Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FRONT SIGHT MANAGEMENT LLC, A No. 81776 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TIMO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FRONT SIGHT MANAGEMENT LLC, A No. 80242 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JAN 2 3 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;

ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge This is the third iteration of a securities fraud class action that was most recently dismissed for failure to allege the required level of scienter. See Dkt. No. 143. To fix their scienter problem, the plaintiffs have amended their complaint to include statements from two confidential witnesses who previously worked at SanDisk

31 A.3d 583 (2011) 423 Md. 387 Mary THOMAS v. PANCO MANAGEMENT OF MARYLAND, LLC, et al. No. 133, September Term, 2010. Court of Appeals of Maryland. October 31, 2011. *585 Steven M. Weisbaum (The Weisbaum Law Firm, Rockville, MD), on brief, for petitioner. Gregg E. Viola (Mark Anthony Kozlowski of E

*153 MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case illustrates the value of a jury-trial in an adjudicatory system apparently devoted almost entirely to efficiency. Its broad outlines are briefly limned. The well-prepared plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment. Its outcome was all but a foregone con

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF ) SAN ANTONIO, DERMSA ) MANAGEMENT, INC., and ) WILLIAM T. PARSONS, M.D., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0665-KSJM ) OLIVER STREET DERMATO

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge This is a challenge to a permit issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service *1120("the Service") authorizing a construction company to engage in activities that may significantly disturb a pair of bald eagles that maintain a nest in the City and County of Broomfield, Colorado ("Broo

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge During the early hours of August 24, 2014, an unidentified group of individuals assaulted Appellant Henry Mu ("Mu") in the lobby of the Omni Providence Hotel (the "Hotel"), which Appellee Omni Hotels Management Corporation ("Omni") operates. Mu sued Omni for negligence. The district court granted summary judgment to Omni, finding Mu's claims deficient with res

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-2993 & 19-3109 RENETRICE R. PIERRE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.,

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT { In Re Univest Mgmt., Inc. { Docket No. 180-12-11 Vtec & Gerardi (Waiver) { { Decision on Multiple Motions Currently before this Court are two motions for summary judgment. The first, f

ACCEPTED 15-24-00133-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/7/2025 4:28 PM No. 15-24-00133-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1501 NANTUCKET RESIDENTS AGAINST TURBINES; VALLORIE OLIVER, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. U.S. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT; NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION; NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; DEBRA HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior; GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce; VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC,

SEITZ, Justice: In 2010, Congress enacted the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act which made major changes to the national school lunch program. The Act required the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”) to develop new regulations to take effect in 2012 to address new nutritional guidelines. In 2011, Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (“Heartland”), a credit card processing

JAMES R. SWEENEY II, JUDGE Defendant IAC Greencastle, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50 ) is fully briefed and ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. I. Background Plaintiff Jeffrey Renfroe alleges claims against Defendant IAC Greencastle, LLC ("Defendant" o

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Eva Agerbrink is a fit model. She signed a representation contract with Defendant Model Service LLC ("MSA"), but left on bad terms. Agerbrink claims that MSA misclassified her as an independent contractor when she was really an employee. She also sues for unjust enrichment because MSA withheld some of her earnings after she left. MSA counterclaims for breach of contract and tortious interfer

674 F.Supp.2d 745 (2009) JAMES RIVER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael P. KEHOE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09cv387. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Virginia. December 8, 2009. *747 Steven K. Davidson, Emily Brooke Nestler, Jared Butcher, John F. O'Connor, Michael J. Baratz

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. We agreed to hear this appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which permits interlocutory review of orders granting or denying class action certification, to address whether Rule 23(b)(3) imposes a heightened “ascertainability” requirement as the Third Circuit and some district courts have held recently. See, e.g., Carrera v. Bayer C

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Amy Witham claims she was fired from her position as a hotel general manager because she sought workers’ compensation after sustaining injuries on the job. The hotel claims it fired her because she engaged in a heated verbal exchange, followed by a physical confrontation, with someone who walked into the lobby. Happily for

05/26/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 15, 2020 Session GARDENIA PARKER, ET AL. v. EPSTEIN ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003285-11, CT-003286-11 Jerry Stokes, Judge ________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-WC-00941-COA DANIEL LADNER APPELLANT v. HINTON HOMES LLC AND AMFED APPELLEES CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/17/2024 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALED: COMMISSION A