⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Exceptional Marketing Group, Inc. v. Jones”

District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010-10-22 · Published · cited 1× · 749 F. Supp. 2d 1352; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113231; 2010 WL 4320457
749 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2010) EXCEPTIONAL MARKETING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Jeff JONES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:10-CV-1312-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 22, 2010. *1356 Fredric Chaiken, Chaiken Klofein, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff. Devin Howard Gordon, Hen
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RUBY WAGNER, on behalf of herself ) and all other similarly situated ) stockholders of BRP GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0150-JTL ) BRP GROUP, INC., )
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
17-0546-cv Kevin Flood, et al. v. Just Energy Marketing Group, et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: February 20, 2018 Decided: September 19, 2018)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-01-16 · Published · cited 15× · 91 F.4th 401
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0010p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RICHARD CAMPFIELD; ULTRA BOND, INC., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants/C
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE MATCH GROUP, INC. § DERIVATIVE LITIGATION § No. 368, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2020-0505 § CONSOLIDATE
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) JOSEPH A. STALLARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2703 (RBW) ) GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., et al., )
District Court, S.D. New York · 2005-09-26 · Published · cited 32× · 419 F. Supp. 2d 419; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20930; 2005 WL 2347925
419 F.Supp.2d 419 (2005) C3 MEDIA & MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FIRSTGATE INTERNET, INC., Firstgate Internet AG, Webpay International AG, Webpay Inc., Norbert Stangl and Fabian Siegel, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 9508(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 26, 2005. *420
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LORI McDOWELL, on behalf of herself and similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CGI FEDERAL INC., and Civil Action No. 15-1157 (GK) DOES 1through100, inclusive Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Lori McDowell, alleges that her personal infor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-04-22 · Published · cited 98× · 821 F.3d 723; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 518; 2016 FED App. 0101P; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290; 2016 WL 1612825
OPINION CLELAND, District Judge. This case is grounded in a story all too familiar to jurists (and to busiriess interests, we suspect): a promising joint venture gone wrong. Following the breakdown of the parties’ busiriess relationship, Cranpark, Inc. (“Cranpark”) sued and won a $15.6' million jury verdict based on a
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2017-02-15 · Published · cited 17× · 237 F. Supp. 3d 444; 2017 WL 660638; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21580
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge- On February 9, 2017, the court issued a memorandum opinion and order finding that Plaintiffs had established a prima facie case that the court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants Dominic Mag-liarditi (“Mr. Magliarditi”); Francine Magliarditi, as sued in her capacity as trustee of FRM Trust, DJM Irrevocable Trust, and Fane Trust
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017-01-23 · Published · cited 1× · 229 F. Supp. 3d 859; 2017 WL 337988; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9052
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by *864Plaintiffs Safelite Group, Inc. and Safelite Solutions LLC (“Pis.’ Mot. for Summ. J.”) [Doc. No. 69]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is granted in part and denied in par
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF COLUMBIA ) Cons. C.A. No. 12736-VCL PIPELINE GROUP, INC. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 22, 2018 Date Decided: August 30, 2018 Stephen E. Jenkins, Andrew D. Cordo, Marie M. Degnan, ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Marcus E. Montejo, Kevin H. Davenport, John G. Day, PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
03/07/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 10, 2019 Session MARK ROSS ET AL. v. ORION FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 39132 Joseph Woodruff, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 949 S.W.2d 816; 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 3727; 1997 WL 401031
Case Number: 05-96-00075-CV 06/22/1998 Record returned to Court of Appeals 05/21/1998 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed Overruled 03/31/1998 Record Received (See Remarks) 03/27/1998 Record Requested in Petition for Review 02/03/1998 Motion for Rehearing - Filed 02/03/1998 Motion for Rehearing forwarded 02/03/1998 Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the beginning of a process 01/16/1998 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 12/01/1997 Petitioner's reply bri
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-01-03 · Published · cited 56× · 775 F. Supp. 2d 613; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14; 2011 WL 9381
775 F.Supp.2d 613 (2011) ALL-STAR MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Merchant Media, LLC & Edison Nation, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MEDIA BRANDS CO., LTD. & Saonjay Mirpur, Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 1764(RMB)(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2011. *615 Adam M. Cohen, Jeffrey H. Daichman, Kane Kessler, P.C., Sarah
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 53× · 22 F. Supp. 3d 760; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1096; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75130; 2014 WL 2214209
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DISMISS, AND SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs, all foreign nationals, have filed a complaint against a variety of defendants alleging that they were fraudulently induced into investing in rental properties in the City of Detroit with false promises that the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-04-13 · Published · cited 2× · 854 F.3d 400; 2017 WL 1359477; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6391
RILEY, Chief Judge. The question in this case is whether letting Dale Ludwick pursue her federal racketeering claims against an insurance company and its affiliates would impair state regulation of the insurance business in Iowa, Maryland, or Missouri. We agree with the district court 2 that it would, and the McCarran-Fer
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 3× · 536 B.R. 646
ORDER J. Craig Whitley, United States Bankruptcy Judge In these eight related adversary proceedings, plaintiff seeks to avoid upward of $1,200,000 in prepetition transfers of the debtor’s property under Bankruptcy Code sections 547 and 548, as well as N.C.G.S. § 39-28 and to recover these monies per Code section 550. The numerous defendants and third-party defendants have re
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-08-10 · Published · cited 65× · 666 F. Supp. 2d 1109; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90994; 2009 WL 3156558
666 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2009) ALLSTAR MARKETING GROUP, LLC, a New York limited liability company, and Felknor Ventures, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. YOUR STORE ONLINE, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Chris Reoch, an individual, and Paul Reoch, an individual, TV Market, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, and TV Marketplace, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Defendants.
District Court, D. Maryland · 2004-01-28 · Published · cited 33× · 299 F. Supp. 2d 505; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1048; 2004 WL 162964
299 F.Supp.2d 505 (2004) HARTE-HANKS DIRECT MARKETING/BALTIMORE, INC. v. VARILEASE TECHNOLOGY FINANCE GROUP, INC., et al. No. CIV. CCB-03-2775. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 28, 2004. *506 *507 *508 *509