Cases

USCA11 Case: 22-12590 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 12/12/2023 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12590 ____________________ CHRISTOPHER OUNJIAN,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1800 PIT ROW, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

312 Ga. 752 FINAL COPY S21A0718, S21X0719. ROCKDALE COUNTY v. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al.; and vice versa. NAHMIAS, Chief Justice. This case arises from Rockdale County’s denial of an application for a permit to build a QuikTrip on property owned by William Corey and U.S. Enterprises, Inc. (the “Owners”), on the ground that the proposed facility is a “truck stop,” which is a prohibited use under the County’s Unified Development Ordinance (“UDO”). After the

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 2, 2021 S21A0718. ROCKDALE COUNTY v. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. S21X0719. U.S. ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. v. ROCKDALE COUNTY. NAHMIAS, Chief Justice. This case arises from Rockdale County’s denial of an application for a permit to build a QuikTrip on property owned by William Corey and U.S. Enterprises, Inc. (the “Owners”), on the groun

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 03-4428 WILLIAM HASKELL FARMER, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie,

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, THE TIMKEN COMPANY, MPB CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2012-1269 ______________________ Appe

732 So.2d 1180 (1999) James Joseph McFADDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-3911. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 28, 1999. *1181 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney G

316 Ga. 44 FINAL COPY S22A1060, S22X1061. TAYLOR v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. et al.; and vice versa. WARREN, Justice. This appeal and cross-appeal stem from the sexual assault of a 15-year-old girl, Tia McGee (whose interests are represented by Jo- Ann Taylor, the executor of her estate), while McGee was living in a behavioral health facility that was operated by the Devereux Foundation (“Devereux”).1 The sexual assault was perpetrated by Jimmy Sing

28 March 2000 NOS. 4-97-1096, 4-98-0268 cons. IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT ADAMS FARM; ALLEN BROTHERS; WILLIAM P. ) Appeal from ANDERSON; CALVIN APPLEGATE; DUANE ) Circuit Court of BARSCHDORF; BENDIXEN FARM; ADA BENSON; ) L

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend

526 S.W.2d 407 (1975) LABOR DISCOUNT CENTER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF WELLSTON (now named First State Bank & Trust Company), et al., Defendants-Respondents. No. 35229. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District. May 20, 1975. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied June 26, 1975. Application to Tran

Hatfield, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of natural ruscus leaves and natural wheat stems and heads. It was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem under the following provisions of paragraph 1419 of the Tariff Act of 1922: Par. 1419. * * * natural leaves, plants, shrubs, herbs, trees, and parts t

*530Mr. Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the. Court. This is an appeal from the decree1 of a specially constituted District Court2 perpetually enjoining the appellants from enforcing against the appellee the provisions of Act No. 207 of 1929 of the General Assembly of the State of Indiana.