Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Although I acknowledge that this is a close case, I cannot agree with my colleagues that Barbara Fawcett's complaint should be dismissed as a matter of law for failure to state a claim. Fawcett insists that, at a minimum, she is entitled to seek *141information about the rationales and factual basis for Citize

Citizens' Motion to Compel Arbitration Citizens, invoking the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 2 et seq. ("FAA"), asserts that because the parties have an agreement to arbitrate, this Court must compel arbitration and stay or dismiss Fawcett's claims pending arbitration. Fawcett argues that she was never p

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge TROXLER joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: After Colin McRoberts and Jean Faw-cett divorced, Mr. McRoberts moved from Scotland to Virginia with the couple’s son, Travis. Ms. Fawcett filed a petitio

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. Before us are consolidated appeals from a preliminary injunction restraining defendant-appellant Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) from excluding “supervisory goodwill” in calculating the capitalization of plaintiff-appellee Carteret Savings Bank, FA for regulatory purposes under the new standards established by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enf

325 S.E.2d 86 (1985) Natalie CARR, et al. v. CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY. Record No. 820355. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 18, 1985. Charles H. Cuthbert, Jr., Petersburg, for appellants. Kennon C. Walden, Jr., Blackstone (Walden & Walden, P.C., Blackstone, on brief), for appellee. Present: All the Justices. COCHRAN, Justice.

OPINION GEORGE C. YOUNG, Senior District Judge. This controversy arises from a dispute of the meaning of certain provisions contained in the lease agreement of May 20, 1965, entered into between the plaintiff, the then Citizens National Bank, now the Pan American Bank of Orlando, and the firm of Collins Tuttle,1 which was a real estate development firm. The issues in contro

SUBSTITUTE OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice Appellants, Richard Fawcett, Kevin Roberts, Darren Pitts, George Lilliard, Christopher Matthews, Armando Florido, David Vukovic, Ken Patrick, James Lemons, Douglas Hissong, and Danny Fuller, Sr., bring an interlocutory appeal 1 of the trial court’s order

939 F.Supp. 674 (1996) COMMERCIAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL FEDERAL BANK, and Hawkeye Federal Savings Bank, Defendants. No. C 96-3077-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. September 23, 1996. *675 Michael G. Voorhees and Jeffrey D. Harty of Zarley, McKee, Thomte, Voorhees & Sease, in Sio

352 F.Supp.2d 1077 (2004) COMERICA BANK, as agent for itself and for Lasalle Business Credit, Inc., Hsbc Business Credit (USA), Inc., and Gmac Commercial Credit, LLC Plaintiffs, v. WHITEHALL SPECIALTIES, INC., Steve Fawcett, Cees Wit, John Lynch, individuals, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive Defendant. No. EDCV 04-744 RT(SGLX). United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division.

963 F.2d 567 60 USLW 2746 CARTERET SAVINGS BANK, FAv.OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, in its own capacity and assuccessor in interest to Federal Home Loan Bank Board; T.Timothy Ryan, Jr., individually and in his official capacityas Director, Office of Thrift Supervision; Federal DepositInsurance Corporation, in its own capacity and as successorin interest to Federal Savings and Loan Insurance

Bell, Justice. John B. Fawcett, with other citizens and taxpayers of the City of Savannah, filed a suit in equity against the mayor and aldermen of the city, the marshal, and the city tax-assessors,. to enjoin the defendants from enforcing tax executions issued against the plaintiffs and levied upon their property; to restrain the board of tax-assessors from continuing in the year 1937 and in future years the assessing of real p

Taylor, C. Action in replevin to recover possession of two auditor’s warrants drawn by the auditor of Cass county on the treasurer of that county, one for the sum of $1,000; the other for the sum of $2,000. The warrants were issued October 19, 1921, and directed the treasurer to pay the amounts thereof to the order of L. & L. Construction Company and charge to a designated special road fund, “If there is money in the treasur

Rose, J. This is an action to recover a balance of $1,678.16 on five promissory notes. Defendant is maker and the Citizens State Bank of Petersburg, plaintiff, is payee. The suit was commenced February 4, 1911. An amended answer was filed June 5, 1911. It contains a general denial, alleges that defendant was a depositor of plaintiff with an unclosed bank account, and demands judgment for deposits and for conversion of

245 So.2d 142 (1971) Maxwell SAYET, M.D., D/B/a Atlantic Clinical Laboratories, Appellant, v. INTERSTATE BLOOD BANK, INC., Harold Lefelstein, Hialeah Hospital, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees. No. 70-913. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 23, 1971. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1971. *143

Hamersley, J. (dissenting). In the result announced by the majority of the court I concur, but not with the reasons given in support of that result. If the funds in question were accumulated by the defendant corporation in the transaction in this State of a business lawful under our laws, then such funds ought to be placed in the hands of Mr. Failey, the principal and domiciliary receiver appointed by the Indian

Controversy without action. The purpose of this proceeding is to determine the constitutionality of, and to construe an act of the General Assembly, chapter 180, Private Laws 1913, which reads as follows: AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF GASTONIA TO ISSUE BONDS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING $100,000, FOR STREET, SIDEWALK, AND HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS, GRADED SCHOOLS, WATERWORKS, SEWERAGE, AND ELECTRIC LIGHTS. The General Assembly of North Carolina do enact:

Whether a city or town has the right to incur an indebtedness for the erection and operation of plants for the supply of water and electric lights for municipal use, and to sell to its inhabitants, is a necessary municipal expense, is the question again presented to us for decision. Indebtedness incurred by a city or town for a supply of water stands on the same footing as indebtedness incurred for lighting purposes; and if such indebtedness be a necessary expense, then whether or no

417 F.2d 75 Harry GRANADER in his individual capacities of his separartebusinesses and as a stockholder and director of Public Bank,and as a member of the following classes; the classes beingthe stockholders of Public Bank, a Michigan bankingcorporation, and the Directors of the Public Bank, aMichigan banking corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PUBLIC BANK, a Michigan banking corporation et al.,Defendants-Appellees.</

172 N.W.2d 292 (1969) Thomas C.HUNT, Conservator and Trustee of North Central Fire & Casualty Co., et al., Appellants, v. STATE BANK, et al., Appellants, Harold L. Burke, et al., Respondents. Thomas C. HUNT, Conservator and Trustee of North Central Fire & Casualty Co., Respondent, v. NEVADA STATE BANK, et al., Defendants, Don F. Roberts, et al., Appellants, First National Bank of St. Paul, Respondent. Thomas C.