Cases

783 F.Supp.2d 76 (2011) Karen FELD, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth FELD, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1557 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 8, 2011. Christopher E. Hassell, Nimalan Amirthalingam, Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Crociata, LLP, Steven Michael Oster, Oster *77 Law Firm, Washington, DC, A. Steven

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) KAREN FELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1557 (ESH) ) KENNET

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) KAREN FELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-479 (ESH) ) KENNETH

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 16, 2000, *394which denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claims for replevin and conversion based on the Statute of Limitations and granted that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs fraud claim based on the Statute of Limitations, unanimously m

Spain, J. Cross appeals (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Nicolai, J.), entered May 11, 1993 in Westchester County, which, inter alia, partially granted plaintiff’s motion for a downward modification of child support. The parties were divorced in 1989; plaintiff’s child support obligation was established at $1,000 per mont

Probuden.

Proh.dism.

Pet. den.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 10-1-00361-3, Michael E. Rickert, J., entered June 6, 2012. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Spearman, C.J., and Lau, J.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: Karen Feld sued her brother, Kenneth Feld, after he had her forcibly removed from the building in which he owned a condominium she was visiting. She appeals the district court’s judgment that Kenneth was entitled to use reasonable force to do so. For the reasons that follow,

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants Randy J. Feld, Carl S. Schreiber, and North Nassau Cardiology Associates, PC., appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sher, J.), dated April 16, 2013, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) from a j

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNETH FELD, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 12-1789 (JDB) FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this long-running dispute against his insurer, defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (“FFIC”), plaintiff Kenn

WIGGINS, Justice (concurring specially). I concur in the result by joining in divisions I and 111(A) of Justice Appel’s special concurrence. The majority opinion clings to the contact-sports exception on the grounds neither party urges its abandonment. As Justice Appel rightly points out in division I of his special concurrence, the question of the continued viability of the contact-sports exception is cl

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This action arises out of an allegedly defamatory tweet.1 In November 2010, plaintiff Mara Feld arranged for her thoroughbred gelding, Munition, to be shipped to a horse farm. He was instead sent to a horse auction and may have eventually been slaughtered in Canada. Munition’s fate became a topi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNETH FELD, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 12-1789 (JDB) FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kenneth Feld and his insurer, defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (“FFIC”), have been fighting over attorney’s fe

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Ann Williams, J.), entered February 23, 2009, after a jury trial in a medical malpractice action, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No basis exists to disturb the verdict (see McDermott v Coffee Beanery, Ltd., 9 AD3d 195, 206-207 [2004]), “especially [as] resolution of the case turns on an evaluation of conflicting expert testimony” (Fontana v Kur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNETH FELD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-1789 (JDB) FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Kenneth Feld filed this lawsuit to obtain reimbursement for legal expenses under an insurance policy from Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GEOFFREY TAYLOR’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND GRANTING HIS MOTION FOR MISJOINDER LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Defendant Geoffrey Taylor (“Taylor”) moves to dismiss the fifth cause of action— eavesdropping, in violation of section 632(a) of the California Penal Code—in Plaintiff Joseph Cuviello’s (“Plaintiff’) Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed

17 A.3d 1197 (2011) FELD v. SHEINBAUM. No. 10-CV-531. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. April 13, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Edwards, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Kenneth Feld ("Feld") retained the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP ("Fulbright") in 2008 to defend him in an action brought by his sister, Karen Feld ("Karen"). After a jury trial, Feld prevailed in that action. This case is a follow-up to the action between Feld and his sister. It involves a claim by Feld against appellee, Fireman's Fu