Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The "officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the "officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correctio

[Cite as State v. Roberts, 2023-Ohio-142.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICTW LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-20-1171 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201902202 v. Dominique Roberts DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

OPINION BY SOLANO, J.: Appellant Jordan Timothy Adams appeals from the order entered May 5, 2016, denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him on double, jeopardy grounds. Also before this Court is Appellant’s Motion to Strike Appendix A of the Commonwealth’s Brief. We affirm the order, of the trial court and deny Appellant’s Motion to Strike.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1730 BENJAMIN ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTINA REAGLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1730 BENJAMIN ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTINA REAGLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

BRYAN, Justice. Kenneth R. Adams appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Tractor & Equipment Co., Inc. (“TEC”). We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History Adams and James “Buddy” Money are the only two members of Waste Two Energy, LLC (“Waste Two”), a limited liability company that operates two landfills in Mobile. In early 2011, Money, the managing member o

STORY, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s decision vacating the district court’s preliminary injunction in No. 97-6347 and instructing the district court to strike Plaintiffs’ application for injunctive relief and vacating the district court’s declaratory judgment in No. 98-6192 and instructing the district court to strike f

OPINION OF THE COURT OLMSCHEID, Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appel*688lant, contrary to his pleas, of indecent acts with a female under the age of sixteen in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudg

USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Document: 304-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2022 Page: 1 of 150 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13592 ____________________ DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and th

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ ADAMS RESPIRATORY THERAPEUTICS, INC., ADAMS RESPIRATORY OPERATIONS, INC., AND ADAMS RESPIRATORY PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PERRIGO COMPANY, L. PERRIGO COMPANY, AND PERRIGO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. __________________________ 2010-1246

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ WM. WRIGLEY JR. CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, Defendant-Cross Appellant. __________________________ 2011-1140,-1150 __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-1939 VALERIE BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARY ROBERTS, MARSHAL ASPINALL, TIMOTHY COSTELLO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from

10 December 1999 NO. 4-96-0525 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Circuit Court of v. ) Sangamon County BRADLEY L. ADAMS, )

OPINION COATS, Judge. Willie Adams, Jr., was convicted, following a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, a class B felony. AS 11.41.210. Superior Court Judge Rodger W. Pegues sentenced Adams to ten years with three years suspended. He also ordered Adams to serve three years on probation following his release from incarceration.. Adams appeals, raising several issues. We reverse Adams’ conviction.

GILLETTE, J. This is a medical malpractice action brought against two doctors as a result of the death of their eleven-year-old patient, Ron Adams. Plaintiffs are the parents of the child. From a nine to three jury verdict for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. We reverse. Ron Adams died on Sunday, July 22, 1973, of peritonitis resulting from an undiagnosed case of appendicitis. Three days prior to his death, on Th

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. On July 11, 1977, the Secretary of Transportation, Brock Adams (Secretary), notified the State of South Dakota that he had made a preliminary determination that South Dakota had failed to exercise “effective control” of outdoor advertising as required by Title I of the Highway Beautification Act, 23 U.S.C. § 131 (1976), and that as a result the Secretary would temporarily reserve ten percent of the State

Opinion Per Curiam, The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided the judgment of sentence is affirmed. Opinion by Price, J., in Support op Affirmance: This appeal by Louis E. Adams follows his conviction of Receiving Stolen Goods. A post-trial motion in arrest of judgment was denied and appellant was sentenced to not

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Cynthia L. Martin, Judge Adam Bridgewater (“Bridgewater”) filed a motion to recall mandate on October 24, 2014 (“Motion”). An exhibit attached to the Motion was missing from trial counsel’s file at the time of Bridgewater’s Rule 24.035 hearing and is material to his claim of ineffective assistance which alleged .that trial counsel affirmatively misrepresented that Bridgewater would r