Cases

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S CONTINGENT MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. In this lawsuit, the Plaintiffs seek insurance coverage under a specific policy that was in effect between 1998 and 1999. Before this Court are three motions for summary judg

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-589 No. COA21-654 Filed 6 September 2022 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 12925 COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, d/b/a CCA NORTH CAROLINA; BRUCE C. ABBOTT; CHARLES P. ADAMS, JR.; CONSTANTINE A. ARETAKIS, II; FREDERICK L. BERRY; ANDREW R. BOYD; HARRY T. BRANCH; TROY D. BRANHAM; RUPERT D. BROWN; JUDITH C. BULLOCK; WILLIAM L. BYRD, JR.; JOHNNY L. CA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-589 No. COA21-654 Filed 6 September 2022 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 12925 COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, d/b/a CCA NORTH CAROLINA; BRUCE C. ABBOTT; CHARLES P. ADAMS, JR.; CONSTANTINE A. ARETAKIS, II; FREDERICK L. BERRY; ANDREW R. BOYD; HARRY T. BRANCH; TROY D. BRANHAM; RUPERT D. BROWN; JUDITH C. BULLOCK; WILLIAM L. BYRD, JR.; JOHNNY L. CA

721 F.Supp.2d 465 (2010) Michele M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. BSN MEDICAL, INC., Defendant. No. 3:09cv284-RJC-DSC. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. June 11, 2010. *467 Amy Yager Jenkins, McAngus, Goudelock & Courie, LLC, Charleston, SC, Sylvan Stephen Lang, Jr., Lang Law Firm, San Antonio, T

James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge Three sets of motions are pending before the Court. First are Defendants Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter"), Scientific Protein Laboratories, LLC ("SPL"), and American Capital Limited's ("ACAS") (collectively "Defendants") motions to exclude Plaintiffs Charlisa, Joshua, and Jennifer Allen's (collectively "Plaintiffs") expert witnesses Ronald Moore, (Doc. 149), Suzanne Pari

912 A.2d 104 (2006) 189 N.J. 28 DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alberta HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 14, 2006. Decided August 9, 2006. *107 Madeline L. Houston argued the cause for appellant (Houston & Totaro, attorneys). Martin C.

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

838 P.2d 790 (1992) FIREMAN'S FUND MORTGAGE CORPORATION (as agent for Alaska Housing Finance Corporation), Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; First National Bank of Anchorage, and Gary Severance, Personal Representative of the Estate of Marjorie Severance Hoover, Appellees. No. S-4298. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 11, 1992.

OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Wisconsin Resources Protection Council, Center for Biological Diversity and Laura Gauger bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief and civil penalties under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1). Plaintiffs contend that defendant Flambeau Mining Company is violating the Clean Water Act by discharg

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/10/2016 08:06 AM CDT - 718 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 293 Nebraska R eports STATE v. OLDSON Cite as 293 Neb. 718 State of Nebraska, a

BERZON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff organizations Ecological Rights Foundation (“ERF”) and Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation (“Mateel”) brought this lawsuit against Pacific Lumber Company alleging various violations of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, better known as the Clean Water Act, see 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., at

4/December 2006—MDC Court Michigan Supreme Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Wea

WALTERS, Justice pro tem. On November 19, 2004, a jury found Azad Haji Abdullah guilty of first-degree murder, first-degree arson, three counts of attempted first-degree murder, and felony injury to a child. The ease proceeded to sentencing and the jury found the existence of two aggravating circumstances. The jury also found that all the mitigating circumstances when weighed ag

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of a shipment of bagged soybean meal from New Orleans, Louisiana, to Puerto Limón, Costa Rica. When the cargo arrived in Puerto Limón, tallies of the cargo showed that some of the bags were wet, some torn and slack, and some shortlanded. Plaintiffs-appellees brought two admiralty actio

4/December 2006—MDC Court Michigan Supreme Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Wea

404 F.Supp.2d 676 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. David Paul HAMMER No. 4:CR-96-239. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. December 27, 2005. *677 *678 *679 Frederick E. Martin, Williamsport, PA, Gwynn X. Kinsey, U.S. Department of Justice, Wa

DUBINA, Chief Judge, and HULL, Circuit Judge: Soon after Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), amended by Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“HCERA”), Pub.L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) (the “Act”), the plaintiffs brought this action challenging the Act’s constitutionality. The plaintiffs are 26 states, private individual

107 Mich. App. 110 (1981) 309 N.W.2d 910 MORRIS v. METRIYAKOOL. Docket No. 46598. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided June 5, 1981. Lopatin, Miller, Bindes, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich & Rosen, P.C. (by Steven G. Silverman), for plaintiff. Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier (by Edward C. Reynolds, Jr.),

*229ON MANDATORY REVIEW Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: 1. A general court-martial composed of officers convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of premeditated murder, felony murder, attempted murder, and robbery (5 specifications), in violation of Articles 118, 80, and 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §