Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Robert H. Wagner, J. Petitioners, minority shareholders of Rochester Community Baseball, Inc. (the Club), by order to show cause, seek a writ of mandamus pursuant to CPLR article 78 compelling respondents, officers and members of the board of directors of the Club, to hold an annual meeting of shareholders in January, 1982. Petitioners assert they are members of a “

WASHINGTON, Chief Judge: Richard Silver appeals his conviction for obstructing justice.1 He argues that the *1024trial court erred by rejecting his claim of a speedy trial violation and by allowing testimony regarding evidence from an illegal search. He also argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For the fo

22 A.3d 1279 (2011) 301 Conn. 922 David KERVICK, Executor (Estate of Ruth Farrell) v. SILVER HILL HOSPITAL et al. Not in Source Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided June 23, 2011. Rachel E. Katz and David J. Robertson, Bridgeport, in support of the petition. Sandra J. Akoury, in opposition. *1280</

3 A.3d 385 (2010) 2010 ME 88 Michael A. FARRELL v. CITY OF AUBURN. Docket: And-09-221 Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: January 14, 2010. Decided: August 31, 2010. *386 James E. Belleau, Esq., Darcie P.L. Beaudin, Esq. (orally), Skelton, Taintor & Abbott, Auburn, ME, for Michael

GREEN, Judge. The former husband challenges the trial court’s enforcement of a settlement agreement with his former wife, the terms of which were dictated to a court reporter at a pretrial deposition and later incorporated into a proposed written settlement agreement which the former husband refused to sign. The former husband argues as his first point on appeal that since the terms of the settlement required him, among ot

18 A.3d 622 (2011) 128 Conn.App. 341 David KERVICK, Executor (Estate of Ruth Farrell) v. SILVER HILL HOSPITAL et al. No. 29783. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued December 9, 2010. Decided May 3, 2011. *624 Sandra J. Akoury, for the appellant (plaintiff). Catherine S. Nietzel, S

12/07/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 24, 2021 Session KEVIN FARRELL WELLS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. C68-949 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

578 F.Supp. 1209 (1984) Rashmi C. SKADEGAARD, Plaintiff, v. Thomas D. FARRELL, Philip H. Witt, Howard Silverman and Ira Mintz, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-945. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 19, 1984. *1210 *1211 Neil Mullin, Mullin & Casteleiro, Hoboken, N.J., for pla

423 S.E.2d 863 (1992) 188 W.Va. 254 Anthony WILSON, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. LONG JOHN SILVER'S, INC., Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 20889. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 15, 1992. Decided October 23, 1992. *864 Mark H. Hayes, Huddleston, Bolen, Beatt

McMurray, Presiding Judge. Defendant was indicted and convicted of the offense of robbery by use of force. Defendant appeals. Held: 1. The victim testified that she was a realtor who, after showing an individual identifying himself as Ron Sweet, a particular house on a previous occasion, arranged to meet him there on June 11,1979, in order that his wife could see the house. The person, who identifie

Sweeney, J. ¶1 Ultimately, the parties to this suit are the homeowners and their insurance company. The suit follows a fire loss. A contractor sued the homeowners and their insurance company for failing to pay for the contractor’s repair work. The insurance company issued a check directly to the homeowners. The homeowners cashed the check but did not pay the contractor. So the insurance company wound up paying the contractor. The

DIETZ, Judge. *65In 2013, a Raleigh police officer pulled over a car driven by Petitioner Peter Farrell. When the officer approached Farrell, he noticed that Farrell's eyes were glassy and bloodshot and that his speech was slightly slurred. The officer returned to his patrol car to wait for backup. When he returned to question Farrell further, the

[Cite as Midland Funding. L.L.C. v. Farrell, 2013-Ohio-5509.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, d.b.a. : APPEAL NO. C-120674 MIDLAND FUNDING DE LLC, TRIAL NO. 12CV-10765 : Plaintiff-Appellee,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE PARAMOUNT GOLD AND SILVER CONSOLIDATED CORP. STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION C.A. No. 10499-CB MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 10, 2017 Date Decided: April 13, 2017 Seth D. Rigrodsky, Brian D. Long, Gina M. Serra, and Jeremy J. Riley, RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Derrick B. Farrell, DLA PIPER US LLP, Wilmington

271 Kan. 291 (2001) 21 P.3d 552 In the Matter of GEORGE F. FARRELL, JR., Respondent. No. 86,255. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 20, 2001. Frank D. Diehl, deputy disciplinary administrator, argued the cause, and Stanton A. Hazlett, disciplinary administrator, was on the formal complaint for petitioner. John J. Amb

OPINION OF THE COURT Cardona, P. J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.), entered July 26,1996 in Albany County, which partially denied petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2304 to, inter alia, quash a subpoena duces tecum. In 1995, the Legislature approved a proposal permitting petitioner, the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, to enter into a contract wi

650 F.Supp.2d 612 (2009) LONG JOHN SILVER'S, INC., Plaintiff, v. DIWA III, INC., Diwa IV, Inc., Diwa V, Inc., Wazir Kaisani, Iqbal Kaisani, Ashraf Nathani, Liyaqat A. Ajmeri, and Mehboob A. Malik, Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:08-CV-14. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington. January 15, 2009. *614</

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-1952 IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES DERIVATIVE SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 C 7246—James B. Moran, Judge.

GREENE, J. Petitioner (“Mr. Neustadter”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County and asserts that his constitutional right to the free exercise of his religion was infringed by rulings denying a two-day postponement or recess during his medical malpractice case so that he could *234observe an O

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 01-1952 IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES DERIVATIVE SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 C 7246--James B. Moran, Judge. ARGUED October 23, 2001--DECIDED June 6, 2002 Before HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., CUDAHY, and KANNE, Circuit Judges. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge. This shareholder derivative suit arises from a consent decree betw