

The trial court clearly and concisely stated the facts and the reason for the decree entered dismissing the bill of complaint. His language is adopted, as follows: "This is a bill to restrain defendants from selling, assigning, transferring, incumbering, a certain strip of land along the north side of Michigan avenue, or from removing or damaging trees, shrubs, etc., located on said land, and also praying that the court may decree that F.W. Brooks, trustee, and his successors and assig

Adams, J. (concurring in issuance of writ). Whether one agrees with the construction of the so-called grandfather provision of CL 1948, § 338.481 (Stat Ann 1956 Rev § 14.771) contended for by Justice Dethmers or by Justice O’Hara, the statute, in my opinion, is unconstitutional. I. I agree with Justice Dethmers that the sale of drugs and poisons can very directly affect public hea

374 Mich. 70 (1964) 130 N.W.2d 892 ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., v. ATTORNEY GENERAL. ALLEN v. SAME. Calendar Nos. 30, 31, Docket Nos. 50,332, 50,340. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided November 2, 1964. *71 Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (Jason L. Honigman, Alan E. Schwartz, John

On August 30, 1935, appellant secured a permit from the commissioner of police of the city of Detroit to exhibit a talking motion picture entitled "The Youth of Maxim." Prior to the public showing of the picture, this permit was revoked. Both sides produced leading citizens who testified in the circuit court upon the hearing for a writ of mandamus. One of these indicated that the film depicted the revolution in Russia in 1907. He said: "It is not communistic except that it refer

The wave of crime which is sweeping over this country is causing much alarm to law-abiding people. No banker, business man or householder seems immune from attack by the burglar, nor is any man, woman or child, when upon the streets, free from the danger of being kidnapped or robbed. The instrumentality which permits such freedom of action on the part of the lawbreaker may well be said to be the indiscriminate use of firearms. While the law prohibits their use except as provided for therein (