Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TWANDA BAILEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE et al., Defendants and Respondents. S265223 First Appellate District, Division One A153520 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CGC 15-549675 July 29, 2024

JENKINS, J., dissents with reasons. hi respectfully dissent. I do not agree with the majority’s finding that “the last step in the prosecution was the trial court’s July 19, 2011 order continuing the trial.” For reasons I previously discussed in dissent to this Court’s decision in Heirs of Simoneaux v. B-P Amoco, 13-0760 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/5/14), 131 So.3d.1128, I do not find that a continuance without

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hThe plaintiff, Alvin Jones (“Jones”), appeals the trial court’s judgment that dismissed his lawsuit against the defendant, Buck Kreihs Marine Repair, L.L.C. (hereinafter, “BKM”) on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this matter for further proceedings. I. We review the

The undisputed facts in this case show that appellee rode from Copperas Cove to Temple in an emigrant car, in which the goods of another party were being shipped from Copperas Cove to Arkansas; that he had no ticket, did not pay his fare, and had no right to ride in said car; that he was seen in said car in Temple by Sam Kirby, who was a watchman for appellant, and was also a policeman of the city of Temple. Kirby arrested appellee when he got out of the car, and immediately carried him befor

JENKINS, X Appellee has filed a motion to strike out the statement of facts herein because the same is not in compliance with the statute and the rules adopted by the Supreme Court relating to that subject. [1] We sustain this motion. The 40 pages of the statement of facts filed herein consist, to the extent of fully 30 per cent., of questions and answers. None of these questions and a

ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge. ISSUES PRESENTED 1. Whether there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding Plaintiffs status as a Jones Act seaman 2. Whether there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding Plaintiffs status as a borrowed employee of Defendant Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. 3. Whether there i

Opinion IKOLA, J. Under Penal Code section 502.5, a borrower under a loan secured by real estate may not intentionally harm the lender by removing statutorily specified improvements from the encumbered premises. 1 Section 502.5 was amended to read in its present form some 91 years ago. Despite the ag

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 19, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LINDSEY A. OCHAB Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. I-CR068877 Joseph Woodruff, Judge No. M2015-02290-CCA-R3-CD – Filed October 26, 2016 In this appeal, the State challenges the ruling of the trial court granting the defendant‟s moti

Andrews, Judge. After granting certiorari to review our decision in Landis v. Rockdale County, 206 Ga. App. 876 (427 SE2d 286) (1992), the Supreme Court entered an order “remand [ing] this case to the Court of Appeals for it to reconsider its decision in light of City of Rome v. Jordan, [263 Ga. 26 (426 SE2d 861) (1993)].” In Landis, supra, we assumed, for purposes of the defend

One J. E. Baker executed a note to appellee, and appellant signed the same as surety. After the note became due appellant made a verbal demand upon appellee to bring suit thereon; appellee did not do so for some three years after such demand. In the meantime Baker, who was solvent at the time such demand was made, became insolvent and died. Appellee instituted suit against appellant on said note and recovered judgment thereon. The statutes provide that a surety may make written demand

This suit was tried on the following agreed statement of facts: "On, to wit, January 1, 1912, W. W. Walker, being the then owner of that 109 acres of land described in plaintiff's petition, did on said day execute and deliver to the Amicable Life Insurance Company of Waco, Tex., his one promissory note for the principal sum of $2,000, due on January 1, 1922, bearing interest from date at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum, the interest being evidenced by 10 coupon notes for the principa

JENKINS, J. On November 11, 1912, appellant, under the name of Charles B. Smith & Co., and appellee entered into a contract, whereby appellee agreed to sell and deliver to Chas. B. Smith on that date, and on subsequent dates, cotton, upon which appellant was to advance to appellee at the time of delivery about ten cents per pound, balance to be paid for at a price to be named by appel-lee between October 11, 1912, and March

Findings of Fact. Appellee sued appellant for damages on account of alleged fraudulent representations made by appellant as to the value of property in the town of Lometa. Appellee alleged the facts upon which he relied to constitute such fraud; that he paid $2,500 for such property, and that the market value of the same at the time of such purchase was only $1,500; that by reason of the facts alleged he was damaged in the sum of $1,000. Appellant

Findings of Fact. JENKINS, J. (a) Plaintiff brought suit to recover the following described tract of land, to wit: 71 acres of land, more or less out of the Peyton Bland survey in Bell county, Tex., “beginning on the west bank of the Leon river at the N. E. or upper corner of a 510.41-acre tract conveyed to Joseph W. Webb by John D. May and wife Leona May, by deed dated November 11, 1859, recorded in Book H,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 19, 2002 Session CHRISTINA K. YEUBANKS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NATURAL PARENT AND SURVIVING NEXT OF KIN OF SARAH NICOLE ANDERSON V. METHODIST HEALTHCARE-MEMPHIS HOSPITALS D/B/A LE BONHEUR CHILDREN’S MEDICAL CENTER, INC., AMY L. HERTZ, M.D., S. DOUGLAS HIXSON, M.D., AND PEDIATRIC SUR

616 So.2d 298 (1993) Herwins NOE v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 90-KA-1062. Supreme Court of Mississippi. March 25, 1993. *299 Mark E. McLeod, Jackson, for appellant. Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Mary Margaret Bowers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. Before PRATHER, P.J., and PITTMAN and SMITH, JJ.

206 B.R. 252 (1997) In the Matter of SKINNER GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Bankruptcy No. N96-11349-WHD through N96-11380. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Newnan Division. February 10, 1997. *253 *254 *255 Alfred S. Lurey, Dennis S. Meir, C. Ray Mulli

Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery and felonious assault of one Larry Henry; he was found not guilty of aggravated robbery and guilty of felonious assault. He appeals to this court, assigning three errors for our review.1 The principal evidence adduced by the state was the testimony of the victim, Larry Henry. Mr. Henry stated that on the morning of April 28, 1980, appellant Sims robbed him at gunpoint, then shot him as he fled down

205 So.2d 222 (1967) MOVING PICTURE MACHINE OPERATORS LOCAL NO. 236 et al. v. E. Douglas CAYSON. 6 Div. 109. Supreme Court of Alabama. October 5, 1967. Rehearing Denied December 21, 1967. *224 Victor H. Smith, John W. Carlton and Bishop & Carlton, Birmingham, for appellants. Robt. S. Vance and Jenkins,

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr