Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Farrell v. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Servic”
Moskowitz v. Department of the Treasurypublic domain
PER CURIAM. The Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) affirmed Ms. Christine G. Moskowitz’s suspension from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and dismissed her claim of constructive discharge. Moskowitz v. Dep’t of Treasury, No. AT-0752-02-0207-1-1 (MSPB Sept. 12, 2003 & Oct. 17, 2003). Because this court finds no error in the Board’s determinations, this court affirms. I.
Eric N. Umbach v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph D. Specking v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuepublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. In these appeals, we decide whether taxpayers Eric N. Umbach and Joseph D. Specking (Taxpayers) may exclude from gross income their compensation earned while working on Johnston Island, a United States possession, in 1995, 1996, and 1997. Taxpayers sought to exclude their compensation under either 26 U.S.C. § 911, which excludes income earned in a foreign c
Dale v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
238 F.Supp.2d 99 (2002) Billy Ray DALE, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 20, 2002. *100 Larry Elliot Klayman, Judicial Watch, Incorporated, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Stuart David Gibson, Washington, DC, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION</
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-4400 (CKK) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 6, 2026) The Plainti
Paul E. Farrell Frances G. Farrell v. United Statespublic domain
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge. We hold today that income earned by a taxpayer on Johnston Island, a U.S. insular possession, is not excludable from gross income as “foreign earned income” under § 911 of the Internal Revenue Code. Neither is it income derived from a source within a “specified possession” as defined by § 931 of the Code. We therefore affirm the district court.
In Re Farrellpublic domain
211 B.R. 79 (1997) In re Thomas Thornton FARRELL, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96-02805-6B3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. March 24, 1997. Bruce Kaufman, Largo, FL, for debtor. Laurie K. Weatherford, Winter Park, FL, trustee. Randy Gold, Orlando, FL, for U.S. Dept. of Treasury, IRS. MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ Nos. 20-1749 and 20-1766 _______________________ GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, Appellant in No. 20-1766 v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,
Authority of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery to Oversee Programs Established Under the CARES Actpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) Authority of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery to Oversee Programs Established Under the CARES Act The jurisdiction of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery is limited to oversight of programs established under the Coronavirus Economic Stabilization Act of 2020. April 29, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ACTING GENERAL COUNS
ACCEPTED 15-25-00116-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/18/2025 11:41 PM No. 15-25-00116-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Farrell v. Rouanpublic domain
ORDER JOINER, District Judge. This action was originally filed in the 1st Judicial District Court of Michigan against Patrick Rouan, who is alleged to be “a Federal Officer in the employ of the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, State of Michigan”, Complaint, ¶ 3. As such, the case could properly be, and was, removed to this Court by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1442, which provides in part that:
Lee v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BLOCH, District Judge. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment (document No. 44) in this action. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part, and, accordingly, Counts II, III, IV, VII, and XII *278of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
E.T. v. the Boys and Girls Club of Hudson Countypublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. E.T. v. The Boys and Girls Club of Hudson County (A-69-24) (089237) Argued November 17, 2025 -- Decided August 19, 2026 JUSTICE WAINER APTER, writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court consider
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Matish, Acting Chief Justice: *259 The Petitioner, the Honorable Margaret L. Workman, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, brought this proceeding under the original jurisdiction of this Court as a petition for a writ of mandamus that seeks to halt impeachment proc
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (Naca) v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmentpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (“NACA”) claims that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) announced a rule specifically designed to punish NACA for advocacy that has seen the organization at odds with the government.
State of Texas v. Harris County, Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/9/2025 6:07 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
State of Texas v. Harris County, Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
In Re the Salary of the Juvenile Directorpublic domain
87 Wn.2d 232 (1976) 552 P.2d 163 In the Matter of the Salary of the JUVENILE DIRECTOR. No. 44028. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. June 24, 1976. Philip W. Borst, Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Hamblen, Gilbert & Brooke, P.S. (William F. Nielsen, of counsel), for respondent. UTTER, J. The L
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4407712 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS