⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “FOGG v. GARLAND”

Fogg v. Garlandpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW FOGG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-0792 (CRC) PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Defendant. ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that [12] Plaintiff’
Fogg v. Garlandpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW FOGG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-0792 (CRC) PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Defendant. OPINION Former Deputy United States Marshal Matthew Fogg brought a complaint before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Fogg v. Garlandpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW FOGG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-0792 (CRC) PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Former Deputy United States Marshal Matthew Fogg has spent decades litigating against the U.S. Marshals Service ov
Fogg v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007-06-29 · Published · cited 65× · 492 F.3d 447; 377 U.S. App. D.C. 148; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15484; 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,875; 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1601; 2007 WL 1855062
492 F.3d 447 (2007) Matthew F. FOGG, Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General for the United States Department of Justice, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 05-5439, 05-5440. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued January 12, 2007. Decided June 29, 2007. *448
Garlandpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927-02-23 · Published · cited 18× · 126 Me. 84; 136 A. 459; 1927 Me. LEXIS 13
Wilson, C. J. This case is before this Court on exceptions to the admission of certain evidence submitted to a jury in the Supreme *87Court of Probate, and to certain instructions by the presiding Justice to the jury, and also to his decree. The first question that arose at the trial was over the right of the appellant to amend her reasons of appeal. The q
Illinois Supreme Court · 1883-06-16 · Published · cited 2× · 108 Ill. 220; 1883 Ill. LEXIS 74
Mr. Justice Craig, dissenting: I do not concur with a majority of the court in the decision of this case, and I have concluded to give my reasons for dissenting. On the 23d day of November, 1876, the Insurance Company of 'North America issued to Maria G. McConnell a policy of insurance on her dwelling house in Winnetka, for §3000, to be in force
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1882-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 9 Ill. App. 571; 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 209
Bailey, J. Two questions are presented by this record, upon the solution of which the decision of the case must mainly depend, viz: 1. Were the agents of the insurance company notified that the building insured was vacant and unoccupied at the time the company’s consent was given to the assignment of the policy? 2. Did said agents, at the time
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 6× · 493 F. App'x 110
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the Di
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 2× · 892 F.3d 1271
Kavanaugh, Circuit Judge A jury convicted Marlon Haight of several drug- and gun-related offenses. The District Court sentenced Haight to 12 years and 8 months in prison. Haight appeals his conviction on three grounds. He challenges the District Court's refusal to postpone his trial. He contests two of the District Court's evidentiary rulings at trial. And he raise
Ponce v. Billingtonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-05-18 · Published · cited 44× · 679 F.3d 840; 400 U.S. App. D.C. 359; 2012 WL 1759981; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10025; 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,520; 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1
679 F.3d 840 (2012) Jorge PONCE, Appellant v. James H. BILLINGTON, Librarian, United States Library of Congress, Appellee. No. 11-5117. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 9, 2012. Decided May 18, 2012. *842 Michael J. Kator argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 1× · 314 F. Supp. 3d 223
7 There is one wrinkle when applying this general rule. When a court is "dealing with a so-called 'divisible' statute," it must "employ the 'modified categorical approach' to determine which alternative crime the defendant committed." United States v. Redrick , 841 F.3d 478, 482 (D.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-08-07 · Published · cited 4× · 402 U.S. App. D.C. 106; 687 F.3d 1332; 2012 WL 3181717; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16343; 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,608; 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1157
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. GARLAND, Circuit Judge: There is no dispute that the State Department terminated the employment of John R. Miller, Jr., a United States citizen working abroad, solely because he turned sixty-five years old. Indeed, it is the position of the Department that it is free to terminat
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002-03-29 · Published · cited 13× · 284 F.3d 131; 350 U.S. App. D.C. 296; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5288; 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 817; 2002 WL 471282
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: Don W. Crockett sued the Department of Energy in district court, claiming that the Department of Energy’s failure to promote him to Assistant General Counsel for Contractor Litigation in 1997, and again in
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026-04-23 · Published · cited 1× · 321 Neb. 246
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/23/2026 08:07 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 321 Neb. 246
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/01/2026 01:12 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel
Huff v. Vilsackpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-07-05 · Published · cited 1× · 195 F. Supp. 3d 343; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86463; 2016 WL 3661111
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge For the past twenty-three months, Plaintiff John T. Huff, who is a private real-estate developer and the General Partner of several business entities that own multifamily housing projects in the state of Alabama, has been seeking permission from the Rural Development (“RD”)
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992-09-01 · Published · cited 103× · 421 S.E.2d 877; 15 Va. App. 1; 9 Va. Law Rep. 167; 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 229
Benton, X, with whom Koontz, C.X, and Barrow, X, join, dissenting. I concur with the views expressed in Judge Elder’s dissenting opinion that the initial detentions of William E. Brown and the automobile were constitutionally impermissible. However, I would reverse the conviction and dismiss the case because the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.
State v. Kneelandpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988-12-14 · Published · cited 14× · 552 A.2d 4; 1988 Me. LEXIS 327
CLIFFORD, Justice. Based on the evidence gathered at an investigatory stop of his motor vehicle, the defendant, Richard Kneeland, was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R. S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1987). Under the provisions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A, the State of Maine appeals from a order of the District Court (Bath; Henry, J.), granting Kneeland’s motion to suppre
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986-01-17 · Published · cited 235× · 338 S.E.2d 844; 230 Va. 471; 1986 Va. LEXIS 148
338 S.E.2d 844 (1986) Lonnie Brack DREW v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 840511. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 17, 1986. David L. William (Sacks, Sacks & Larkin, Norfolk, on brief), for appellant. Marla Lynn Graff, Asst. Atty. Gen. (William G. Broaddus, Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee. Present: All the Justices. POFF, Justice
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 18, 2018 Session CINDY HATFIELD, ET AL. v. ALLENBROOKE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004249-10 Donna M. Fields, Judge