Cases

No. _____________ FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS In the Court of Appeals AUSTIN, TEXAS for the Fifteenth District of Texas 1/3/2025 4:01:27 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUBSTANTIVE CONSOLIDATION WITH RELATED CHAPTER 11 CASE OF R & S ST. ROSE, LLC1 Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa, United States Bankruptcy Judge On October 27, October 28, November 17, November 18 and November 21, 2014, an evidentiary hearing was conducted on the Motion for Substantive Consolidation with Related Chapter 11 Case of R & S St. Rose

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARCELO MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, No. 14-71742 AKA Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner, Agency No. A074-112-169 v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket. Nos. 49615, 49817, 49899 PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT ) NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, ) INDIANA, KENTUCKY, on behalf of itself, its ) staff, physicians and patients, and Caitlin ) Gustafson, M.D., on behalf of herself and her ) patients, ) ) Petitioners,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 331PA21 Filed 28 April 2023 COMMUNITY SUCCESS INITIATIVE; JUSTICE SERVED NC, INC; WASH AWAY UNEMPLOYMENT; NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; TIMOTHY LOCKLEAR; DRAKARUS JONES; SUSAN MARION; HENRY HARRISON; ASHLEY CAHOON; and SHAKITA NORMAN v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHI

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs R.H. and his father and guardian, Richard H. (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed this action against the Los Gatos Union School District, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation,1 Lisa Fraser, Lisa Nanez, Curtis Summers, and Dan Racimo (collectively, “Defend

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 255–381 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: On March 12, 2013, a jury convicted Defendant Gilberto Valle of conspiracy to commit kidnapping (Count One), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(e), and of conducting a computer search of a federal database that exceeded his authorized access (Count Two), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(B). (Verdict Form (Dkt. No. 126)) Valle ha

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

LOUGHRY, Chief Justice: The petitioners (plaintiffs below) are nine minors and their parents, individually and as parents, guardians, and next friends, 1 in this *434 action alleging various negligence claims, fraud, intentional infliction

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF CLAIM OF QUICK CAPITAL OF L.I. CORP. JOHN E. HOFFMAN JR., Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction The issue before the Court is whether Quick Capital of L.I. Corp. (“Quick Capital”) or any entity affiliated with it holds a claim against the Chapter 11 bankruptcy estate of George A. Bavelis (“Mr. Bavelis” or “Debtor”). Ted Douka

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 90,196 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. JOHN E. ROBINSON, SR., Appellant/Cross-appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A constitution-based clai

B. Contested Matters Also before the Court at Trial were the following contested matters (collectively, the "Contested Matters") filed in the Bankruptcy Case, related to Proofs of Claim 4-1 through 9-1 and CHFS's use of alleged cash collateral: Proofs of Claim 4-1 & 5-1 Objection to Claim of Beher Holdings Trust (Claim No. 4) and to Claim of Edwards F

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON REMAINING COUNTS OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT John E. Hoffman, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction When debtors commence Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, they become debtors in possession obligated to perform most of the duties of a trustee, including the duty to object to improper claims filed against the bankruptcy estate