⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GORDON COLLEGE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-614 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEW CENTURY FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24 - 1612 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) 1306 LOUNGE, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-3320 (RBW) ) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ) e
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 32× · 990 F.3d 217
20-2170-cv Pharaohs GC, Inc. v. United States Small Business Administration 1 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 August Term, 2020 6 7 (Argued: November 3, 2020 Decided: March 4, 2021) 8 9 Docket No. 20-2170-cv 10 _____________________________________ 11 12
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WP COMPANY LLC d/b/a THE WASHINGTON POST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1240 (JEB) U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Six months ago, this Freedom of Information Act case — brought by a host of national news organizatio
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WP COMPANY LLC d/b/a THE WASHINGTON POST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1240 (JEB) U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1614 (JEB) U.S. SMALL BUSINESS A
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-08-05 · Published · cited 9× · 151 F. Supp. 3d 49; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102168; 2015 WL 4647926
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge •The Effluent Limitation Guidelines (“ELGs”)' are federal requirements that limit what toxins may be discharged from coal-fired power plants-.- Plaintiffs Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice, and Sierra Club-filed Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requests with'
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-05-26 · Published · cited 3× · 190 F. Supp. 3d 61; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69077
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Re Document Nos.: 14, 20 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff The Desa Group, Inc. (“TDG”) initiated this action under the
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 254 F. Supp. 3d 22; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71664
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge In March of 2014, Plaintiff Cognitive Professional Services (“CPS”) applied to the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) for admission to the 'Section 8(a) Business Development program (“Section 8(a) program” or “8(a) BD program”). (See Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶ 11.) SBA d
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-11-11 · Published · cited 0× · 20 F. Supp. 3d 104; 2013 WL 5974064; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160284
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff CS-360, LLC (“CS-360” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action against De *107 fendant United States Small Business Administration (“Defendant” or “SBA”) seeking a declaratory judgment setting aside
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-04-24 · Published · cited 13× · 858 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2012 WL 1403375; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56636
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Elk Associates Funding Corporation (“ELK”) brings this action against the United States Small Business Administration (the “SBA”), 1 seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-12-04 · Published · cited 27× · 92 F. App'x 112
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. On March 29, 2001, plaintiffs David and Coleen Sutton (“the Suttons”) filed an amended complaint against the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) on the following five claims: 1) declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the SBA on the ground that its foreclosure on plaintiffs’ property was faulty because the SBA lacked title or interest in the property due to the mortgage having been alte
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CROWLEY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-cv-2298 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Crowley Government S
District Court, District of Columbia · 1996-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 916 F. Supp. 37; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2528; 1996 WL 93638
916 F.Supp. 37 (1996) Joan BLOCKER d/b/a Small World Christian Childcare Center, Plaintiff, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and Dayton Watkins, in her capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration, Defendants. Civ. Action No. 95-1954 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 1, 1996. *38 C
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 84 F.3d 1294
ON REHEARING EN BANC PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge. The Small Business Administration appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Debtors Curtis Lawayne Turner and Rita Gail Turner. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in favor of the Debtors in an adversary proceeding, ruling that the United States’ setoff of payments owed by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004-02-26 · Published · cited 2× · 305 F. Supp. 2d 614; 2004 WL 369876
305 F.Supp.2d 614 (2004) METRO MACHINE CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, and Michael P. McCale,[1] in his official capacity as Associate Administrator of the HUBZone Program Defendants. No. CIV.A.2:03 CV 838. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. February 26, 2004. *615
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994-09-09 · Published · cited 13× · 864 F. Supp. 1254; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13414; 1994 WL 515910
864 F.Supp. 1254 (1994) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Plaintiff, v. Guido ECHEVARRIA, Sr. et al., Defendants. No. 91-0033-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. September 9, 1994. *1255 *1256 *1257 Jeffrey Roth, Jeffrey Roth P.A.,
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 331PA21 Filed 28 April 2023 COMMUNITY SUCCESS INITIATIVE; JUSTICE SERVED NC, INC; WASH AWAY UNEMPLOYMENT; NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; TIMOTHY LOCKLEAR; DRAKARUS JONES; SUSAN MARION; HENRY HARRISON; ASHLEY CAHOON; and SHAKITA NORMAN v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHI
Small v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 12× · 211 A.3d 236; 464 Md. 68
Argued before: Barbera, C.J. Greene, * Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Greene, J. **74 *239 Ordinarily,
Small v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 464 Md. 68
Malik Small v. State of Maryland, No. 19, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Greene, J. CRIMINAL LAW – CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION – PHOTO ARRAY The Court of Appeals reviewed the long-standing Manson-Jones framework, which is the proper test for assessing the admissibility of evidence of an extrajudicial identification procedure that is challenged on due process grounds. Applying the Manson-Jones test to the present case, the Court determined that the second of two photo array