Cases

ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. INTRODUCTION “If you shoot at a king, you must kill him.”1 The modern political version: “Make sure you pick the winner.” Plaintiffs Terri Ezell (“Ezell”) and Donna Tompkins (“Tompkins”), Muscogee County deputy sheriffs, picked their boss, incumbent Muscogee County Sheriff Ralph Johnson (“Johnson”), when they

COOKS, Judge. *939FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The State of Louisiana (the State) and the Vermilion Parish School Board (VPSB) sued various defendants including Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL) seeking remediation of the Sixteenth Section school lands in Vermilion Parish. The land is owned by the State

COOKS, Judge. *939FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The State of Louisiana (the State) and the Vermilion Parish School Board (VPSB) sued various defendants including Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL) seeking remediation of the Sixteenth Section school lands in Vermilion Parish. The land is owned by the State

EZELL, Judge. []This case involves the application of Louisiana’s Recreational Use Immunity Statutes in dismissing Christy Moore’s claim for damages for the death of her husband who was shot while hunting. Christy argues that, even though Defendants fall within the protective provisions of the recreational use statutes, they agreed by the terms of a hunting license agreement to add certain safety obligations and requirements s

968 S.W.2d 855 (1997) Charles W. BERNARD and wife, Karen Bernard, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. HOUSTON EZELL CORPORATION, the City of Brentwood, Tennessee and Land Investment Corporation, Defendants/Appellees. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Knoxville. October 10, 1997. Permission to Appeal Denied April 20, 1998. William Kennerly Burger, Murfreesboro,

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/04/2023 08:08 AM CDT - 825 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 314 Nebraska Reports STATE V. EZELL Cite as 314 Neb. 825 State of Nebraska, appe

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/11/2023 01:06 AM CDT - 825 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 314 Nebraska Reports STATE V. EZELL Cite as 314 Neb. 825 State of Nebraska, appe

DECUIR, Judge. |Jn this environmental remediation case, the State of Louisiana and the Vermilion Parish School Board contest three adverse rulings by three separate courts. These three matters have been consolidated for this appeal. FACTS The State of Louisiana and the Vermilion Parish School Board (hereinafter collectively “School Board”) seek remediation of a polluted sixteenth section

GREMILLION, Judge. hThe plaintiff, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, O’Neal Jones, Jr., finding that its claims against Jones had been extinguished due to the peremption periods provided by La.R.S. 9:5605 and 9:5606. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On December 9, 2000, Commonwealth and J

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, United States District Court Judge, Northern District of Illinois Chicago residents Rhonda Ezell, Joseph Brown, and William Hespen, along -with organizations, Action Target, Inc., Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and the Illinois State Rifle Association brought this action against the City of Chicago, alleging that various regulations within t

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Ezell appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Rick Burton in the parties’ dispute over Ezell’s investment in an Arizona land development venture in which Burton was involved. Ezell alleged that Burton violated federal securities laws and Nevada state law1 by misleading Ezell about the potential f

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Ezell appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Rick Burton in the parties’ dispute over Ezell’s investment in an Arizona land development venture in which Burton was involved. Ezell alleged that Burton violated federal securities laws and Nevada state law1 by misleading Ezell about the potential f

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules Apr

SYKES, Circuit Judge. This case returns to us with new controversies arising from Chicago’s response to *890Heller and McDonald,1 the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment decisions. Last time we addressed an ordinance banning shooting ranges throughout the city. See Ezell v. City of Chicago (“Ezell

582 S.E.2d 679 (2003) STATE of North Carolina v. Naeem Maurice EZELL, Defendant. No. COA02-448. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 15, 2003. *680 Attorney General Roy Cooper by Assistant Attorney General Daniel D. Addison, for the State. Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. HUDSON, Judge.

SYKES, Circuit Judge. For nearly three decades, the City of Chicago had several ordinances in place “effectively banning handgun possession by almost all private citizens.” McDonald v. City of Chicago, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3026, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010). In 2008 the Supreme Court struck down a similar District of Columbia law on an original-meaning interpretation of the Second Amendment.1

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 10‐3525 RHONDA EZELL, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant‐Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No.

30 So.3d 1188 (2010) LAND v. VIDRINE. No. CA 09 01418. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 7, 2010. DECUIR, J. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed. SAUNDERS, J. EZELL, J.

ORDER CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE A jury consisting of a teacher, a businesswoman, an IT manager, a retired Army veteran, a fast food crew chief, a sales manager, a social worker, a web developer and computer technician, a retail customer service representative, a microbiology supervisor, and a home health care aide, returned a verdict awarding Plaintiff Cheryl Bullock $7,000

Opinion filed September 18, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00060-CV __________ JONATHAN HOBSON, JR., Appellant V. COMMISSIONERS COURT OF PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS; COUNTY JUDGE SHANE LONG; COMMISSIONER GARY GLOVER; COMMISSIONER MIKE REED; COMMISSION