Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “FLORES GARCIA v. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION”
Sanchez Mora v. U.S. Customs and Border Protectionpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JULIAN SANCHEZ MORA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24-3136 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Lyon v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcementpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket Nos. 120, 139 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The instant action is brought on behalf of a certified class of adult immigration detainees who are or will be held by Defendant United States Immigra
Ms. L. v. U.S Immigration & Customs Enforcementpublic domain
A. Likelihood of Success "The first factor under Winter is the most important-likely success on the merits." Garcia v. Google, Inc. , 786 F.3d 733, 740 (9th Cir. 2015). While Plaintiffs carry the burden of demonstrating likelihood of success, they are not required to prove their case in full
Jenny Flores v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: In 1997, the plaintiff class (“Flores”) and the government entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement”) which “sets out nationwide policy for the detention, release, and treatment of minors in the custody of the INS.” Settlement ¶ 9. The Settlement creates a presumption in favor of releasing minors and requires plac
Pellegrino v. U.S. Transp. SEC. Admin.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 15-3047 ___________ NADINE PELLEGRINO; HARRY WALDMAN, Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Div. of Dept. of Homeland Security; TSA TSO NUYRIAH ABDUL-M
Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.public domain
(1) DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; (2) DENYING PETITIONER'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY; (3) DENYING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT; (4) DENYING PETITIONER'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY STAY AS MOOT; AND (5) DENYING THE JOINT MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR PETITIONER'S EMERGENCY MOTIO
Castro v. U.S. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM Diamond, District Judge Petitioners — twenty-nine Central American women and their thirty-five minor children — were seized by the Department of Homeland Security within minutes of their illegal entry into the United States. Acting pursuant to the Immigration and Naturalization Act, DHS ordered their “expedited removal” after finding that none had a “credible fear” of torture or persecution upon
Garcia Pinach v. Bondipublic domain
22-6421(L) Garcia Pinach v. Bondi In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 Nos. 22-6421 (L), 24-26 (CON) JOAQUIN GARCIA PINACH, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GE
Flores v. Lynchpublic domain
The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1146I. INTRODUCTION On August 12, 2016, Plaintiffs Jenny L. Flores and other class members filed a motion to enforce the parties' 19-year-old consent decree1 ("the Flores Agreemen
United States v. Francisco Florespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 10, 2020 Decided April 23, 2021 No. 19-3100 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. FRANCISCO CARBAJAL FLORES, ALSO KNOWN AS DALMATA, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cr-0
Jenny Flores v. Jeffrey Rosenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JENNY LISETTE FLORES, No. 19-56326 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:85-cv-04544- DMG-AGR JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General; CHAD F. WOLF; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND OPINION SECURITY; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
Flores v. Lynchpublic domain
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION “An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it. ” —Mahatma Gandhi On February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to enforce th
Flores v. Johnsonpublic domain
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [100,120] Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The original complaint in this action was filed on July 11, 1985. [Doc. # 1.] On January 28, 1997, the Court approved a class-wide set
Jenny Flores v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JENNY LISETTE FLORES, et al., No. 17-56297 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. 2:85-cv-04544- DMG-AGR WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security; OPINION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U
United States v. Edwin Florespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50096 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cr-00268-MMA-1 EDWIN RICARDO FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ca
N. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DIEGO N. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00577 (CJN) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal law requires that, when unaccompanied children arrive at the United States border, they must b
Mendia v. Garciapublic domain
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bernardo Mendia’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Mot. to Am., Dkt. No. 101. Defendants John M. Garcia, Ching Chang, and the Un
Garcia Morales v. Blanchepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LESTER J GARCIA MORALES; No. 25-1760 SHEYLA MONROY TAY; L. J. I. Agency Nos. G. M.; I. G. M.; J. G. M., A240-533-133 A240-533-134 Petitioners, A240-533-135
United States v. Garcia-Sierrapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2503 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ADOLFO LEÓN GARCÍA-SIERRA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Saul Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Defendant-Appellant Saul Garcia-Sanchez appeals his 37-month sentence of imprisonment following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation. We affirm. I. Facts & Procedural History Garcia-Sanchez is a citizen of El Salvador not authorized to live in the United States.